年度和行业层面的会计叙事分析:可读性和音调变异

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI:10.2308/jeta-18-12-21-26
E. Efretuei
{"title":"年度和行业层面的会计叙事分析:可读性和音调变异","authors":"E. Efretuei","doi":"10.2308/jeta-18-12-21-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, I examine variations in the textual complexity of annual report narrative disclosures using the Fog Readability Index and Fin-Neg word list Tone Index given year and industry effects. I analyse accounting narrative Readability and Tone based on firm years, associations between the two narrative measures, and industry data. Tests of the relationship between Readability and Tone show that negative narratives have higher Readability scores, supporting the obfuscation hypothesis that bad news tends to be more difficult to read. A year analysis shows that the negative relationship between Readability and Tone increases in significance over time (2006-2011). An industry analysis shows that the observed obfuscation tends to persist in basic materials; consumer services; financial; technology; and utilities industries. This study shows that considering the effect of variations between industry and firm years can inform annual report textual complexity research and associated empirical analyses.","PeriodicalId":45427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Year and Industry-level Accounting Narrative Analysis: Readability and Tone Variation\",\"authors\":\"E. Efretuei\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jeta-18-12-21-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, I examine variations in the textual complexity of annual report narrative disclosures using the Fog Readability Index and Fin-Neg word list Tone Index given year and industry effects. I analyse accounting narrative Readability and Tone based on firm years, associations between the two narrative measures, and industry data. Tests of the relationship between Readability and Tone show that negative narratives have higher Readability scores, supporting the obfuscation hypothesis that bad news tends to be more difficult to read. A year analysis shows that the negative relationship between Readability and Tone increases in significance over time (2006-2011). An industry analysis shows that the observed obfuscation tends to persist in basic materials; consumer services; financial; technology; and utilities industries. This study shows that considering the effect of variations between industry and firm years can inform annual report textual complexity research and associated empirical analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-18-12-21-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-18-12-21-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在这项研究中,我使用Fog可读性指数和Fin Neg单词列表音调指数考察了年度报告叙述披露的文本复杂性在给定年份和行业影响下的变化。我根据公司年份、两种叙述性指标之间的关联以及行业数据分析了会计叙述的可读性和音调。对可读性和语气之间关系的测试表明,负面叙事的可读性得分更高,这支持了混淆假说,即坏消息往往更难阅读。一项年度分析表明,随着时间的推移(2006-2011年),可读性和音调之间的负相关显著性增加。一项行业分析表明,观察到的混淆倾向于在基本材料中持续存在;消费者服务;财政的技术以及公用事业行业。本研究表明,考虑行业和公司年份之间变化的影响,可以为年报文本复杂性研究和相关的实证分析提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Year and Industry-level Accounting Narrative Analysis: Readability and Tone Variation
In this study, I examine variations in the textual complexity of annual report narrative disclosures using the Fog Readability Index and Fin-Neg word list Tone Index given year and industry effects. I analyse accounting narrative Readability and Tone based on firm years, associations between the two narrative measures, and industry data. Tests of the relationship between Readability and Tone show that negative narratives have higher Readability scores, supporting the obfuscation hypothesis that bad news tends to be more difficult to read. A year analysis shows that the negative relationship between Readability and Tone increases in significance over time (2006-2011). An industry analysis shows that the observed obfuscation tends to persist in basic materials; consumer services; financial; technology; and utilities industries. This study shows that considering the effect of variations between industry and firm years can inform annual report textual complexity research and associated empirical analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
27.80%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Deloitte Canada’s Cocreated ICT Simulation for Advanced Accounting Navigating the Digital Landscape: Unraveling Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Affecting Digital Auditing Readiness in the Malaysian Public Sector A Tableau Teaching Application in Financial Data Analytics to State Local Governments: A Case Study on Louisiana Local Government Large Language Models: An Emerging Technology in Accounting Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1