测试教学规范

IF 1.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Journal of Learner Corpus Research Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win
Tatjana Winter, Elen Le Foll
{"title":"测试教学规范","authors":"Tatjana Winter, Elen Le Foll","doi":"10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four\n conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in\n four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 if-conditionals from French\n school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The\n ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of if-sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL\n textbooks, only 57% of if-conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many\n formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We\n conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of if-conditionals\n that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.","PeriodicalId":29715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the pedagogical norm\",\"authors\":\"Tatjana Winter, Elen Le Foll\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four\\n conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in\\n four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 if-conditionals from French\\n school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The\\n ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of if-sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL\\n textbooks, only 57% of if-conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many\\n formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We\\n conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of if-conditionals\\n that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作为外语的英语教材通常呈现三到四种条件类型的规定性类型学。我们通过比较来自法国学校英语教科书(TEC-Fr)、法语L1学习者英语(OpenCLC-Fr)、网络英语(EnTenTen15-S)和英国英语(BNC-S)的四个样本的620个if-条件句的形式和功能,来研究这种历史悠久的英语教学(ELT)类型学在四种英语中体现的程度。在参考数据中,英语教学类型学所占的if-sentence比例还不到一半。即使在英语教科书中,也只有57%的if条件句符合语法部分明确教授的类型。对于许多形式和功能特征,学习者数据介于教科书和参考数据的分布之间。我们得出的结论是,英语教学类型学需要进行调整,以提供一个更有代表性的条件句描述,重点关注第一语言和第二语言的使用和意义而不是形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing the pedagogical norm
English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 if-conditionals from French school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of if-sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL textbooks, only 57% of if-conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of if-conditionals that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing theory-based models of grammatical complexity in student writing Review of Leńko-Szymańska & Götz (2022): Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research Review of Granger (2021): Perspectives on the L2 Phrasicon: The view from learner corpora The effect of linguistic and extralinguistic features on EFL adverb placement On learner characteristics and why we should model them as latent variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1