手外科证据水平的十年趋势。

The Hand Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-13 DOI:10.1177/15589447221093672
Reid E Tompkins, Michael M Polmear, Kyle J Klahs, John P Scanaliato, Leon J Nesti, John C Dunn
{"title":"手外科证据水平的十年趋势。","authors":"Reid E Tompkins, Michael M Polmear, Kyle J Klahs, John P Scanaliato, Leon J Nesti, John C Dunn","doi":"10.1177/15589447221093672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purposes of this study were to analyze the trends in Oxford level of evidence (LOE), LOE of most-cited articles, and association between LOE and journal impact factor (IF) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) over a 10-year period (2009-2018) in 3 prominent hand surgery journals, specifically <i>HAND, Journal of Hand Surgery</i> (<i>American Volume</i>) (<i>JHS</i>), and <i>Journal of Hand Surgery</i> (<i>European Volume</i>) (<i>JHSE</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All articles published from 2009 to 2018 in <i>HAND, JHS</i>, and <i>JHSE</i> were reviewed for assigned or available LOE. Data were pooled and analyzed for trends in LOE; relationship among IF, SJR, and LOE; and citation density.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3921 total publications were tabulated from 2009 to 2018, with the majority of studies being level V (1700, 43%) and fewer studies being level I (146, 4%). Over the 10-year study period, there was no significant change in frequency of level I studies for any journal. <i>HAND</i> trended significantly toward higher LOE, <i>JHS</i> trended toward higher LOE, and <i>JHSE</i> trended toward decreased LOE without significance. Among all journals, the annual number of articles and the average LOE were independent significant predictors of IF and SJR. Statistically significant correlations were found between citation density and LOE for <i>JHS</i> and <i>HAND</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher quality evidence is becoming more prevalent in the hand surgery literature over the past 10 years. Annual articles, average LOE, and level I and II and level IV articles were significant predictors of increasing IF and SJR.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"163-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten-Year Trends in Level of Evidence in Hand Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Reid E Tompkins, Michael M Polmear, Kyle J Klahs, John P Scanaliato, Leon J Nesti, John C Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447221093672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purposes of this study were to analyze the trends in Oxford level of evidence (LOE), LOE of most-cited articles, and association between LOE and journal impact factor (IF) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) over a 10-year period (2009-2018) in 3 prominent hand surgery journals, specifically <i>HAND, Journal of Hand Surgery</i> (<i>American Volume</i>) (<i>JHS</i>), and <i>Journal of Hand Surgery</i> (<i>European Volume</i>) (<i>JHSE</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All articles published from 2009 to 2018 in <i>HAND, JHS</i>, and <i>JHSE</i> were reviewed for assigned or available LOE. Data were pooled and analyzed for trends in LOE; relationship among IF, SJR, and LOE; and citation density.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3921 total publications were tabulated from 2009 to 2018, with the majority of studies being level V (1700, 43%) and fewer studies being level I (146, 4%). Over the 10-year study period, there was no significant change in frequency of level I studies for any journal. <i>HAND</i> trended significantly toward higher LOE, <i>JHS</i> trended toward higher LOE, and <i>JHSE</i> trended toward decreased LOE without significance. Among all journals, the annual number of articles and the average LOE were independent significant predictors of IF and SJR. Statistically significant correlations were found between citation density and LOE for <i>JHS</i> and <i>HAND</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher quality evidence is becoming more prevalent in the hand surgery literature over the past 10 years. Annual articles, average LOE, and level I and II and level IV articles were significant predictors of increasing IF and SJR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hand\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"163-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447221093672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447221093672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是分析3种著名手外科期刊(hand、journal of hand surgery (American Volume) (JHS)和journal of hand surgery (European Volume) (JHSE))在2009-2018年10年间(2009-2018年)的牛津证据水平(LOE)、被引次数最多的文章的LOE趋势,以及LOE与期刊影响因子(IF)和SCImago期刊排名(SJR)之间的关系。方法回顾2009 - 2018年在HAND、JHS和JHSE上发表的所有论文,寻找已分配或可用的LOE。汇总数据并分析LOE趋势;IF、SJR与love的关系;引用密度。结果2009 - 2018年共收录3921篇文献,其中V级研究居多(1700篇,43%),I级研究较少(146篇,4%)。在10年的研究期间,任何期刊的I级研究频率都没有显著变化。HAND显著倾向于更高的LOE, JHS显著倾向于更高的LOE, JHSE显著倾向于降低LOE,但无统计学意义。在所有期刊中,年论文数和平均LOE是IF和SJR的独立显著预测因子。JHS和HAND的被引密度与LOE之间存在显著的相关。结论近10年来,手外科文献的证据质量越来越高。年发文量、平均LOE、I、II和IV级发文量是IF和SJR增加的显著预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ten-Year Trends in Level of Evidence in Hand Surgery.

Background: The purposes of this study were to analyze the trends in Oxford level of evidence (LOE), LOE of most-cited articles, and association between LOE and journal impact factor (IF) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) over a 10-year period (2009-2018) in 3 prominent hand surgery journals, specifically HAND, Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) (JHS), and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (JHSE).

Methods: All articles published from 2009 to 2018 in HAND, JHS, and JHSE were reviewed for assigned or available LOE. Data were pooled and analyzed for trends in LOE; relationship among IF, SJR, and LOE; and citation density.

Results: A total of 3921 total publications were tabulated from 2009 to 2018, with the majority of studies being level V (1700, 43%) and fewer studies being level I (146, 4%). Over the 10-year study period, there was no significant change in frequency of level I studies for any journal. HAND trended significantly toward higher LOE, JHS trended toward higher LOE, and JHSE trended toward decreased LOE without significance. Among all journals, the annual number of articles and the average LOE were independent significant predictors of IF and SJR. Statistically significant correlations were found between citation density and LOE for JHS and HAND.

Conclusions: Higher quality evidence is becoming more prevalent in the hand surgery literature over the past 10 years. Annual articles, average LOE, and level I and II and level IV articles were significant predictors of increasing IF and SJR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Monteggia Fracture Outcomes: Acute to Chronic. Outcomes in Ballistic Injuries to the Hand: Fractures and Nerve/Tendon Damage as Predictors of Poor Outcomes. Predictors of Digital Amputation in Diabetic Patients With Surgically Treated Finger Infections. The Prevalence of Depression and PTSD in Adults With Surgically Managed Traumatic Upper-Extremity Amputations. Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1