你的反馈程序,我的灵感:通过评估提高学生成绩

IF 0.7 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Education Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124
Magda Kloppers, E. Potgieter
{"title":"你的反馈程序,我的灵感:通过评估提高学生成绩","authors":"Magda Kloppers, E. Potgieter","doi":"10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lecturers often claim that time constraints cause tension regarding feedback on students’ assessment opportunities. Assessment strategies for effective feedback procedures can lead to early identification of problem areas in student performance. Numerous students at higher education institutions (HEIs) do not complete their qualifications or take up to 6 years to complete a 3-year qualification. Situations like these may be avoided if lecturers provide informative feedback fostering self-directed learning, overall enhancing student achievement. In the quantitative, non-experimental descriptive research study reported on here, a set of questions was used to determine the following: (i) feedback procedures; (ii) feedback inspiration; and (iii) reflection on feedback. The data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate students at a South African university. The 3 categories above revealed 3 tiers that form part of a metacognitive methodology which indicates that feedback procedures do play a role in student achievement. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on assessment and feedback as well as the implications for feedback on current practices of university lecturers and students’ future learning endeavours.","PeriodicalId":47261,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Your feedback procedure, my inspiration: Enhancing student achievement through assessment\",\"authors\":\"Magda Kloppers, E. Potgieter\",\"doi\":\"10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lecturers often claim that time constraints cause tension regarding feedback on students’ assessment opportunities. Assessment strategies for effective feedback procedures can lead to early identification of problem areas in student performance. Numerous students at higher education institutions (HEIs) do not complete their qualifications or take up to 6 years to complete a 3-year qualification. Situations like these may be avoided if lecturers provide informative feedback fostering self-directed learning, overall enhancing student achievement. In the quantitative, non-experimental descriptive research study reported on here, a set of questions was used to determine the following: (i) feedback procedures; (ii) feedback inspiration; and (iii) reflection on feedback. The data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate students at a South African university. The 3 categories above revealed 3 tiers that form part of a metacognitive methodology which indicates that feedback procedures do play a role in student achievement. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on assessment and feedback as well as the implications for feedback on current practices of university lecturers and students’ future learning endeavours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

讲师们经常声称,时间的限制导致了对学生评估机会反馈的紧张。有效反馈程序的评估策略可以早期识别学生表现中的问题区域。许多高等教育机构(HEIs)的学生没有完成他们的资格证书,或者花了6年的时间来完成3年的资格证书。如果讲师提供信息反馈,促进自主学习,整体提高学生的成绩,这样的情况可能会避免。在这里报告的定量、非实验描述性研究中,使用了一组问题来确定以下内容:(i)反馈程序;(ii)反馈启发;(三)对反馈的反思。这些数据是从南非一所大学的本科生和研究生中收集的。上述三种分类揭示了构成元认知方法一部分的三个层次,这表明反馈程序确实在学生成绩中发挥作用。本研究为评估和反馈的知识体系做出了贡献,并对大学讲师和学生未来学习努力的当前实践反馈产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Your feedback procedure, my inspiration: Enhancing student achievement through assessment
Lecturers often claim that time constraints cause tension regarding feedback on students’ assessment opportunities. Assessment strategies for effective feedback procedures can lead to early identification of problem areas in student performance. Numerous students at higher education institutions (HEIs) do not complete their qualifications or take up to 6 years to complete a 3-year qualification. Situations like these may be avoided if lecturers provide informative feedback fostering self-directed learning, overall enhancing student achievement. In the quantitative, non-experimental descriptive research study reported on here, a set of questions was used to determine the following: (i) feedback procedures; (ii) feedback inspiration; and (iii) reflection on feedback. The data were collected from undergraduate and postgraduate students at a South African university. The 3 categories above revealed 3 tiers that form part of a metacognitive methodology which indicates that feedback procedures do play a role in student achievement. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on assessment and feedback as well as the implications for feedback on current practices of university lecturers and students’ future learning endeavours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Education
South African Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Education (SAJE) publishes original research articles reporting on research that fulfils the criteria of a generally accepted research paradigm; review articles, intended for the professional scientist and which critically evaluate the research done in a specific field in education; book reviews, i.e. concise evaluations of books that have recently appeared; and letters in which criticism is given of articles that appeared in this Journal. Indicate the relevance of the study for education research where the education system is characterised by transformation, and/or an emerging economy/development state, and/or scarce resources. Research articles of localised content, i.e. of interest only to specific areas or specialists and which would not appeal to the broader readership of the Journal, should preferably not be submitted for consideration by the Editorial Committee. Ethical considerations: A brief narrative account/description of ethical issues/aspects should be included in articles that report on empirical findings.
期刊最新文献
Setting up classroom libraries in rural areas: The case of Mogodumo circuit in Limpopo Obstacles to critical thinking: A qualitative study on secondary school learners in Masvingo, Zimbabwe The effect of life-design-based counselling on high school learners from resource-constrained communities Dispositional mindfulness associated with less academic burnout among Muslim students during the COVID-19 pandemic Guidelines for instructional design of courses for the development of self-regulated learning for teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1