家庭之外的家庭福利:英国代际实践和财政支持交流

T. Burchardt, F. Steele, E. Grundy, E. Karagiannaki, J. Kuha, I. Moustaki, C. Skinner, Nina Zhang, Siliang Zhang
{"title":"家庭之外的家庭福利:英国代际实践和财政支持交流","authors":"T. Burchardt, F. Steele, E. Grundy, E. Karagiannaki, J. Kuha, I. Moustaki, C. Skinner, Nina Zhang, Siliang Zhang","doi":"10.31389/lseppr.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Families extend well beyond households. In particular, connections between parents and their adult offspring are often close and sustained, and transfers may include financial assistance, practical support, or both, provided by either generation to the other. Yet this major engine of welfare production, distribution, and redistribution has only recently become the focus of research. Who are the beneficiaries and to what extent are the patterns of exchange socially stratified? This article discusses findings from a programme of research analysing data from two nationally representative longitudinal studies, the British Household Panel Study and its successor Understanding Society, which record help given by, and received by, respondents through exchanges with their non-coresident parents and offspring in the UK. Some families exhibit a high tendency to provide mutual support between generations; these tendencies persist over time. Financial and practical support are generally complementary rather than substitutes. Longer travel time between parents and their offspring makes the provision of practical help less likely, whilst social class, social mobility, and ethnicity exhibit complex patterns of association with intergenerational exchanges. The resulting conclusion is that exchanges within families are an important complement to formal welfare institutions in the UK and that social policies should be designed to work with the grain of existing patterns of exchange, enabling family members to continue to provide help to one another, but ensuring that those who are less well supported by intergenerational assistance can access effective social protection. JEL Codes: D15, I3","PeriodicalId":93332,"journal":{"name":"LSE public policy review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welfare within Families beyond Households: Intergenerational Exchanges of Practical and Financial Support in the UK\",\"authors\":\"T. Burchardt, F. Steele, E. Grundy, E. Karagiannaki, J. Kuha, I. Moustaki, C. Skinner, Nina Zhang, Siliang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/lseppr.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Families extend well beyond households. In particular, connections between parents and their adult offspring are often close and sustained, and transfers may include financial assistance, practical support, or both, provided by either generation to the other. Yet this major engine of welfare production, distribution, and redistribution has only recently become the focus of research. Who are the beneficiaries and to what extent are the patterns of exchange socially stratified? This article discusses findings from a programme of research analysing data from two nationally representative longitudinal studies, the British Household Panel Study and its successor Understanding Society, which record help given by, and received by, respondents through exchanges with their non-coresident parents and offspring in the UK. Some families exhibit a high tendency to provide mutual support between generations; these tendencies persist over time. Financial and practical support are generally complementary rather than substitutes. Longer travel time between parents and their offspring makes the provision of practical help less likely, whilst social class, social mobility, and ethnicity exhibit complex patterns of association with intergenerational exchanges. The resulting conclusion is that exchanges within families are an important complement to formal welfare institutions in the UK and that social policies should be designed to work with the grain of existing patterns of exchange, enabling family members to continue to provide help to one another, but ensuring that those who are less well supported by intergenerational assistance can access effective social protection. JEL Codes: D15, I3\",\"PeriodicalId\":93332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSE public policy review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSE public policy review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE public policy review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭远远超出家庭。特别是,父母与其成年子女之间的联系往往是密切和持续的,转移可能包括经济援助、实际支持,或两者兼而有之,由任何一代向另一代提供。然而,这个福利生产、分配和再分配的主要引擎直到最近才成为研究的焦点。谁是受益者,交换模式在多大程度上是社会分层的?本文讨论了一项研究计划的结果,该研究分析了两项具有全国代表性的纵向研究的数据,即英国家庭小组研究及其后续的理解协会,该研究记录了受访者通过与英国非共同父母和后代交流而给予和接受的帮助。一些家庭表现出在代际之间提供相互支持的高度倾向;这些趋势会随着时间的推移而持续。财政和实际支助通常是相辅相成的,而不是替代的。父母和子女之间的旅行时间越长,提供实际帮助的可能性就越小,而社会阶层、社会流动性和种族则表现出与代际交流相关的复杂模式。由此得出的结论是,家庭内部的交流是对英国正式福利机构的重要补充,社会政策的设计应与现有的交流模式相结合,使家庭成员能够继续相互帮助,但要确保那些得不到代际援助的人能够获得有效的社会保护。JEL代码:D15、I3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Welfare within Families beyond Households: Intergenerational Exchanges of Practical and Financial Support in the UK
Families extend well beyond households. In particular, connections between parents and their adult offspring are often close and sustained, and transfers may include financial assistance, practical support, or both, provided by either generation to the other. Yet this major engine of welfare production, distribution, and redistribution has only recently become the focus of research. Who are the beneficiaries and to what extent are the patterns of exchange socially stratified? This article discusses findings from a programme of research analysing data from two nationally representative longitudinal studies, the British Household Panel Study and its successor Understanding Society, which record help given by, and received by, respondents through exchanges with their non-coresident parents and offspring in the UK. Some families exhibit a high tendency to provide mutual support between generations; these tendencies persist over time. Financial and practical support are generally complementary rather than substitutes. Longer travel time between parents and their offspring makes the provision of practical help less likely, whilst social class, social mobility, and ethnicity exhibit complex patterns of association with intergenerational exchanges. The resulting conclusion is that exchanges within families are an important complement to formal welfare institutions in the UK and that social policies should be designed to work with the grain of existing patterns of exchange, enabling family members to continue to provide help to one another, but ensuring that those who are less well supported by intergenerational assistance can access effective social protection. JEL Codes: D15, I3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The International System in the Shadow of the Russian War in Ukraine Who Supports the War? And Who Protests? The Legacies of Tzarist Social Divide in Russia After Merkel: Germany from Peace to War Weaponised Energy and Climate Change: Assessing Europe’s Response to the Ukraine War Europe and Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: Where Does the EU Stand?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1