伊朗新生儿早产最小数据集(IMSPIMDS)的开发和验证:系统回顾,焦点小组讨论和德尔菲技术

IF 0.3 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatrics Review Pub Date : 2022-03-06 DOI:10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1
S. Pahlevanynejad, Navid Danaei, M. Kahouei, M. Mirmohammadkhani, E. Saffarieh, R. Safdari
{"title":"伊朗新生儿早产最小数据集(IMSPIMDS)的开发和验证:系统回顾,焦点小组讨论和德尔菲技术","authors":"S. Pahlevanynejad, Navid Danaei, M. Kahouei, M. Mirmohammadkhani, E. Saffarieh, R. Safdari","doi":"10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Information systems help to collect information about patients. The minimum data set (MDS) provides the basis for decision-making. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the comprehensive national MDS for prematurity information management system (IMSPIMDS) in Iran. Methods: This research is a cross-sectional study with three steps including systematic review, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique. A systematic review was conducted in relevant databases. Then a focus group discussion was used to classify the extracted data elements by contributing specializing in various fields experts. Finally, MDSs were chosen through the decision Delphi technique in two rounds. Collected data were analyzed using IBM statistics SPSS 26. Results: In total, 233 data elements were included in the Delphi survey. The data elements based on the experts’ opinions, were classified into two main categories including maternal and newborn. The final data elements categories were 107 and 126. Conclusions: The existence of national MDS as the core of the premature newborn surveillance program is essential and leads to appropriate decisions. We developed and internally validated a minimum data set for prematurity researches. This study generated new knowledge to enable healthcare systems professionals to collect relevant and meaningful. The use of this standardized approach can help benchmark clinical practice and target improvements worldwide.10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1","PeriodicalId":43059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the Iranian Neonatal Prematurity Minimum Data Set (IMSPIMDS): a systematic review, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique\",\"authors\":\"S. Pahlevanynejad, Navid Danaei, M. Kahouei, M. Mirmohammadkhani, E. Saffarieh, R. Safdari\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Information systems help to collect information about patients. The minimum data set (MDS) provides the basis for decision-making. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the comprehensive national MDS for prematurity information management system (IMSPIMDS) in Iran. Methods: This research is a cross-sectional study with three steps including systematic review, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique. A systematic review was conducted in relevant databases. Then a focus group discussion was used to classify the extracted data elements by contributing specializing in various fields experts. Finally, MDSs were chosen through the decision Delphi technique in two rounds. Collected data were analyzed using IBM statistics SPSS 26. Results: In total, 233 data elements were included in the Delphi survey. The data elements based on the experts’ opinions, were classified into two main categories including maternal and newborn. The final data elements categories were 107 and 126. Conclusions: The existence of national MDS as the core of the premature newborn surveillance program is essential and leads to appropriate decisions. We developed and internally validated a minimum data set for prematurity researches. This study generated new knowledge to enable healthcare systems professionals to collect relevant and meaningful. The use of this standardized approach can help benchmark clinical practice and target improvements worldwide.10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1\",\"PeriodicalId\":43059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatrics Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatrics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:信息系统有助于收集患者信息。最小数据集(MDS)为决策提供依据。目的:本研究旨在确定伊朗早产儿信息管理系统(IMSPIMDS)的综合国家MDS。方法:采用系统综述、焦点小组讨论、德尔菲法三步法进行横断面研究。对相关数据库进行系统评价。然后采用焦点小组讨论的方式,由各领域专家对提取的数据元素进行分类。最后,通过两轮决策德尔菲法选择mds。收集的数据采用IBM统计软件SPSS 26进行分析。结果:德尔菲调查共纳入233个数据要素。根据专家的意见,将数据元素分为两大类,包括孕产妇和新生儿。最终的数据元素类别为107和126。结论:国家MDS作为早产儿监测计划的核心是必要的,并导致适当的决策。我们开发并内部验证了早产儿研究的最小数据集。这项研究产生了新的知识,使医疗保健系统专业人员能够收集相关的和有意义的。使用这种标准化方法可以帮助对临床实践进行基准测试,并在全球范围内实现目标改进
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of the Iranian Neonatal Prematurity Minimum Data Set (IMSPIMDS): a systematic review, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique
Background: Information systems help to collect information about patients. The minimum data set (MDS) provides the basis for decision-making. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the comprehensive national MDS for prematurity information management system (IMSPIMDS) in Iran. Methods: This research is a cross-sectional study with three steps including systematic review, focus group discussion, and Delphi technique. A systematic review was conducted in relevant databases. Then a focus group discussion was used to classify the extracted data elements by contributing specializing in various fields experts. Finally, MDSs were chosen through the decision Delphi technique in two rounds. Collected data were analyzed using IBM statistics SPSS 26. Results: In total, 233 data elements were included in the Delphi survey. The data elements based on the experts’ opinions, were classified into two main categories including maternal and newborn. The final data elements categories were 107 and 126. Conclusions: The existence of national MDS as the core of the premature newborn surveillance program is essential and leads to appropriate decisions. We developed and internally validated a minimum data set for prematurity researches. This study generated new knowledge to enable healthcare systems professionals to collect relevant and meaningful. The use of this standardized approach can help benchmark clinical practice and target improvements worldwide.10.32598/jpr.10.1.986.1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Sleep Disorders on Blood Sugar in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus The Effect of Chicory on Bilirubin Level in Newborns Suffering From Jaundice: A Systematic Review Case Series of Prolonged Febrile Illness in Pediatric Age Group: A Diagnostic Challenge Aplasia Cutis Congenita in a Newborn of Diabetic Mother: A Case Report and Review of Literature Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of Pancreas in a 14-year-old Adolescent Presenting With Melena: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1