农民金融六大神话

R. Kamp
{"title":"农民金融六大神话","authors":"R. Kamp","doi":"10.3362/1755-1986.15-00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits some of the most often held assumptions around smallholder finance, and presents field experiences and research challenging these ‘myths’ around supply and demand of agri-finance. On the credit supply side, the article finds that smallholders do not necessarily lack access to ‘finance’, but do not use formal bank loans much and rely more on informal lending. It argues that the characterization of informal moneylenders as usurious is overly simplistic, and sees clear market mechanisms at play in informal lending. The article also presents evidence that the agri sector is riskier than others sectors. On the demand side, evidence suggests that farmers do not always want to apply fertilizer to their farms, or even take out a loan if it were available. Finally, the opinion that farmers deserve a fair (low) interest rate is investigated. In conclusion, the article provides recommendations to policymakers and project designers about approaching agri-finance as a new product in an existing m...","PeriodicalId":39025,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise Development and Microfinance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six myths of farmer finance\",\"authors\":\"R. Kamp\",\"doi\":\"10.3362/1755-1986.15-00043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article revisits some of the most often held assumptions around smallholder finance, and presents field experiences and research challenging these ‘myths’ around supply and demand of agri-finance. On the credit supply side, the article finds that smallholders do not necessarily lack access to ‘finance’, but do not use formal bank loans much and rely more on informal lending. It argues that the characterization of informal moneylenders as usurious is overly simplistic, and sees clear market mechanisms at play in informal lending. The article also presents evidence that the agri sector is riskier than others sectors. On the demand side, evidence suggests that farmers do not always want to apply fertilizer to their farms, or even take out a loan if it were available. Finally, the opinion that farmers deserve a fair (low) interest rate is investigated. In conclusion, the article provides recommendations to policymakers and project designers about approaching agri-finance as a new product in an existing m...\",\"PeriodicalId\":39025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enterprise Development and Microfinance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enterprise Development and Microfinance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.15-00043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise Development and Microfinance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.15-00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文回顾了关于小农融资的一些最常见的假设,并提出了挑战这些关于农业融资供需的“神话”的实地经验和研究。在信贷供给方面,这篇文章发现,小农不一定缺乏获得“融资”的途径,但他们很少使用正规银行贷款,而是更多地依赖非正式贷款。报告认为,将非正规放贷者定性为高利贷者过于简单化,并认为在非正规贷款中有明确的市场机制在起作用。这篇文章还提供了证据,表明农业部门比其他部门风险更大。在需求方面,有证据表明,农民并不总是想给他们的农场施肥,甚至在有贷款的情况下也不愿意贷款。最后,对农民应该获得公平(低)利率的观点进行了调查。最后,本文为政策制定者和项目设计者提供了一些建议,建议他们如何将农业金融作为一种新产品引入现有的金融体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Six myths of farmer finance
This article revisits some of the most often held assumptions around smallholder finance, and presents field experiences and research challenging these ‘myths’ around supply and demand of agri-finance. On the credit supply side, the article finds that smallholders do not necessarily lack access to ‘finance’, but do not use formal bank loans much and rely more on informal lending. It argues that the characterization of informal moneylenders as usurious is overly simplistic, and sees clear market mechanisms at play in informal lending. The article also presents evidence that the agri sector is riskier than others sectors. On the demand side, evidence suggests that farmers do not always want to apply fertilizer to their farms, or even take out a loan if it were available. Finally, the opinion that farmers deserve a fair (low) interest rate is investigated. In conclusion, the article provides recommendations to policymakers and project designers about approaching agri-finance as a new product in an existing m...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Enterprise Development and Microfinance
Enterprise Development and Microfinance Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: EDM encourages critical thinking on how market systems can be more inclusive and sustainable, with concrete implications for designing, implementing, and evaluating business support programmes. EDM is essential reading for practitioners, researchers, donors, policymakers, and finance specialists engaged in market-related activities involving poor people in the global South. The coverage includes but is not restricted to: • Financial inclusion (inclusive financial services and products) • Emerging financing models (impact investment, responsible finance, social lending) • Value chain analysis and development • Inclusive business models • Equity (gender, youth, marginalized) in access to financial services and value chains • Political and regulatory framework for SME development and financial services • ICT for business development and financial services • Sustainability standards • Advisory services for SMEs • Impact assessment.
期刊最新文献
Sustainability of youth self-employment schemes in Central Gondar, Amhara, Ethiopia The use of fintech in microfinance: the fight against poverty globally and in Egypt Greater Rural Opportunities for Women (GROW): A multifaceted approach to poverty alleviation at scale Efficiency and competitiveness of a South Africa grant support programme for small, medium, and micro-sized enterprises Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1