恢复人:对大卫·沃尔什的《人的优先:政治、哲学和历史发现》的回顾

Q4 Social Sciences Perspectives on Political Science Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1080/10457097.2021.1973305
J. Wensveen
{"title":"恢复人:对大卫·沃尔什的《人的优先:政治、哲学和历史发现》的回顾","authors":"J. Wensveen","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2021.1973305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In The Priority of the Person: Political, Philosophical, and Historical Discoveries, David Walsh attempts to showcase the discovery of the person as “the pivot around whom everything revolves”. In so doing, however, he not only rebuts the claims of traditionalists and progressive liberals that liberal democracy is either self-subverting or hopelessly incoherent, but also, the claims among many today that our being as members of a particular race, class, or gender trumps our being as persons. Accordingly, by bringing to our attention the “hidden liberal strength,” Walsh’s “personalist” project also brings to our attention the fact that, however preoccupied with the concept of ‘intersectionality’ we become, at the core of the liberal experiment lies not the recognition of the inviolability of one’s “group identity,” but rather, the recognition of “the person, each person,” as “prior to all else that is”.","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"50 1","pages":"236 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovering the Person: A Review of David Walsh’s The Priority of the Person: Political, Philosophical, and Historical Discoveries\",\"authors\":\"J. Wensveen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10457097.2021.1973305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In The Priority of the Person: Political, Philosophical, and Historical Discoveries, David Walsh attempts to showcase the discovery of the person as “the pivot around whom everything revolves”. In so doing, however, he not only rebuts the claims of traditionalists and progressive liberals that liberal democracy is either self-subverting or hopelessly incoherent, but also, the claims among many today that our being as members of a particular race, class, or gender trumps our being as persons. Accordingly, by bringing to our attention the “hidden liberal strength,” Walsh’s “personalist” project also brings to our attention the fact that, however preoccupied with the concept of ‘intersectionality’ we become, at the core of the liberal experiment lies not the recognition of the inviolability of one’s “group identity,” but rather, the recognition of “the person, each person,” as “prior to all else that is”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"236 - 239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2021.1973305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2021.1973305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《人的优先:政治、哲学和历史的发现》一书中,大卫·沃尔什试图展示人的发现是“一切都围绕着他旋转的轴心”。然而,在这样做的过程中,他不仅反驳了传统主义者和进步自由主义者的说法,即自由民主要么是自我颠覆,要么是无可救药地不一致,而且还反驳了今天许多人的说法,即我们作为一个特定种族、阶级或性别的成员胜过我们作为一个人的存在。因此,通过让我们注意到“隐藏的自由主义力量”,沃尔什的“个人主义”计划也让我们注意到这样一个事实:无论我们变得多么专注于“交叉性”的概念,自由主义实验的核心并不在于承认一个人的“群体身份”的不可侵犯性,而是承认“个人,每个人”“先于其他所有人”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recovering the Person: A Review of David Walsh’s The Priority of the Person: Political, Philosophical, and Historical Discoveries
Abstract In The Priority of the Person: Political, Philosophical, and Historical Discoveries, David Walsh attempts to showcase the discovery of the person as “the pivot around whom everything revolves”. In so doing, however, he not only rebuts the claims of traditionalists and progressive liberals that liberal democracy is either self-subverting or hopelessly incoherent, but also, the claims among many today that our being as members of a particular race, class, or gender trumps our being as persons. Accordingly, by bringing to our attention the “hidden liberal strength,” Walsh’s “personalist” project also brings to our attention the fact that, however preoccupied with the concept of ‘intersectionality’ we become, at the core of the liberal experiment lies not the recognition of the inviolability of one’s “group identity,” but rather, the recognition of “the person, each person,” as “prior to all else that is”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Political Science
Perspectives on Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.
期刊最新文献
Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? by Najeeb T. Haddad, Cascade Books, Publication Date: 2023 Conversation as Political Education Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science , by Alex Priou, Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 184 pp., ISBN 978-0-88146-914-1, Publication Date: 2023 The Politics of Suicide: Miasma and Katharmos in Plato’s Political Thought “Worse than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism,” by Erwin Chemerinsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1