科普特药物处方的有效性问题

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Trends in Classics Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1515/tc-2021-0005
Anne Grons
{"title":"科普特药物处方的有效性问题","authors":"Anne Grons","doi":"10.1515/tc-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Coptic pharmacological texts offer a multitude of medical prescriptions concerning various afflictions, such as eye or skin irritations, affections of the viscera, or even psychological complaints. The content of these texts is medical, and in most cases bereft of any magical or religious ideas. They usually compile prescriptions according to symptoms and/or afflictions, without any further organising principle. Only a handful of texts are grouped according to the illness or to the medicinal plants used. Almost every prescription follows a pattern, with four formal elements: 1) the medical indication (or purpose), 2) the (basic) ingredients, 3) the procedure and application, and 4) the effects and/or the effectiveness of a remedy, or further information. In this article, I give an overview of the entire corpus of Coptic medical prescriptions, explore the four main elements, and especially the discussions of efficacy. I also examine the material in light of placebo research, to see whether something like a placebo effect may have influenced how the pharmacological texts were formulated.","PeriodicalId":41704,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Classics","volume":"13 1","pages":"122 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Question of the Effectiveness of Coptic Pharmacological Prescriptions\",\"authors\":\"Anne Grons\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tc-2021-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Coptic pharmacological texts offer a multitude of medical prescriptions concerning various afflictions, such as eye or skin irritations, affections of the viscera, or even psychological complaints. The content of these texts is medical, and in most cases bereft of any magical or religious ideas. They usually compile prescriptions according to symptoms and/or afflictions, without any further organising principle. Only a handful of texts are grouped according to the illness or to the medicinal plants used. Almost every prescription follows a pattern, with four formal elements: 1) the medical indication (or purpose), 2) the (basic) ingredients, 3) the procedure and application, and 4) the effects and/or the effectiveness of a remedy, or further information. In this article, I give an overview of the entire corpus of Coptic medical prescriptions, explore the four main elements, and especially the discussions of efficacy. I also examine the material in light of placebo research, to see whether something like a placebo effect may have influenced how the pharmacological texts were formulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Classics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"122 - 153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Classics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tc-2021-0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Classics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tc-2021-0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要科普特药理学文献提供了大量关于各种疾病的医学处方,如眼睛或皮肤刺激、内脏影响,甚至心理问题。这些文本的内容是医学的,在大多数情况下没有任何魔法或宗教思想。他们通常根据症状和/或痛苦编制处方,没有任何进一步的组织原则。只有少数文本根据疾病或使用的药用植物进行分组。几乎每个处方都遵循一种模式,有四个正式要素:1)医学指征(或目的),2)(基本)成分,3)程序和应用,4)药物的效果和/或有效性,或进一步的信息。在这篇文章中,我对科普特医学处方的整个语料库进行了概述,探讨了四个主要要素,尤其是对疗效的讨论。我还根据安慰剂研究检查了这些材料,看看类似安慰剂效应的东西是否影响了药理学文本的制定方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Question of the Effectiveness of Coptic Pharmacological Prescriptions
Abstract Coptic pharmacological texts offer a multitude of medical prescriptions concerning various afflictions, such as eye or skin irritations, affections of the viscera, or even psychological complaints. The content of these texts is medical, and in most cases bereft of any magical or religious ideas. They usually compile prescriptions according to symptoms and/or afflictions, without any further organising principle. Only a handful of texts are grouped according to the illness or to the medicinal plants used. Almost every prescription follows a pattern, with four formal elements: 1) the medical indication (or purpose), 2) the (basic) ingredients, 3) the procedure and application, and 4) the effects and/or the effectiveness of a remedy, or further information. In this article, I give an overview of the entire corpus of Coptic medical prescriptions, explore the four main elements, and especially the discussions of efficacy. I also examine the material in light of placebo research, to see whether something like a placebo effect may have influenced how the pharmacological texts were formulated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Classics
Trends in Classics CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Claretus And the City: The Glossarius, Its Latin Neologisms and Its Reception in Municipal Administrative Texts Second-Century CE Lexicography: Genre or a Literary Current of Language, Politics, and Social Dynamics? A Distorted Lemma: Στεφάκης Ἀθηναῖος ἱερομόναχος and a False Biography of Nicholas of Methone Why a Historical and Theological Lexicon of the Septuagint? Latin Lexicography and Textual Criticism: A Lexical Note on Valerius Flaccus, Argonautica 5.380
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1