{"title":"拉丁美洲殖民地?将菲律宾和西班牙太平洋纳入拉丁美洲殖民研究的案例","authors":"Kristie Patricia Flannery","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"hosted a conference last year that brought together a small group of scholars to discuss Iberian Asia; to take stock of recent work and to ponder the future directions of research exploring the Spanish and Portuguese ‘ presence ’ in this world region in the six-teenth and seventeenth centuries. What is striking about this meeting is that it centered on the question of whether an Iberian Asia ever existed. The organizers asked, ‘ Can we conceive of an Iberian Asia just as some historians have recently done for the Iberian Atlantic? ’ They shunned the term ‘ colonial ’ and spoke of ‘ Iberian societies ’ rather than Iberian colonies. 1 A reluctance to categorize Asia ’ s littorals zones, islands, seas, and peoples as colonized, or at least colonized by Spain and Portugal, is deeply rooted in a long and vibrant postco-lonial intellectual tradition. The historiography of the Philippines frames the archipelago as a frontier zone that a weak Spain never succeeded in conquering. In the 1970s and 1980s, Reynaldo Clemeña Ileto ’ s (1979) and Vicente Rafael ’ s (1988) respective monographs recovered Indigenous Filipino resistance to Spanish colonialism, from mass armed revolts against governments and the powerful friars, to those rebellions more subtly embedded in and enacted through language and translation. William Henry Scott (1974) and James C. Scott (2009) documented the Spanish conquistadors ’ and their Indigenous allies ’ futile e ff orts to dominate the Philippines ’ mountainous high-altitude zones. Arche-ological studies of the cordillera ’ s rice terraces have turned up more proof that multiethnic cimarrones fl ed the lowlands for the mountains to evade colonial rule, adding layers of evidence to what historians have mined from the empire ’ s paper archives (Acabado et al. 2019). More recently, John D. Blanco (2021) argued that Spain also failed to conquer the Philippines lowlands. Painting a picture of con fl ict rather than control, he emphasized how active missions were zones of protracted war. For Blanco, Spanish authority was weak even in Manila, the capital","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"235 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonial Latin Asia? The case for incorporating the Philippines and the Spanish Pacific into colonial Latin American studies\",\"authors\":\"Kristie Patricia Flannery\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10609164.2023.2205233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"hosted a conference last year that brought together a small group of scholars to discuss Iberian Asia; to take stock of recent work and to ponder the future directions of research exploring the Spanish and Portuguese ‘ presence ’ in this world region in the six-teenth and seventeenth centuries. What is striking about this meeting is that it centered on the question of whether an Iberian Asia ever existed. The organizers asked, ‘ Can we conceive of an Iberian Asia just as some historians have recently done for the Iberian Atlantic? ’ They shunned the term ‘ colonial ’ and spoke of ‘ Iberian societies ’ rather than Iberian colonies. 1 A reluctance to categorize Asia ’ s littorals zones, islands, seas, and peoples as colonized, or at least colonized by Spain and Portugal, is deeply rooted in a long and vibrant postco-lonial intellectual tradition. The historiography of the Philippines frames the archipelago as a frontier zone that a weak Spain never succeeded in conquering. In the 1970s and 1980s, Reynaldo Clemeña Ileto ’ s (1979) and Vicente Rafael ’ s (1988) respective monographs recovered Indigenous Filipino resistance to Spanish colonialism, from mass armed revolts against governments and the powerful friars, to those rebellions more subtly embedded in and enacted through language and translation. William Henry Scott (1974) and James C. Scott (2009) documented the Spanish conquistadors ’ and their Indigenous allies ’ futile e ff orts to dominate the Philippines ’ mountainous high-altitude zones. Arche-ological studies of the cordillera ’ s rice terraces have turned up more proof that multiethnic cimarrones fl ed the lowlands for the mountains to evade colonial rule, adding layers of evidence to what historians have mined from the empire ’ s paper archives (Acabado et al. 2019). More recently, John D. Blanco (2021) argued that Spain also failed to conquer the Philippines lowlands. Painting a picture of con fl ict rather than control, he emphasized how active missions were zones of protracted war. For Blanco, Spanish authority was weak even in Manila, the capital\",\"PeriodicalId\":44336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colonial Latin American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2023.2205233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
去年主持了一次会议,召集了一小群学者讨论伊比利亚亚洲;盘点最近的工作,思考未来的研究方向,探索西班牙和葡萄牙在16世纪和17世纪在这个世界地区的“存在”。这次会议的惊人之处在于,它的中心问题是伊比利亚亚洲是否曾经存在过。组织者问道:“我们能否设想一个伊比利亚亚洲,就像一些历史学家最近设想的伊比利亚大西洋一样?”他们避免使用“殖民地”这个词,而使用“伊比利亚社会”而不是“伊比利亚殖民地”。不愿将亚洲沿海地区、岛屿、海洋和人民归类为殖民地,或至少是西班牙和葡萄牙的殖民地,这深深植根于一种长期而充满活力的后殖民主义思想传统。菲律宾的史学把这个群岛描绘成一个边界地带,弱小的西班牙从未成功征服过它。在20世纪70年代和80年代,Reynaldo Clemeña Ileto(1979)和Vicente Rafael(1988)各自的专著恢复了菲律宾土著对西班牙殖民主义的抵抗,从大规模武装反抗政府和强大的修士,到那些更微妙地嵌入并通过语言和翻译实施的反抗。威廉·亨利·斯科特(1974)和詹姆斯·c·斯科特(2009)记录了西班牙征服者和他们的土著盟友徒劳地试图统治菲律宾的山区高海拔地区。对科迪勒拉水稻梯田的考古研究发现了更多的证据,证明多民族的契马隆人为了逃避殖民统治而逃离低地,为历史学家从帝国的纸质档案中挖掘出来的证据提供了更多的证据(acaabado et al. 2019)。最近,John D. Blanco(2021)认为西班牙也未能征服菲律宾低地。他描绘了一幅冲突而非控制的画面,强调活跃的任务是旷日持久的战争区域。对布兰科来说,即使在首都马尼拉,西班牙的权威也很弱
Colonial Latin Asia? The case for incorporating the Philippines and the Spanish Pacific into colonial Latin American studies
hosted a conference last year that brought together a small group of scholars to discuss Iberian Asia; to take stock of recent work and to ponder the future directions of research exploring the Spanish and Portuguese ‘ presence ’ in this world region in the six-teenth and seventeenth centuries. What is striking about this meeting is that it centered on the question of whether an Iberian Asia ever existed. The organizers asked, ‘ Can we conceive of an Iberian Asia just as some historians have recently done for the Iberian Atlantic? ’ They shunned the term ‘ colonial ’ and spoke of ‘ Iberian societies ’ rather than Iberian colonies. 1 A reluctance to categorize Asia ’ s littorals zones, islands, seas, and peoples as colonized, or at least colonized by Spain and Portugal, is deeply rooted in a long and vibrant postco-lonial intellectual tradition. The historiography of the Philippines frames the archipelago as a frontier zone that a weak Spain never succeeded in conquering. In the 1970s and 1980s, Reynaldo Clemeña Ileto ’ s (1979) and Vicente Rafael ’ s (1988) respective monographs recovered Indigenous Filipino resistance to Spanish colonialism, from mass armed revolts against governments and the powerful friars, to those rebellions more subtly embedded in and enacted through language and translation. William Henry Scott (1974) and James C. Scott (2009) documented the Spanish conquistadors ’ and their Indigenous allies ’ futile e ff orts to dominate the Philippines ’ mountainous high-altitude zones. Arche-ological studies of the cordillera ’ s rice terraces have turned up more proof that multiethnic cimarrones fl ed the lowlands for the mountains to evade colonial rule, adding layers of evidence to what historians have mined from the empire ’ s paper archives (Acabado et al. 2019). More recently, John D. Blanco (2021) argued that Spain also failed to conquer the Philippines lowlands. Painting a picture of con fl ict rather than control, he emphasized how active missions were zones of protracted war. For Blanco, Spanish authority was weak even in Manila, the capital
期刊介绍:
Colonial Latin American Review (CLAR) is a unique interdisciplinary journal devoted to the study of the colonial period in Latin America. The journal was created in 1992, in response to the growing scholarly interest in colonial themes related to the Quincentenary. CLAR offers a critical forum where scholars can exchange ideas, revise traditional areas of inquiry and chart new directions of research. With the conviction that this dialogue will enrich the emerging field of Latin American colonial studies, CLAR offers a variety of scholarly approaches and formats, including articles, debates, review-essays and book reviews.