José Eduardo Martinez , Eduardo S. Paiva , Marcelo C. Rezende , Roberto E. Heymann , Milton Helfenstein Jr. , Aline Ranzolin , Jose Roberto Provenza , Luiz Severiano Ribeiro , Eduardo J.R. Souza , Daniel P. Feldman , Marcos Renato de Assis
{"title":"EpiFibro(巴西纤维肌痛登记处):ACR分类数据和初步诊断标准的完成和随访评估","authors":"José Eduardo Martinez , Eduardo S. Paiva , Marcelo C. Rezende , Roberto E. Heymann , Milton Helfenstein Jr. , Aline Ranzolin , Jose Roberto Provenza , Luiz Severiano Ribeiro , Eduardo J.R. Souza , Daniel P. Feldman , Marcos Renato de Assis","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow‐up evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow‐up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between PDS and FIQ. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow‐up monitoring parameter were considered. (FIQ: 222; PDS: 199; both: 195). The mean follow‐up time was 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.5 months (1‐ 44). Most patients became stable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation. Most patients remained stable over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EpiFibro (Registro Brasileiro de Fibromialgia): dados sobre a classificação do ACR e preenchimento dos critérios diagnósticos preliminares e avaliação de seguimento\",\"authors\":\"José Eduardo Martinez , Eduardo S. Paiva , Marcelo C. Rezende , Roberto E. Heymann , Milton Helfenstein Jr. , Aline Ranzolin , Jose Roberto Provenza , Luiz Severiano Ribeiro , Eduardo J.R. Souza , Daniel P. Feldman , Marcos Renato de Assis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow‐up evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow‐up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between PDS and FIQ. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow‐up monitoring parameter were considered. (FIQ: 222; PDS: 199; both: 195). The mean follow‐up time was 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.5 months (1‐ 44). Most patients became stable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation. Most patients remained stable over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
EpiFibro (Registro Brasileiro de Fibromialgia): dados sobre a classificação do ACR e preenchimento dos critérios diagnósticos preliminares e avaliação de seguimento
Introduction
EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990).
Objectives
To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow‐up evaluation.
Methods
This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow‐up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores.
Results
810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8 ± 11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between PDS and FIQ. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow‐up monitoring parameter were considered. (FIQ: 222; PDS: 199; both: 195). The mean follow‐up time was 9.1 ± 7.5 months (1‐ 44). Most patients became stable.
Conclusion
InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation. Most patients remained stable over time.
期刊介绍:
RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.