奥尔内特·科尔曼:领土与冒险玛丽亚·戈利亚著。伦敦:Reaktion Books, 2020。

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Journal of the Society for American Music Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1017/s1752196322000244
Kwami Coleman
{"title":"奥尔内特·科尔曼:领土与冒险玛丽亚·戈利亚著。伦敦:Reaktion Books, 2020。","authors":"Kwami Coleman","doi":"10.1017/s1752196322000244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ornette Coleman (1930–2015) and seven other musicians participated in a recording session on a cold December day in 1960 for Atlantic Records that was released as Free Jazz: A Collective Improvisation. That album title and the experimental, heterophonic group improvisation that comprised the nearly 38-minute performance, became the metonym for Coleman’s entire creative practice—and that of other experimentalists—for decades to come, forever casting him and subsequent “free jazz” musicians as abdicators of stylistic conventions and harmonic rules. Coleman, and what music journalists in the 1960s called “the new thing,” are now understood by students of jazz history as either an alternative branch or a break away from the jazz tradition. That purported “break,” however, was created in a fraught political moment. When Coleman moved in 1959 from Los Angeles to New York City (where his professional career took off), protests were erupting all around the country to demand full citizenship and civil rights for African Americans— a cause that overlapped with a burgeoning youth-led movement against the status quo. He arrived in town for an infamous weeks-long run at the Five Spot Café, a well-known club in Manhattan’s East Village, and it was that string of gigs (effectively a residency) that attracted influential figures in the New York music industry, from Leonard Bernstein to Miles Davis. The music he played there was experimental, and the sound of his piano-less quartet and white plastic alto saxophone convinced local journalists that a “new thing” in jazz had indeed arrived, but not that it—or Coleman himself—were “serious,” or capable musicians. Nevertheless, he became an emblem of the jazz avant-garde in the 1960s and, as the decade progressed, some music journalists suspected that this more experimental improvised sound was a kind of protest music. Though he did not have the same angry Black musician reputation as Cecil Taylor or Archie Shepp, the almost exclusively white-male field of music journalism in the 1960s debated Coleman’s unique instrumental tone and improvisational style, and some critics and musicians openly doubted whether he and those in his groups were legitimate players. However, after succeeding in Europe and receiving a Guggenheim grant in 1967, Ornette Coleman became regarded worldwide as an eccentric—probably genius—and unmistakably idiosyncratic musical force. Maria Golia’s recent monograph of Coleman makes a subtle yet powerful intervention into the reputation of eccentricity and subversion that follows his legacy today, 7 years after his death. He is an iconoclast to be sure, but one who was more of an explorer than an insurgent; someone committed to a journey of musical imagination and possibility that took him to the far reaches of his own creative vision and also into the grasp of unsuspecting and uninitiated listeners. For Golia, Coleman the artist cannot be separated from Coleman the Texan, so the narrative arc of her book begins and ends in his hometown of Fort Worth, Texas. Golia, an independent researcher and engaging writer whose previous books cover the history of photography in Egypt, profile the city of Cairo, and investigate the cultural impact of meteorites, seeks to capture in prose the times and places that influenced Coleman’s music and creative visions. To contextualize Coleman’s childhood, for instance, Golia spends the first ten pages of Part 1 providing a gloss of the city’s history from the mid-nineteenth century to","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":"16 1","pages":"348 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ornette Coleman: The Territory and the Adventure By Maria Golia. London: Reaktion Books, 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Kwami Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1752196322000244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ornette Coleman (1930–2015) and seven other musicians participated in a recording session on a cold December day in 1960 for Atlantic Records that was released as Free Jazz: A Collective Improvisation. That album title and the experimental, heterophonic group improvisation that comprised the nearly 38-minute performance, became the metonym for Coleman’s entire creative practice—and that of other experimentalists—for decades to come, forever casting him and subsequent “free jazz” musicians as abdicators of stylistic conventions and harmonic rules. Coleman, and what music journalists in the 1960s called “the new thing,” are now understood by students of jazz history as either an alternative branch or a break away from the jazz tradition. That purported “break,” however, was created in a fraught political moment. When Coleman moved in 1959 from Los Angeles to New York City (where his professional career took off), protests were erupting all around the country to demand full citizenship and civil rights for African Americans— a cause that overlapped with a burgeoning youth-led movement against the status quo. He arrived in town for an infamous weeks-long run at the Five Spot Café, a well-known club in Manhattan’s East Village, and it was that string of gigs (effectively a residency) that attracted influential figures in the New York music industry, from Leonard Bernstein to Miles Davis. The music he played there was experimental, and the sound of his piano-less quartet and white plastic alto saxophone convinced local journalists that a “new thing” in jazz had indeed arrived, but not that it—or Coleman himself—were “serious,” or capable musicians. Nevertheless, he became an emblem of the jazz avant-garde in the 1960s and, as the decade progressed, some music journalists suspected that this more experimental improvised sound was a kind of protest music. Though he did not have the same angry Black musician reputation as Cecil Taylor or Archie Shepp, the almost exclusively white-male field of music journalism in the 1960s debated Coleman’s unique instrumental tone and improvisational style, and some critics and musicians openly doubted whether he and those in his groups were legitimate players. However, after succeeding in Europe and receiving a Guggenheim grant in 1967, Ornette Coleman became regarded worldwide as an eccentric—probably genius—and unmistakably idiosyncratic musical force. Maria Golia’s recent monograph of Coleman makes a subtle yet powerful intervention into the reputation of eccentricity and subversion that follows his legacy today, 7 years after his death. He is an iconoclast to be sure, but one who was more of an explorer than an insurgent; someone committed to a journey of musical imagination and possibility that took him to the far reaches of his own creative vision and also into the grasp of unsuspecting and uninitiated listeners. For Golia, Coleman the artist cannot be separated from Coleman the Texan, so the narrative arc of her book begins and ends in his hometown of Fort Worth, Texas. Golia, an independent researcher and engaging writer whose previous books cover the history of photography in Egypt, profile the city of Cairo, and investigate the cultural impact of meteorites, seeks to capture in prose the times and places that influenced Coleman’s music and creative visions. To contextualize Coleman’s childhood, for instance, Golia spends the first ten pages of Part 1 providing a gloss of the city’s history from the mid-nineteenth century to\",\"PeriodicalId\":42557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for American Music\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"348 - 350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for American Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752196322000244\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752196322000244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Ornette Coleman(1930-2015)和其他七位音乐家在1960年12月的一个寒冷的日子里为大西洋唱片公司录制了一段录音,并发行了《Free Jazz: a Collective Improvisation》。那张专辑的名字和由近38分钟的表演组成的实验性的、杂音的即兴演奏,成为了科尔曼整个创作实践的代名词——以及其他实验主义者的代名词——在接下来的几十年里,科尔曼和后来的“自由爵士”音乐家永远被视为风格惯例和和声规则的退位者。科尔曼和20世纪60年代音乐记者所称的“新事物”,现在被爵士历史的学生理解为爵士传统的另一个分支或突破。然而,这种所谓的“决裂”是在一个令人担忧的政治时刻产生的。1959年,当科尔曼从洛杉矶搬到纽约市(他的职业生涯开始的地方)时,全国各地爆发了抗议活动,要求给予非裔美国人完全的公民权和公民权——这一事业与迅速发展的青年领导的反对现状的运动相重叠。他来到纽约后,在曼哈顿东村的一家知名俱乐部Five Spot caf进行了臭名昭著的长达数周的演出,正是这一连串的演出(实际上是一种驻地演出)吸引了纽约音乐界有影响力的人物,从伦纳德·伯恩斯坦(Leonard Bernstein)到迈尔斯·戴维斯(Miles Davis)。他在那里演奏的音乐是实验性的,他的无钢琴四重奏和白色塑料中音萨克斯管的声音让当地的记者相信爵士乐的“新事物”确实到来了,但并不是说它——或者科尔曼本人——是“严肃的”或有能力的音乐家。尽管如此,他还是成为了20世纪60年代爵士先锋派的象征,随着时间的推移,一些音乐记者怀疑这种更具实验性的即兴音乐是一种抗议音乐。虽然他不像塞西尔·泰勒或阿奇·谢普那样有愤怒的黑人音乐家的名声,但在20世纪60年代,几乎全是白人男性的音乐新闻领域对科尔曼独特的器乐音调和即兴风格进行了辩论,一些评论家和音乐家公开怀疑他和他的乐队里的人是否是合法的演奏者。然而,在欧洲取得成功并于1967年获得古根海姆基金会的资助后,奥尔内特·科尔曼在世界范围内被认为是一个古怪的——可能是天才的——毫无疑问是独特的音乐力量。玛丽亚·戈利亚(Maria Golia)最近出版的关于科尔曼的专著,在他去世7年后的今天,对他留下的古怪和颠覆的名声进行了微妙而有力的干预。诚然,他是一个打破传统的人,但他更像一个探险家,而不是一个叛逆者;他致力于音乐想象和可能性的旅程,将他带到了自己创造性视野的远方,也进入了毫无戒心和无知的听众的掌握之中。对戈利亚来说,科尔曼这个艺术家和科尔曼这个德克萨斯人是分不开的,所以她的书的叙事弧线从他的家乡德克萨斯州沃斯堡开始到结束。Golia是一位独立研究人员和引人入胜的作家,他之前的书涵盖了埃及的摄影历史,介绍了开罗市,并调查了陨石的文化影响,他试图用散文捕捉影响科尔曼音乐和创作愿景的时代和地点。例如,为了将科尔曼的童年置于背景中,戈利亚在第一部分的前十页中对这座城市从19世纪中叶到19世纪中叶的历史进行了描述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ornette Coleman: The Territory and the Adventure By Maria Golia. London: Reaktion Books, 2020.
Ornette Coleman (1930–2015) and seven other musicians participated in a recording session on a cold December day in 1960 for Atlantic Records that was released as Free Jazz: A Collective Improvisation. That album title and the experimental, heterophonic group improvisation that comprised the nearly 38-minute performance, became the metonym for Coleman’s entire creative practice—and that of other experimentalists—for decades to come, forever casting him and subsequent “free jazz” musicians as abdicators of stylistic conventions and harmonic rules. Coleman, and what music journalists in the 1960s called “the new thing,” are now understood by students of jazz history as either an alternative branch or a break away from the jazz tradition. That purported “break,” however, was created in a fraught political moment. When Coleman moved in 1959 from Los Angeles to New York City (where his professional career took off), protests were erupting all around the country to demand full citizenship and civil rights for African Americans— a cause that overlapped with a burgeoning youth-led movement against the status quo. He arrived in town for an infamous weeks-long run at the Five Spot Café, a well-known club in Manhattan’s East Village, and it was that string of gigs (effectively a residency) that attracted influential figures in the New York music industry, from Leonard Bernstein to Miles Davis. The music he played there was experimental, and the sound of his piano-less quartet and white plastic alto saxophone convinced local journalists that a “new thing” in jazz had indeed arrived, but not that it—or Coleman himself—were “serious,” or capable musicians. Nevertheless, he became an emblem of the jazz avant-garde in the 1960s and, as the decade progressed, some music journalists suspected that this more experimental improvised sound was a kind of protest music. Though he did not have the same angry Black musician reputation as Cecil Taylor or Archie Shepp, the almost exclusively white-male field of music journalism in the 1960s debated Coleman’s unique instrumental tone and improvisational style, and some critics and musicians openly doubted whether he and those in his groups were legitimate players. However, after succeeding in Europe and receiving a Guggenheim grant in 1967, Ornette Coleman became regarded worldwide as an eccentric—probably genius—and unmistakably idiosyncratic musical force. Maria Golia’s recent monograph of Coleman makes a subtle yet powerful intervention into the reputation of eccentricity and subversion that follows his legacy today, 7 years after his death. He is an iconoclast to be sure, but one who was more of an explorer than an insurgent; someone committed to a journey of musical imagination and possibility that took him to the far reaches of his own creative vision and also into the grasp of unsuspecting and uninitiated listeners. For Golia, Coleman the artist cannot be separated from Coleman the Texan, so the narrative arc of her book begins and ends in his hometown of Fort Worth, Texas. Golia, an independent researcher and engaging writer whose previous books cover the history of photography in Egypt, profile the city of Cairo, and investigate the cultural impact of meteorites, seeks to capture in prose the times and places that influenced Coleman’s music and creative visions. To contextualize Coleman’s childhood, for instance, Golia spends the first ten pages of Part 1 providing a gloss of the city’s history from the mid-nineteenth century to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
Binational Indianism in James DeMars’s Guadalupe, Our Lady of the Roses Joshua McCarter Simpson's Songs and Mid-Nineteenth Century Antislavery Activism Opera and Land: Settler Colonialism and the Geopolitics of Music at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School Heitor Villa-Lobos and the Traces of Coloniality in Andrés Segovia's Guitar Repertoire Bernice Johnson Reagon's Musical Coalition Politics, 1966–81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1