超声检查在成人喉罩气道定位中的作用

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.50103
F. Atar, G. Keskin, F. Akaslan, A. Donmez
{"title":"超声检查在成人喉罩气道定位中的作用","authors":"F. Atar, G. Keskin, F. Akaslan, A. Donmez","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.50103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study aims to evaluate the Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) position with ultrasonographic imaging. Methods: The study included American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III patients with Mallampati scores I-II and operated using PLMA as an airway device. Before PLMA insertion, the glottic aperture was assessed by ultrasonography (USG). After PLMA placement, the USG evaluation was repeated. The symmetry of the arytenoid cartilages was examined. Asymmetry of an arytenoid to the glottic midline and the other arytenoid was graded 0 to 3 (USG arytenoid grade). After PLMA was placed, fiber optic bronchoscopy (FOB) was done to evaluate the PLMA position (FOB LMA grade). The relationship between USG arytenoid grade and FOB LMA grade was examined. Results: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49 ± 15.8 (19-82), and 25 were female. It was determined that PLMA was in the correct position in 81.3% of the evaluation with USG and 68.8% of the assessment with FOB. USG arytenoid grade correlated with FOB LMA grade (r= -.582, p<.001). To detect a rotated LMA, USG had a sensitivity of 100% (%95 CI, 39.8 – 100.0) and a specificity of %80 (%95 CI, 22.8 – 99.8). The positive and negative predictive values were %97.7 (%95 CI, 88.0 – 99.9) and %100 (%95 CI, 91.8 – 100.0), respectively. The accuracy was %97.9 (%95 CI, 86.3 – 99.3). Conclusion: Ultrasonografi can be a simple, noninvasive, and reliable method to confirm PLMA placement in anesthesia practice. Keywords: Laryngeal mask airway, ultrasonography, airway management","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Ultrasonography in Confirming the Position of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adult Patients\",\"authors\":\"F. Atar, G. Keskin, F. Akaslan, A. Donmez\",\"doi\":\"10.54875/jarss.2023.50103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The study aims to evaluate the Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) position with ultrasonographic imaging. Methods: The study included American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III patients with Mallampati scores I-II and operated using PLMA as an airway device. Before PLMA insertion, the glottic aperture was assessed by ultrasonography (USG). After PLMA placement, the USG evaluation was repeated. The symmetry of the arytenoid cartilages was examined. Asymmetry of an arytenoid to the glottic midline and the other arytenoid was graded 0 to 3 (USG arytenoid grade). After PLMA was placed, fiber optic bronchoscopy (FOB) was done to evaluate the PLMA position (FOB LMA grade). The relationship between USG arytenoid grade and FOB LMA grade was examined. Results: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49 ± 15.8 (19-82), and 25 were female. It was determined that PLMA was in the correct position in 81.3% of the evaluation with USG and 68.8% of the assessment with FOB. USG arytenoid grade correlated with FOB LMA grade (r= -.582, p<.001). To detect a rotated LMA, USG had a sensitivity of 100% (%95 CI, 39.8 – 100.0) and a specificity of %80 (%95 CI, 22.8 – 99.8). The positive and negative predictive values were %97.7 (%95 CI, 88.0 – 99.9) and %100 (%95 CI, 91.8 – 100.0), respectively. The accuracy was %97.9 (%95 CI, 86.3 – 99.3). Conclusion: Ultrasonografi can be a simple, noninvasive, and reliable method to confirm PLMA placement in anesthesia practice. Keywords: Laryngeal mask airway, ultrasonography, airway management\",\"PeriodicalId\":36000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.50103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.50103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用超声成像技术评价喉罩气道(PLMA)的位置。方法:该研究包括美国麻醉师协会I-III的Mallampati评分为I-II的患者,并使用PLMA作为气道装置进行手术。PLMA插入前,通过超声检查(USG)评估声门开口。放置PLMA后,重复USG评估。检查了杓状软骨的对称性。一个杓与声门中线不对称,另一个杓鹬分级为0至3(USG杓鹬级)。放置PLMA后,进行光纤支气管镜检查(FOB)以评估PLMA位置(FOB LMA等级)。研究了USG类杓级别和FOB LMA级别之间的关系。结果:48名患者被纳入研究。平均年龄49±15.8(19-82),女性25例。确定PLMA在USG评估的81.3%和FOB评估的68.8%中处于正确位置。USG杓状物分级与FOB LMA分级相关(r=-.582,p<.001)。检测旋转LMA,USG的敏感性为100%(%95 CI,39.8–100.0),特异性为%80(%95 CI,22.8–99.8)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为%97.7(%95 CI88.0–99.9)和%100(%95%CI,91.8–100.00)。准确率为%97.9(95%CI,86.3–99.3)。结论:在麻醉实践中,超声心动图是一种简单、无创、可靠的PLMA定位方法。关键词:喉罩气道,超声检查,气道管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Ultrasonography in Confirming the Position of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adult Patients
Objective: The study aims to evaluate the Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) position with ultrasonographic imaging. Methods: The study included American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III patients with Mallampati scores I-II and operated using PLMA as an airway device. Before PLMA insertion, the glottic aperture was assessed by ultrasonography (USG). After PLMA placement, the USG evaluation was repeated. The symmetry of the arytenoid cartilages was examined. Asymmetry of an arytenoid to the glottic midline and the other arytenoid was graded 0 to 3 (USG arytenoid grade). After PLMA was placed, fiber optic bronchoscopy (FOB) was done to evaluate the PLMA position (FOB LMA grade). The relationship between USG arytenoid grade and FOB LMA grade was examined. Results: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49 ± 15.8 (19-82), and 25 were female. It was determined that PLMA was in the correct position in 81.3% of the evaluation with USG and 68.8% of the assessment with FOB. USG arytenoid grade correlated with FOB LMA grade (r= -.582, p<.001). To detect a rotated LMA, USG had a sensitivity of 100% (%95 CI, 39.8 – 100.0) and a specificity of %80 (%95 CI, 22.8 – 99.8). The positive and negative predictive values were %97.7 (%95 CI, 88.0 – 99.9) and %100 (%95 CI, 91.8 – 100.0), respectively. The accuracy was %97.9 (%95 CI, 86.3 – 99.3). Conclusion: Ultrasonografi can be a simple, noninvasive, and reliable method to confirm PLMA placement in anesthesia practice. Keywords: Laryngeal mask airway, ultrasonography, airway management
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1