以天南星科(Alocasia odora)植物为寄主共享花序的大花蝇属(双翅目:果蝇科)的共存机制:两种与三种系统的比较

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY Entomological Science Pub Date : 2022-04-26 DOI:10.1111/ens.12506
Masanori J. Toda, Kohei Takenaka Takano, Toru Katoh, Ling Xiao, Jian-Jun Gao, Masako Yafuso
{"title":"以天南星科(Alocasia odora)植物为寄主共享花序的大花蝇属(双翅目:果蝇科)的共存机制:两种与三种系统的比较","authors":"Masanori J. Toda,&nbsp;Kohei Takenaka Takano,&nbsp;Toru Katoh,&nbsp;Ling Xiao,&nbsp;Jian-Jun Gao,&nbsp;Masako Yafuso","doi":"10.1111/ens.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are two pollination-mutualistic systems between <i>Colocasiomyia</i> flies and <i>Alocasia odora</i>. The two systems are different in the number of fly species involved. One is a two-to-one system, where <i>C. xenalocasiae</i> and <i>C. alocasiae</i> share inflorescences/infructescences of <i>A</i>. <i>odora</i> in the Ryukyu Islands (Japan), Taiwan, Guangdong, and Guangxi (China). The other system, which additionally involves the third species, <i>C. grandis</i>, is seen from southern Yunnan (China) to northern Vietnam. To reveal coexistence mechanisms in these systems, we compared breeding habits of the component species between the two- and three-species systems in natural conditions, and undertook a field experiment to test a hypothesis whether oviposition sites of the component species are affected by interference competition between them. The observations under natural conditions confirmed the breeding niche separation of component species in the two-species system: <i>C. xenalocasiae</i> uses mostly the pistillate region of spadix, whereas <i>C. alocasiae</i> uses mostly the staminate region, with partial overlap of their oviposition sites in the lower intermediate region. In the three-species system, however, these two species separated their oviposition sites nearly completely from each other, suggesting that they are excluded from the lower intermediate region by the third species, <i>C. grandis</i>, which monopolizes there. The result of field experiments did not support this hypothesis: neither <i>C. xenalocasiae</i> nor <i>C. alocasiae</i> changed oviposition behavior regardless of the absence or the presence of <i>C. grandis</i>. Therefore, we propose an alternative hypothesis that the oviposition site segregation among the three species has evolved as a consequence of the past and/or ongoing competition of larvae.</p>","PeriodicalId":11745,"journal":{"name":"Entomological Science","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ens.12506","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coexistence mechanisms of Colocasiomyia species (Diptera: Drosophilidae) sharing inflorescences of Alocasia odora (Araceae) as a host plant: Comparison between two- and three-species systems\",\"authors\":\"Masanori J. Toda,&nbsp;Kohei Takenaka Takano,&nbsp;Toru Katoh,&nbsp;Ling Xiao,&nbsp;Jian-Jun Gao,&nbsp;Masako Yafuso\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ens.12506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There are two pollination-mutualistic systems between <i>Colocasiomyia</i> flies and <i>Alocasia odora</i>. The two systems are different in the number of fly species involved. One is a two-to-one system, where <i>C. xenalocasiae</i> and <i>C. alocasiae</i> share inflorescences/infructescences of <i>A</i>. <i>odora</i> in the Ryukyu Islands (Japan), Taiwan, Guangdong, and Guangxi (China). The other system, which additionally involves the third species, <i>C. grandis</i>, is seen from southern Yunnan (China) to northern Vietnam. To reveal coexistence mechanisms in these systems, we compared breeding habits of the component species between the two- and three-species systems in natural conditions, and undertook a field experiment to test a hypothesis whether oviposition sites of the component species are affected by interference competition between them. The observations under natural conditions confirmed the breeding niche separation of component species in the two-species system: <i>C. xenalocasiae</i> uses mostly the pistillate region of spadix, whereas <i>C. alocasiae</i> uses mostly the staminate region, with partial overlap of their oviposition sites in the lower intermediate region. In the three-species system, however, these two species separated their oviposition sites nearly completely from each other, suggesting that they are excluded from the lower intermediate region by the third species, <i>C. grandis</i>, which monopolizes there. The result of field experiments did not support this hypothesis: neither <i>C. xenalocasiae</i> nor <i>C. alocasiae</i> changed oviposition behavior regardless of the absence or the presence of <i>C. grandis</i>. Therefore, we propose an alternative hypothesis that the oviposition site segregation among the three species has evolved as a consequence of the past and/or ongoing competition of larvae.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entomological Science\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ens.12506\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entomological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ens.12506\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomological Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ens.12506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

异花蝇与异花蝇之间存在着两种相互传粉的系统。这两个系统涉及的蝇类数量不同。一种是二对一的系统,其中C. xenalocasiae和C. alocasiae共享日本琉球群岛、台湾、广东和广西的a . odora的花序/果序。另一个系统,另外包括第三种,C. grandis,见于云南南部到越南北部。为了揭示这些系统中的共存机制,我们比较了两种和三种系统中组成物种在自然条件下的繁殖习性,并进行了实地实验,以验证组成物种的产卵地点是否受到它们之间干扰竞争的影响。在自然条件下的观察证实了两种系统中组成种的繁殖生态位分离:异种瓢虫主要利用花萼雌蕊区,而白花瓢虫主要利用雄蕊区,它们的产卵位置部分重叠在较低的中间区域。然而,在三种系统中,这两个物种几乎完全分开了它们的产卵地点,这表明它们被第三种C. grandis排除在较低的中间区域之外,后者垄断了那里。野外实验的结果并不支持这一假设:无论是否存在大角弓形虫,异种弓形虫和异色弓形虫都不会改变其产卵行为。因此,我们提出了另一种假设,即三种物种之间的产卵地点隔离是幼虫过去和/或正在进行的竞争的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coexistence mechanisms of Colocasiomyia species (Diptera: Drosophilidae) sharing inflorescences of Alocasia odora (Araceae) as a host plant: Comparison between two- and three-species systems

There are two pollination-mutualistic systems between Colocasiomyia flies and Alocasia odora. The two systems are different in the number of fly species involved. One is a two-to-one system, where C. xenalocasiae and C. alocasiae share inflorescences/infructescences of A. odora in the Ryukyu Islands (Japan), Taiwan, Guangdong, and Guangxi (China). The other system, which additionally involves the third species, C. grandis, is seen from southern Yunnan (China) to northern Vietnam. To reveal coexistence mechanisms in these systems, we compared breeding habits of the component species between the two- and three-species systems in natural conditions, and undertook a field experiment to test a hypothesis whether oviposition sites of the component species are affected by interference competition between them. The observations under natural conditions confirmed the breeding niche separation of component species in the two-species system: C. xenalocasiae uses mostly the pistillate region of spadix, whereas C. alocasiae uses mostly the staminate region, with partial overlap of their oviposition sites in the lower intermediate region. In the three-species system, however, these two species separated their oviposition sites nearly completely from each other, suggesting that they are excluded from the lower intermediate region by the third species, C. grandis, which monopolizes there. The result of field experiments did not support this hypothesis: neither C. xenalocasiae nor C. alocasiae changed oviposition behavior regardless of the absence or the presence of C. grandis. Therefore, we propose an alternative hypothesis that the oviposition site segregation among the three species has evolved as a consequence of the past and/or ongoing competition of larvae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Entomological Science
Entomological Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Entomological Science is the official English language journal of the Entomological Society of Japan. The Journal publishes original research papers and reviews from any entomological discipline or from directly allied field in ecology, behavioral biology, physiology, biochemistry, development, genetics, systematics, morphology, evolution and general entomology. Papers of applied entomology will be considered for publication if they significantly advance in the field of entomological science in the opinion of the Editors and Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
A review of the genus Leptopa Zetterstedt, 1838 (Diptera: Scathophagidae) from Japan, with descriptions of two new species Immature stages and natural history of Eruga unilabiana (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), an ectoparasitoid of two linyphiid spiders Finding a nest: Ant-associated silverfish (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) moving outside granivorous Messor nests (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Different habitat use of two Cybister (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) species larvae in a paddy field water system Differences in sampling efficiency of each insect order in yellow pan traps with installation of flight interception windows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1