运算符优先语言的模型检查器

IF 1.5 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1145/3608443
M. Chiari, D. Mandrioli, Francesco Pontiggia, Matteo Pradella
{"title":"运算符优先语言的模型检查器","authors":"M. Chiari, D. Mandrioli, Francesco Pontiggia, Matteo Pradella","doi":"10.1145/3608443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of extending model checking from finite state machines to procedural programs has fostered much research toward the definition of temporal logics for reasoning on context-free structures. The most notable of such results are temporal logics on Nested Words, such as CaRet and NWTL. Recently, Precedence Oriented Temporal Logic (POTL) has been introduced to specify and prove properties of programs coded trough an Operator Precedence Language (OPL). POTL is complete w.r.t. the FO restriction of the MSO logic previously defined as a logic fully equivalent to OPL. POTL increases NWTL’s expressive power in a perfectly parallel way as OPLs are more powerful that nested words. In this paper we produce a model checker, named POMC, for OPL programs to prove properties expressed in POTL. To the best of our knowledge POMC is the first implemented and openly available model checker for proving tree-structured properties of recursive procedural programs. We also report on the experimental evaluation we performed on POMC on a nontrivial benchmark.","PeriodicalId":50939,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model Checker for Operator Precedence Languages\",\"authors\":\"M. Chiari, D. Mandrioli, Francesco Pontiggia, Matteo Pradella\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3608443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of extending model checking from finite state machines to procedural programs has fostered much research toward the definition of temporal logics for reasoning on context-free structures. The most notable of such results are temporal logics on Nested Words, such as CaRet and NWTL. Recently, Precedence Oriented Temporal Logic (POTL) has been introduced to specify and prove properties of programs coded trough an Operator Precedence Language (OPL). POTL is complete w.r.t. the FO restriction of the MSO logic previously defined as a logic fully equivalent to OPL. POTL increases NWTL’s expressive power in a perfectly parallel way as OPLs are more powerful that nested words. In this paper we produce a model checker, named POMC, for OPL programs to prove properties expressed in POTL. To the best of our knowledge POMC is the first implemented and openly available model checker for proving tree-structured properties of recursive procedural programs. We also report on the experimental evaluation we performed on POMC on a nontrivial benchmark.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3608443\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3608443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将模型检查从有限状态机扩展到程序程序的问题促进了对上下文无关结构上推理的时间逻辑定义的大量研究。这些结果中最值得注意的是嵌套词上的时间逻辑,如插入符号和NWTL。近年来,人们引入了面向优先级的时间逻辑(POTL)来指定和证明通过运算符优先语言(OPL)编码的程序的性质。POTL完全取代了之前定义为与OPL完全等价的逻辑的MSO逻辑的FO限制。POTL以一种完美的并行方式增加了NWTL的表达能力,因为opl比嵌套词更强大。在本文中,我们为OPL程序制作了一个模型检查器,命名为POMC,用于证明用POTL表示的属性。据我们所知,POMC是第一个实现和公开可用的模型检查器,用于证明递归过程程序的树结构属性。我们还报告了我们在一个重要基准上对POMC进行的实验评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Model Checker for Operator Precedence Languages
The problem of extending model checking from finite state machines to procedural programs has fostered much research toward the definition of temporal logics for reasoning on context-free structures. The most notable of such results are temporal logics on Nested Words, such as CaRet and NWTL. Recently, Precedence Oriented Temporal Logic (POTL) has been introduced to specify and prove properties of programs coded trough an Operator Precedence Language (OPL). POTL is complete w.r.t. the FO restriction of the MSO logic previously defined as a logic fully equivalent to OPL. POTL increases NWTL’s expressive power in a perfectly parallel way as OPLs are more powerful that nested words. In this paper we produce a model checker, named POMC, for OPL programs to prove properties expressed in POTL. To the best of our knowledge POMC is the first implemented and openly available model checker for proving tree-structured properties of recursive procedural programs. We also report on the experimental evaluation we performed on POMC on a nontrivial benchmark.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) is the premier journal for reporting recent research advances in the areas of programming languages, and systems to assist the task of programming. Papers can be either theoretical or experimental in style, but in either case, they must contain innovative and novel content that advances the state of the art of programming languages and systems. We also invite strictly experimental papers that compare existing approaches, as well as tutorial and survey papers. The scope of TOPLAS includes, but is not limited to, the following subjects: language design for sequential and parallel programming programming language implementation programming language semantics compilers and interpreters runtime systems for program execution storage allocation and garbage collection languages and methods for writing program specifications languages and methods for secure and reliable programs testing and verification of programs
期刊最新文献
Proving Correctness of Parallel Implementations of Transition System Models CFLOBDDs: Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams Adversities in Abstract Interpretation: Accommodating Robustness by Abstract Interpretation: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems: Vol 0, No ja Homeostasis: Design and Implementation of a Self-Stabilizing Compiler Locally Abstract, Globally Concrete Semantics of Concurrent Programming Languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1