多尺度模拟栖息地组成和道路对驼鹿损伤发生率和数量的影响

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Silva Fennica Pub Date : 2019-01-10 DOI:10.14214/SF.9918
A. Nikula, V. Nivala, J. Matala, K. Heliövaara
{"title":"多尺度模拟栖息地组成和道路对驼鹿损伤发生率和数量的影响","authors":"A. Nikula, V. Nivala, J. Matala, K. Heliövaara","doi":"10.14214/SF.9918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We modelled the effect of habitat composition and roads on the number and occurrence of moose ( L.) damage in Ostrobothnia and Lapland using a zero-inflated count model. Models were developed for 1 km, 25 km and 100 km landscapes consisting of equilateral rectangular grid cells. Count models predict the number of damage, i.e. the number of plantations and zero models the probability of a landscape being without damage for a given habitat composition. The number of moose damage in neighboring grid cells was a significant predictor in all models. The proportion of mature forest was the most frequent significant variable, and an increasing admixture of mature forests among plantations increased the number and occurrence of damage. The amount of all types of plantations was the second most common significant variable predicting increasing damage along with increasing amount of plantations. An increase in thinning forests as an admixture also increased damage in 1 km landscapes in both areas, whereas an increase in pine-dominated thinning forests in Lapland reduced the number of damage in 25 km landscapes. An increasing amount of inhabited areas in Ostrobothnia and the length of connecting roads in Lapland reduced the number of damage in 1 and 25 km landscapes. Differences in model variables between areas suggest that models of moose damage risk should be adjusted according to characteristics that are specific to the study area.Alces alces222222","PeriodicalId":49520,"journal":{"name":"Silva Fennica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the effect of habitat composition and roads on the occurrence and number of moose damage at multiple scales\",\"authors\":\"A. Nikula, V. Nivala, J. Matala, K. Heliövaara\",\"doi\":\"10.14214/SF.9918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We modelled the effect of habitat composition and roads on the number and occurrence of moose ( L.) damage in Ostrobothnia and Lapland using a zero-inflated count model. Models were developed for 1 km, 25 km and 100 km landscapes consisting of equilateral rectangular grid cells. Count models predict the number of damage, i.e. the number of plantations and zero models the probability of a landscape being without damage for a given habitat composition. The number of moose damage in neighboring grid cells was a significant predictor in all models. The proportion of mature forest was the most frequent significant variable, and an increasing admixture of mature forests among plantations increased the number and occurrence of damage. The amount of all types of plantations was the second most common significant variable predicting increasing damage along with increasing amount of plantations. An increase in thinning forests as an admixture also increased damage in 1 km landscapes in both areas, whereas an increase in pine-dominated thinning forests in Lapland reduced the number of damage in 25 km landscapes. An increasing amount of inhabited areas in Ostrobothnia and the length of connecting roads in Lapland reduced the number of damage in 1 and 25 km landscapes. Differences in model variables between areas suggest that models of moose damage risk should be adjusted according to characteristics that are specific to the study area.Alces alces222222\",\"PeriodicalId\":49520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Silva Fennica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Silva Fennica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14214/SF.9918\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Silva Fennica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14214/SF.9918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们使用零膨胀计数模型模拟了栖息地组成和道路对鸵鸟和拉普兰驼鹿(L.)损伤数量和发生率的影响。为1公里、25公里和100公里的景观开发了模型,这些景观由等边矩形网格单元组成。计数模型预测破坏的数量,即种植园的数量,零模型预测给定栖息地组成的景观没有破坏的概率。在所有模型中,相邻网格细胞中驼鹿损伤的数量都是一个重要的预测因素。成熟林的比例是最常见的显著变量,种植园中成熟林的混合增加了破坏的数量和发生率。所有类型的人工林数量是第二常见的显著变量,预测随着人工林数量的增加,损失也会增加。疏伐森林作为一种混合物的增加也增加了这两个地区1公里景观的破坏,而拉普兰以松树为主的疏伐森林的增加减少了25公里景观的损坏数量。Ostrobothnia有越来越多的居民区和拉普兰连接道路的长度减少了1公里和25公里景观的破坏数量。区域之间模型变量的差异表明,驼鹿损伤风险模型应根据研究区域的具体特征进行调整。Alces alces222222
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling the effect of habitat composition and roads on the occurrence and number of moose damage at multiple scales
We modelled the effect of habitat composition and roads on the number and occurrence of moose ( L.) damage in Ostrobothnia and Lapland using a zero-inflated count model. Models were developed for 1 km, 25 km and 100 km landscapes consisting of equilateral rectangular grid cells. Count models predict the number of damage, i.e. the number of plantations and zero models the probability of a landscape being without damage for a given habitat composition. The number of moose damage in neighboring grid cells was a significant predictor in all models. The proportion of mature forest was the most frequent significant variable, and an increasing admixture of mature forests among plantations increased the number and occurrence of damage. The amount of all types of plantations was the second most common significant variable predicting increasing damage along with increasing amount of plantations. An increase in thinning forests as an admixture also increased damage in 1 km landscapes in both areas, whereas an increase in pine-dominated thinning forests in Lapland reduced the number of damage in 25 km landscapes. An increasing amount of inhabited areas in Ostrobothnia and the length of connecting roads in Lapland reduced the number of damage in 1 and 25 km landscapes. Differences in model variables between areas suggest that models of moose damage risk should be adjusted according to characteristics that are specific to the study area.Alces alces222222
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Silva Fennica
Silva Fennica 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Silva Fennica publishes significant new knowledge on forest sciences. The scope covers research on forestry and forest ecosystems. Silva Fennica aims to increase understanding on forest ecosystems, and sustainable use and conservation of forest resources. Use of forest resources includes all aspects of forestry containing biomass-based and non-timber products, economic and social factors etc.
期刊最新文献
Passion for science Effect of arginine-phosphate addition on early survival and growth of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch Forest management in northern Fennoscandia: the need for solutions that mitigate conflicts during forest regeneration and increase the use of continuous cover forestry Changing climatic drivers of European spruce bark beetle outbreaks: a comparison of locations around the Northern Baltic Sea Within-site adaptation: Growth and mortality of Norway spruce, Scots pine and Silver birch seedlings in different planting positions across a soil moisture gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1