经股截肢患者带锁修复膝关节行走与未锁膝关节行走的补偿步态策略:交叉试验

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Pub Date : 2021-04-21 DOI:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000368
William Sloth, J. Fabricius, A. Pedersen
{"title":"经股截肢患者带锁修复膝关节行走与未锁膝关节行走的补偿步态策略:交叉试验","authors":"William Sloth, J. Fabricius, A. Pedersen","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with a locked prosthetic knee joint (LPKJ) have compromised degree of freedom in leg movement compared with walking with an unlocked prosthetic knee joint (UPKJ), thus presenting a risk for compensatory gait strategies, with risk of lower back pain. The objective was to compare gait strategies in individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with an LPKJ and a UPKJ. Materials and Methods This was a crossover trial. Nine individuals with transfemoral amputation habitually walking with a UPKJ completed an intervention of 1 to 2 weeks of walking with a UPKJ followed by 1 to 2 weeks of walking with an LPKJ. Gait strategies were analyzed after each intervention using three-dimensional gait analysis. The outcome was pelvic and lumbar spinal movement from terminal stance to initial swing in the sagittal and transversal plane. Results The maximum anterior tilt of the pelvis in the sagittal plane and the pelvic rotation shifted from preswing to initial swing in the gait cycle when walking with an LPKJ compared with the UPKJ. Conclusions A compensatory gait strategy was observed among individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with an LPKJ compared with a UPKJ. Studies should investigate the incidence of low back pain in individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with LPKJ compared with those walking with UPKJ.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"159 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensatory Gait Strategies in Persons with Transfemoral Amputations Walking with a Locked Prosthetic Knee Joint Compared with an Unlocked Knee Joint: A Crossover Trial\",\"authors\":\"William Sloth, J. Fabricius, A. Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with a locked prosthetic knee joint (LPKJ) have compromised degree of freedom in leg movement compared with walking with an unlocked prosthetic knee joint (UPKJ), thus presenting a risk for compensatory gait strategies, with risk of lower back pain. The objective was to compare gait strategies in individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with an LPKJ and a UPKJ. Materials and Methods This was a crossover trial. Nine individuals with transfemoral amputation habitually walking with a UPKJ completed an intervention of 1 to 2 weeks of walking with a UPKJ followed by 1 to 2 weeks of walking with an LPKJ. Gait strategies were analyzed after each intervention using three-dimensional gait analysis. The outcome was pelvic and lumbar spinal movement from terminal stance to initial swing in the sagittal and transversal plane. Results The maximum anterior tilt of the pelvis in the sagittal plane and the pelvic rotation shifted from preswing to initial swing in the gait cycle when walking with an LPKJ compared with the UPKJ. Conclusions A compensatory gait strategy was observed among individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with an LPKJ compared with a UPKJ. Studies should investigate the incidence of low back pain in individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with LPKJ compared with those walking with UPKJ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与未锁定的假体膝关节(UPKJ)行走相比,经股截肢患者使用锁定的假体膝关节(LPKJ)行走时腿部运动自由度降低,因此存在代偿性步态策略的风险,并有腰痛的风险。目的是比较使用LPKJ和UPKJ的经股截肢患者的步态策略。材料与方法这是一项交叉试验。9例经股截肢患者习惯性地使用UPKJ行走,完成了1至2周的UPKJ行走干预,随后使用LPKJ行走1至2周。采用三维步态分析对每次干预后的步态策略进行分析。结果是骨盆和腰椎从终末站姿到矢状面和横断面的初始摆动。结果与UPKJ相比,LPKJ行走时骨盆矢状面最大前倾和骨盆旋转在步态周期中由压迫转向初始摆动。结论:与UPKJ相比,经股截肢患者使用LPKJ行走具有代偿性步态策略。研究应调查经股截肢患者行LPKJ与行UPKJ时腰痛的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compensatory Gait Strategies in Persons with Transfemoral Amputations Walking with a Locked Prosthetic Knee Joint Compared with an Unlocked Knee Joint: A Crossover Trial
ABSTRACT Introduction Individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with a locked prosthetic knee joint (LPKJ) have compromised degree of freedom in leg movement compared with walking with an unlocked prosthetic knee joint (UPKJ), thus presenting a risk for compensatory gait strategies, with risk of lower back pain. The objective was to compare gait strategies in individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with an LPKJ and a UPKJ. Materials and Methods This was a crossover trial. Nine individuals with transfemoral amputation habitually walking with a UPKJ completed an intervention of 1 to 2 weeks of walking with a UPKJ followed by 1 to 2 weeks of walking with an LPKJ. Gait strategies were analyzed after each intervention using three-dimensional gait analysis. The outcome was pelvic and lumbar spinal movement from terminal stance to initial swing in the sagittal and transversal plane. Results The maximum anterior tilt of the pelvis in the sagittal plane and the pelvic rotation shifted from preswing to initial swing in the gait cycle when walking with an LPKJ compared with the UPKJ. Conclusions A compensatory gait strategy was observed among individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with an LPKJ compared with a UPKJ. Studies should investigate the incidence of low back pain in individuals with transfemoral amputation walking with LPKJ compared with those walking with UPKJ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Physical Therapy and Orthosis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Blood Pressure Regulation in Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation: Effects of Wearing a Prosthesis Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot Immediate Effect of Soft Lumbosacral Orthosis on Trunk Stability and Upper-Limb Functionality in Children with Cerebral Palsy Importance of Health Policy and Systems Research for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems: A Call to Action to Accelerate Progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1