维特根斯坦与科学

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Revista de Filosofia Aurora Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds09
Léo Peruzzo Júnior
{"title":"维特根斯坦与科学","authors":"Léo Peruzzo Júnior","doi":"10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein states that man has the ability to construct languages with which all meanings may be expressed, but that it is humanly impossible to immediately extract its logic from it. Thus, language is a costume that disguises thought while proposition is a figuration of reality. This paper is aimed at showing how the position of the Tractatus in relation to sciences puts aside the idea that scientific knowledge should be rooted in raw data, that is, observations that may be made regardless of any theoretical orientation. Accordingly, this study claims that the Tractarian position does not admit the presumption that behind raw data there is a reality that is independent of the observer, considering that, as stated by Wittgenstein, the limits of language indicate the limits of the world, and not the other way around. \n ","PeriodicalId":52002,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Filosofia Aurora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wittgenstein and the sciences\",\"authors\":\"Léo Peruzzo Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein states that man has the ability to construct languages with which all meanings may be expressed, but that it is humanly impossible to immediately extract its logic from it. Thus, language is a costume that disguises thought while proposition is a figuration of reality. This paper is aimed at showing how the position of the Tractatus in relation to sciences puts aside the idea that scientific knowledge should be rooted in raw data, that is, observations that may be made regardless of any theoretical orientation. Accordingly, this study claims that the Tractarian position does not admit the presumption that behind raw data there is a reality that is independent of the observer, considering that, as stated by Wittgenstein, the limits of language indicate the limits of the world, and not the other way around. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":52002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Filosofia Aurora\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Filosofia Aurora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Filosofia Aurora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.34.063.ds09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维特根斯坦在《逻辑哲学大全》中指出,人有能力构建语言,用以表达所有意义,但人类不可能立即从中提取其逻辑。因此,语言是伪装思想的服装,命题是现实的形象。本文旨在展示Tractatus在科学中的地位如何抛弃科学知识应植根于原始数据的观点,即无论任何理论方向如何,都可以进行的观察。因此,本研究声称,考虑到正如维特根斯坦所说,语言的局限性表明了世界的局限性,而不是相反,Tractarian的立场不承认原始数据背后有一个独立于观察者的现实的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wittgenstein and the sciences
In the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein states that man has the ability to construct languages with which all meanings may be expressed, but that it is humanly impossible to immediately extract its logic from it. Thus, language is a costume that disguises thought while proposition is a figuration of reality. This paper is aimed at showing how the position of the Tractatus in relation to sciences puts aside the idea that scientific knowledge should be rooted in raw data, that is, observations that may be made regardless of any theoretical orientation. Accordingly, this study claims that the Tractarian position does not admit the presumption that behind raw data there is a reality that is independent of the observer, considering that, as stated by Wittgenstein, the limits of language indicate the limits of the world, and not the other way around.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Filosofia: Aurora (Qualis A2) is a quarterly publication of the Graduate Program in Philosophy of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR). It has published, since 1988, research findings with the purpose of contributing to the training and activity of philosophers and other professionals in related fields. The Revista de Filosofia Aurora (Journal of Philosophy Aurora) publishes scientific articles, reviews, and interviews by adopting the peer review process among members of the editorial board and the specialized scientific community in a double-blind review, i.e., both the names of the reviewers and of the authors are not disclosed. The abbreviated title of the journal is Rev. Filos. Aurora and it is used in bibliographies, references, footnotes, and bibliographic legends.
期刊最新文献
canto da sereIA Por uma etnografia do poder na inteligência artificial, no capitalismo de vigilância e no colonialismo digital Devir, rizoma e transversalidade em Cyberpunk 2077 IAs Generativas Sobre Superman em Super Pride
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1