西澳大利亚州择期结直肠手术后增强恢复的实践调查

Z. Ng, M. Theophilus
{"title":"西澳大利亚州择期结直肠手术后增强恢复的实践调查","authors":"Z. Ng, M. Theophilus","doi":"10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_3_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a 24-item multidisciplinary questionnaire program designed to optimize the patient's perioperative care to reduce postoperative morbidity. However, its adoption remains largely influenced by region and the institution and surgeons' personal judgement. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the practice of ERAS in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia through a survey. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: The survey was sent to all surgeons identified to be performing routine elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was designed based on the latest ERAS guidelines, consisting of questions on the demographics of the surgeons, annual number of major colorectal resections, and on various aspects of pre-, intra- and postoperative practices. The questionnaire was sent through email or handed to the surgeons in August 2020 for a period of 2 months. Sample Size: Twenty-four eligible surgeons participated in the survey. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was to investigate the areas of agreement and difference in ERAS practice in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. Results: Twenty of the 24 eligible surgeons (83.3%) completed the questionnaire. Among these, 65% surgeons perform >50 major colorectal resections annually. There is a high agreement of the practice in certain areas: 70% surgeons perform >50% of their cases laparoscopically; they do not routinely use nasogastric tubes, majority of the surgeons do not routinely place drains after right (95%) and left (70%) colonic surgeries, 75% surgeons are guided by the Acute Pain Service for postoperative analgesia, and 95% surgeons encourage early mobilization. A few areas of practice remain widely variable: preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, postoperative fluids and electrolytes, and assessment of gut function. Conclusion: This survey provides a snapshot of the practice of ERAS in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. While certain aspects are considered as universal practice, there are some gaps and barriers to implementation that need to explored further. Limitations: The survey did not classify questions into open or laparoscopic surgery, and some surgeons worked both in public and private institutions, where practices may differ.","PeriodicalId":90396,"journal":{"name":"World journal of colorectal surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on the practice of enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia\",\"authors\":\"Z. Ng, M. Theophilus\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_3_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a 24-item multidisciplinary questionnaire program designed to optimize the patient's perioperative care to reduce postoperative morbidity. However, its adoption remains largely influenced by region and the institution and surgeons' personal judgement. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the practice of ERAS in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia through a survey. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: The survey was sent to all surgeons identified to be performing routine elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was designed based on the latest ERAS guidelines, consisting of questions on the demographics of the surgeons, annual number of major colorectal resections, and on various aspects of pre-, intra- and postoperative practices. The questionnaire was sent through email or handed to the surgeons in August 2020 for a period of 2 months. Sample Size: Twenty-four eligible surgeons participated in the survey. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was to investigate the areas of agreement and difference in ERAS practice in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. Results: Twenty of the 24 eligible surgeons (83.3%) completed the questionnaire. Among these, 65% surgeons perform >50 major colorectal resections annually. There is a high agreement of the practice in certain areas: 70% surgeons perform >50% of their cases laparoscopically; they do not routinely use nasogastric tubes, majority of the surgeons do not routinely place drains after right (95%) and left (70%) colonic surgeries, 75% surgeons are guided by the Acute Pain Service for postoperative analgesia, and 95% surgeons encourage early mobilization. A few areas of practice remain widely variable: preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, postoperative fluids and electrolytes, and assessment of gut function. Conclusion: This survey provides a snapshot of the practice of ERAS in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. While certain aspects are considered as universal practice, there are some gaps and barriers to implementation that need to explored further. Limitations: The survey did not classify questions into open or laparoscopic surgery, and some surgeons worked both in public and private institutions, where practices may differ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of colorectal surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of colorectal surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_3_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of colorectal surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_3_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加强术后恢复(ERAS)是一项24项多学科问卷调查项目,旨在优化患者围手术期护理以减少术后发病率。然而,它的采用在很大程度上仍受地区、机构和外科医生个人判断的影响。目的:本研究旨在通过一项调查来评价ERAS在西澳大利亚州择期结直肠手术中的应用。设计:前瞻性调查。背景:调查被发送到所有在西澳大利亚州进行常规择期结肠直肠手术的外科医生。患者和方法:根据最新的ERAS指南设计了一份调查问卷,包括外科医生的人口统计学问题,每年大肠癌切除术的数量,以及术前,术中和术后实践的各个方面。问卷于2020年8月通过电子邮件发送或交给外科医生,为期2个月。样本量:24名符合条件的外科医生参与调查。主要结果测量:主要结果是调查西澳大利亚州选择性结直肠手术中ERAS实践的一致和差异。结果:24名符合条件的外科医生中有20名(83.3%)完成了问卷调查。其中,65%的外科医生每年进行50例大肠癌切除术。在某些领域,这种做法是高度一致的:70%的外科医生进行腹腔镜手术,50%的病例进行腹腔镜手术;他们没有常规使用鼻胃管,大多数外科医生在右(95%)和左(70%)结肠手术后没有常规放置引流管,75%的外科医生在急性疼痛服务的指导下进行术后镇痛,95%的外科医生鼓励早期活动。一些实践领域仍然存在很大的差异:术前机械肠道准备,术后液体和电解质,以及肠道功能的评估。结论:这项调查提供了在西澳大利亚州选择性结直肠手术中ERAS实践的快照。虽然某些方面被认为是普遍做法,但在执行方面仍有一些差距和障碍需要进一步探讨。局限性:调查没有将问题分类为开放手术或腹腔镜手术,一些外科医生同时在公立和私立机构工作,这两个机构的做法可能不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey on the practice of enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia
Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a 24-item multidisciplinary questionnaire program designed to optimize the patient's perioperative care to reduce postoperative morbidity. However, its adoption remains largely influenced by region and the institution and surgeons' personal judgement. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the practice of ERAS in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia through a survey. Design: Prospective survey. Setting: The survey was sent to all surgeons identified to be performing routine elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was designed based on the latest ERAS guidelines, consisting of questions on the demographics of the surgeons, annual number of major colorectal resections, and on various aspects of pre-, intra- and postoperative practices. The questionnaire was sent through email or handed to the surgeons in August 2020 for a period of 2 months. Sample Size: Twenty-four eligible surgeons participated in the survey. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was to investigate the areas of agreement and difference in ERAS practice in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. Results: Twenty of the 24 eligible surgeons (83.3%) completed the questionnaire. Among these, 65% surgeons perform >50 major colorectal resections annually. There is a high agreement of the practice in certain areas: 70% surgeons perform >50% of their cases laparoscopically; they do not routinely use nasogastric tubes, majority of the surgeons do not routinely place drains after right (95%) and left (70%) colonic surgeries, 75% surgeons are guided by the Acute Pain Service for postoperative analgesia, and 95% surgeons encourage early mobilization. A few areas of practice remain widely variable: preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, postoperative fluids and electrolytes, and assessment of gut function. Conclusion: This survey provides a snapshot of the practice of ERAS in elective colorectal surgery in Western Australia. While certain aspects are considered as universal practice, there are some gaps and barriers to implementation that need to explored further. Limitations: The survey did not classify questions into open or laparoscopic surgery, and some surgeons worked both in public and private institutions, where practices may differ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy and the effect of endoscopist experience on polyp detection rates at a tertiary referral center A case of acute intestinal obstruction in an infant during the COVID-19 pandemic Anal pruritus: Diagnosis and management Charity colonoscopy event and fund in Singapore: A Novel Method to Raise Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening The structural relationships between quality of life and mental conditions in stoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1