旧的退了,替代的进了:对律师如何使用替代收费安排来满足日益强大的客户的批判性审查

Joshua Yan
{"title":"旧的退了,替代的进了:对律师如何使用替代收费安排来满足日益强大的客户的批判性审查","authors":"Joshua Yan","doi":"10.53300/001C.17541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines law firms’ need to replace the billable hour with alternative fee arrangements and discusses the ethical and managerial hurdles they will face when making this transition. It analyses the characteristics of client demand for legal pricing models and determines that client demand can only be satisfied by firms that implement alternative fee arrangements. This proposition is supported by research which suggests that alternative fee arrangements optimise firm profitability and enable firms to retain their clients whose bargaining power has been enlarged by technology. Finally, this article provides practical guidance on factors firms must consider when adopting alternative fee arrangements, specifically legal ethics issues and managerial challenges that must be addressed when implementing disruptive innovations. Ultimately, the author intends to highlight the industry-wide misalignment between client demand and the billable hour, and persuade firms to optimise their profitability and chances of survival by adopting alternative fee arrangements.","PeriodicalId":33279,"journal":{"name":"Bond Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out with the Old, in with the Alternative: A Critical Examination of How Lawyers Can Use Alternative Fee Arrangements to Satisfy Increasingly Powerful Clients\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.53300/001C.17541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines law firms’ need to replace the billable hour with alternative fee arrangements and discusses the ethical and managerial hurdles they will face when making this transition. It analyses the characteristics of client demand for legal pricing models and determines that client demand can only be satisfied by firms that implement alternative fee arrangements. This proposition is supported by research which suggests that alternative fee arrangements optimise firm profitability and enable firms to retain their clients whose bargaining power has been enlarged by technology. Finally, this article provides practical guidance on factors firms must consider when adopting alternative fee arrangements, specifically legal ethics issues and managerial challenges that must be addressed when implementing disruptive innovations. Ultimately, the author intends to highlight the industry-wide misalignment between client demand and the billable hour, and persuade firms to optimise their profitability and chances of survival by adopting alternative fee arrangements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bond Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bond Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.17541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bond Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.17541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了律师事务所用替代收费安排取代计费时间的必要性,并讨论了他们在进行这一转变时将面临的道德和管理障碍。它分析了法律定价模型的客户需求特征,并确定只有实施替代费用安排的公司才能满足客户需求。这一主张得到了研究的支持,该研究表明,替代费用安排优化了公司的盈利能力,并使公司能够留住其议价能力因技术而扩大的客户。最后,本文就企业在采用替代费用安排时必须考虑的因素提供了实际指导,特别是在实施颠覆性创新时必须解决的法律道德问题和管理挑战。最终,作者打算强调整个行业客户需求和计费时间之间的不一致,并说服公司通过采用替代费用安排来优化其盈利能力和生存机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Out with the Old, in with the Alternative: A Critical Examination of How Lawyers Can Use Alternative Fee Arrangements to Satisfy Increasingly Powerful Clients
This article examines law firms’ need to replace the billable hour with alternative fee arrangements and discusses the ethical and managerial hurdles they will face when making this transition. It analyses the characteristics of client demand for legal pricing models and determines that client demand can only be satisfied by firms that implement alternative fee arrangements. This proposition is supported by research which suggests that alternative fee arrangements optimise firm profitability and enable firms to retain their clients whose bargaining power has been enlarged by technology. Finally, this article provides practical guidance on factors firms must consider when adopting alternative fee arrangements, specifically legal ethics issues and managerial challenges that must be addressed when implementing disruptive innovations. Ultimately, the author intends to highlight the industry-wide misalignment between client demand and the billable hour, and persuade firms to optimise their profitability and chances of survival by adopting alternative fee arrangements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
‘Often Fails to Give Close Attention to Detail’: Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Criminal Justice Offender Populations A Practitioner’s Perspective Concerning the Links between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the Criminal Justice System Understanding the Nature of ADHD and the Vulnerability of Those with the Condition Who Fall Foul of the Criminal Justice System Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy Legal Considerations in Machine-Assisted Decision-Making: Planning and Building as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1