胸腔镜和ESOS在预测胸科手术后疗效中的作用

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148
Islam Morsy, Amr A Abdelwahab, Heba Salem, M. Elsharkawy, Hussein Gamal Almawardy
{"title":"胸腔镜和ESOS在预测胸科手术后疗效中的作用","authors":"Islam Morsy, Amr A Abdelwahab, Heba Salem, M. Elsharkawy, Hussein Gamal Almawardy","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The use of scores in thoracic surgery has been done recently. European Society Objective Score (ESOS) and Thoracoscore are the most popular scores used in thoracic operations. This work aimed to compare ESOS and Thoracoscore’s ability in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgery. Methods This retrospective study involved 282 cases who were admitted to thoracic surgery unit, Tanta University Hospitals and other hospitals whose Thoracoscore and ESOS were calculated from January 2017 to December 2022. Results Mortality rate at 30 days postoperative was 7.44% in our study. Pneumonectomy and MV (mechanical ventilation) were significantly associated with mortality (P value < 0.001). Thoracoscore can predict mortality (P value = 0.004 and AUC = 0.629) with 61.9% sensitivity, 56.70% specificity, 10.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 94.9% negative predictive value(NPV). ESOS can predict mortality (P value = 0.006 and AUC = 0.662) with 85.71% sensitivity, 37.55% specificity, 9.9% PPV and 97% NPV. ESOS was an independent significant predictor for mortality while Thoracoscore was not. Conclusions ESOS and Thoracoscore are applicable tools in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgeries. However, ESOS is more sensitive and more specific.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Thoracoscore and ESOS in Prediction of Outcomes after Thoracic Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Islam Morsy, Amr A Abdelwahab, Heba Salem, M. Elsharkawy, Hussein Gamal Almawardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background The use of scores in thoracic surgery has been done recently. European Society Objective Score (ESOS) and Thoracoscore are the most popular scores used in thoracic operations. This work aimed to compare ESOS and Thoracoscore’s ability in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgery. Methods This retrospective study involved 282 cases who were admitted to thoracic surgery unit, Tanta University Hospitals and other hospitals whose Thoracoscore and ESOS were calculated from January 2017 to December 2022. Results Mortality rate at 30 days postoperative was 7.44% in our study. Pneumonectomy and MV (mechanical ventilation) were significantly associated with mortality (P value < 0.001). Thoracoscore can predict mortality (P value = 0.004 and AUC = 0.629) with 61.9% sensitivity, 56.70% specificity, 10.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 94.9% negative predictive value(NPV). ESOS can predict mortality (P value = 0.006 and AUC = 0.662) with 85.71% sensitivity, 37.55% specificity, 9.9% PPV and 97% NPV. ESOS was an independent significant predictor for mortality while Thoracoscore was not. Conclusions ESOS and Thoracoscore are applicable tools in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgeries. However, ESOS is more sensitive and more specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of Thoracoscore and ESOS in Prediction of Outcomes after Thoracic Surgeries
ABSTRACT Background The use of scores in thoracic surgery has been done recently. European Society Objective Score (ESOS) and Thoracoscore are the most popular scores used in thoracic operations. This work aimed to compare ESOS and Thoracoscore’s ability in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgery. Methods This retrospective study involved 282 cases who were admitted to thoracic surgery unit, Tanta University Hospitals and other hospitals whose Thoracoscore and ESOS were calculated from January 2017 to December 2022. Results Mortality rate at 30 days postoperative was 7.44% in our study. Pneumonectomy and MV (mechanical ventilation) were significantly associated with mortality (P value < 0.001). Thoracoscore can predict mortality (P value = 0.004 and AUC = 0.629) with 61.9% sensitivity, 56.70% specificity, 10.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 94.9% negative predictive value(NPV). ESOS can predict mortality (P value = 0.006 and AUC = 0.662) with 85.71% sensitivity, 37.55% specificity, 9.9% PPV and 97% NPV. ESOS was an independent significant predictor for mortality while Thoracoscore was not. Conclusions ESOS and Thoracoscore are applicable tools in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgeries. However, ESOS is more sensitive and more specific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1