对结构应变的集体适应:群体中的同情和问题解决

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Spectrum Pub Date : 2019-11-02 DOI:10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215
M. Sadri, James L. Williams, D. Barber
{"title":"对结构应变的集体适应:群体中的同情和问题解决","authors":"M. Sadri, James L. Williams, D. Barber","doi":"10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Numerous studies have explored group cohesion and social action under stressful circumstances. Several theories such as social identity theory, social categorization theory and grievance theories of social action have specifically addressed this issue. However, Robert Merton's “typology of modes of adaptations” to structural strain has not been effectively applied to studies of group cohesion and social action under stressful circumstances. Most of the applications of this typology have remained within the range of individual decision making. Using a field experiment, this paper explores the applicability of Merton's typology to collective responses to structural strain. The experiment breached the normal expectations of student performance in a college classroom. The analysis of participants' responses revealed not only individual adjustments anticipated in Merton’s model but also a rich repertoire of avoidance and evasion that took place in a collective context; namely: “attitude adjustment (commiseration) and “concerted action” (problem solving). These phenomena are introduced as “intervening variables” capable of mediating individual adaptations to structural strain. The paper discusses implications of the findings and suggests possible paths of future research.","PeriodicalId":47106,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Spectrum","volume":"39 1","pages":"392 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Adaptation to Structural Strain: Commiserating and Problem-Solving in groups\",\"authors\":\"M. Sadri, James L. Williams, D. Barber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Numerous studies have explored group cohesion and social action under stressful circumstances. Several theories such as social identity theory, social categorization theory and grievance theories of social action have specifically addressed this issue. However, Robert Merton's “typology of modes of adaptations” to structural strain has not been effectively applied to studies of group cohesion and social action under stressful circumstances. Most of the applications of this typology have remained within the range of individual decision making. Using a field experiment, this paper explores the applicability of Merton's typology to collective responses to structural strain. The experiment breached the normal expectations of student performance in a college classroom. The analysis of participants' responses revealed not only individual adjustments anticipated in Merton’s model but also a rich repertoire of avoidance and evasion that took place in a collective context; namely: “attitude adjustment (commiseration) and “concerted action” (problem solving). These phenomena are introduced as “intervening variables” capable of mediating individual adaptations to structural strain. The paper discusses implications of the findings and suggests possible paths of future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Spectrum\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"392 - 404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2019.1705215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要许多研究探讨了压力环境下的群体凝聚力和社会行为。社会身份理论、社会分类理论和社会行为的冤屈理论等理论都专门针对这一问题。然而,罗伯特·默顿对结构应变的“适应模式类型学”并没有有效地应用于压力环境下的群体凝聚力和社会行动研究。这种类型学的大多数应用都停留在个人决策的范围内。通过现场实验,本文探讨了默顿类型学对结构应变集体反应的适用性。这个实验违背了人们对学生在大学课堂上表现的正常期望。对参与者反应的分析不仅揭示了默顿模型中预期的个人调整,还揭示了在集体背景下发生的丰富的回避和逃避;即:“态度调整(同情)”和“协同行动”(解决问题)。这些现象被引入作为“干预变量”,能够介导个体对结构应变的适应。本文讨论了这些发现的含义,并提出了未来研究的可能途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collective Adaptation to Structural Strain: Commiserating and Problem-Solving in groups
Abstract Numerous studies have explored group cohesion and social action under stressful circumstances. Several theories such as social identity theory, social categorization theory and grievance theories of social action have specifically addressed this issue. However, Robert Merton's “typology of modes of adaptations” to structural strain has not been effectively applied to studies of group cohesion and social action under stressful circumstances. Most of the applications of this typology have remained within the range of individual decision making. Using a field experiment, this paper explores the applicability of Merton's typology to collective responses to structural strain. The experiment breached the normal expectations of student performance in a college classroom. The analysis of participants' responses revealed not only individual adjustments anticipated in Merton’s model but also a rich repertoire of avoidance and evasion that took place in a collective context; namely: “attitude adjustment (commiseration) and “concerted action” (problem solving). These phenomena are introduced as “intervening variables” capable of mediating individual adaptations to structural strain. The paper discusses implications of the findings and suggests possible paths of future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Sociological Spectrum publishes papers on theoretical, methodological, quantitative and qualitative research, and applied research in areas of sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Department of Error. Social class and informal caregiving for family members with Alzheimer’s disease: the role of economic capital, cultural health capital, and social capital Between biological age and social age: age of marriage and first birth among Arab-Palestinian women in Israel The good, the bad, and the profane: Durkheim and the “strong program” in cultural sociology Why some states bring more laws to the gunfight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1