EpiFibro(巴西纤维肌痛登记处):ACR分类数据和初步诊断标准的完成和随访评估

José Eduardo Martinez , Eduardo S. Paiva , Marcelo C. Rezende , Roberto E. Heymann , Milton Helfenstein Jr. , Aline Ranzolin , Jose Roberto Provenza , Luiz Severiano Ribeiro , Eduardo J.R. Souza , Daniel P. Feldman , Marcos Renato de Assis
{"title":"EpiFibro(巴西纤维肌痛登记处):ACR分类数据和初步诊断标准的完成和随访评估","authors":"José Eduardo Martinez ,&nbsp;Eduardo S. Paiva ,&nbsp;Marcelo C. Rezende ,&nbsp;Roberto E. Heymann ,&nbsp;Milton Helfenstein Jr. ,&nbsp;Aline Ranzolin ,&nbsp;Jose Roberto Provenza ,&nbsp;Luiz Severiano Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Eduardo J.R. Souza ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Feldman ,&nbsp;Marcos Renato de Assis","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow‐up evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow‐up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between PDS and FIQ. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow‐up monitoring parameter were considered. (FIQ: 222; PDS: 199; both: 195). The mean follow‐up time was 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.5 months (1‐ 44). Most patients became stable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation. Most patients remained stable over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EpiFibro (Registro Brasileiro de Fibromialgia): dados sobre a classificação do ACR e preenchimento dos critérios diagnósticos preliminares e avaliação de seguimento\",\"authors\":\"José Eduardo Martinez ,&nbsp;Eduardo S. Paiva ,&nbsp;Marcelo C. Rezende ,&nbsp;Roberto E. Heymann ,&nbsp;Milton Helfenstein Jr. ,&nbsp;Aline Ranzolin ,&nbsp;Jose Roberto Provenza ,&nbsp;Luiz Severiano Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Eduardo J.R. Souza ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Feldman ,&nbsp;Marcos Renato de Assis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow‐up evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow‐up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between PDS and FIQ. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow‐up monitoring parameter were considered. (FIQ: 222; PDS: 199; both: 195). The mean follow‐up time was 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.5 months (1‐ 44). Most patients became stable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation. Most patients remained stable over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

epifibro(巴西纤维肌痛流行病学研究)是为了研究纤维肌痛患者而创建的。自2011年起,根据1990年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛分类标准(ACR1990)纳入患者。目的确定2014年仍有多少患者符合ACR1990和ACR2010标准;以确定FM影响之间的相关性,并描述随访评估的数据。方法:这是一项多中心患者队列的横断面研究。这些数据是在2013年至2015年间收集的。医师纳入了在入组之日符合ACR1990标准的患者。随访数据仅考虑至少有两次评估的患者。最小显著变化被认为是参数得分变化30%。结果共分析810例患者资料。患者平均年龄51.8±11.5岁。共有786名女性。大多数患者同时满足这两个标准。ACR2010得到了更大的实现。PDS与FIQ有中度相关性。发现314例患者有不止一种评估,但有88例患者被排除在外。因此,226例患者有一个随访监测参数。(FIQ: 222;PDS: 199;: 195)。平均随访时间为9.1±7.5个月(1‐44)。大多数病人病情稳定。结论在epifibro中,大多数患者同时满足ACR1990和ACR2010。在评估时,更多的患者符合ACR2010。有中等程度的相关性。大多数患者在一段时间内保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EpiFibro (Registro Brasileiro de Fibromialgia): dados sobre a classificação do ACR e preenchimento dos critérios diagnósticos preliminares e avaliação de seguimento

Introduction

EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990).

Objectives

To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow‐up evaluation.

Methods

This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow‐up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores.

Results

810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8 ± 11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between PDS and FIQ. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow‐up monitoring parameter were considered. (FIQ: 222; PDS: 199; both: 195). The mean follow‐up time was 9.1 ± 7.5 months (1‐ 44). Most patients became stable.

Conclusion

InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation. Most patients remained stable over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.82
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome nefrótica como a primeira manifestação da esclerodermia sistêmica juvenil Presença de corpos riziformes em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil: relato de caso e revisão de literatura Redução da ativação e do recrutamento de linfócito CD3 com o uso de anticorpo anti‐TNF‐alfa: avaliação da resposta clínica e cintilográfica com 99mTc‐OKT3 em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil Doença de Lyme e artrite idiopática juvenil – Relato de caso clínico pediátrico Anormalidades esofágicas na esclerodermia localizada juvenil: associação com outras manifestações extracutâneas?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1