含100% RAP和再生剂的泡沫沥青混合料的实验室评价

IF 1.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Australian Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2020-07-15 DOI:10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329
M. M. Jeong, Sungun Kim, Junan Shen
{"title":"含100% RAP和再生剂的泡沫沥青混合料的实验室评价","authors":"M. M. Jeong, Sungun Kim, Junan Shen","doi":"10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study, conducted in Georgia, analyzes the impact of rejuvenators on foamed asphalt mixtures containing 100% reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and assesses the feasibility of using the mixture as a structural layer in a pavement system. Three laboratory tests, the Marshall stability (MS), indirect tensile strength (ITS), and semi-circular bending (SCB), were conducted for the structural evaluation. Results indicate that the MS and ITS of the mixtures without rejuvenator are sufficiently high for use as a subsurface structural layer. However, dosing the mixture with ≥6% rejuvenator significantly decreases the MS and ITS. SCB tests for fracture resistance at an intermediate temperature indicate that mixtures without rejuvenators are more brittle than conventional hot mix asphalt (HMA). The flexibility index indicates that the mixtures with ≥6% rejuvenator have higher crack resistance than HMA and no-rejuvenator 100% RAP foamed asphalt mixtures. In conclusion, addition of rejuvenators significantly affects the structural integrity of 100% RAP foamed asphalt mixtures by increasing the cracking resistance but considerably decreasing the stability and indirect strength. Therefore, for practical purposes, the use of a rejuvenator in foamed asphalt mixtures is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":44354,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"46 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory evaluation of foamed asphalt mixtures with 100% RAP and rejuvenator\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Jeong, Sungun Kim, Junan Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study, conducted in Georgia, analyzes the impact of rejuvenators on foamed asphalt mixtures containing 100% reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and assesses the feasibility of using the mixture as a structural layer in a pavement system. Three laboratory tests, the Marshall stability (MS), indirect tensile strength (ITS), and semi-circular bending (SCB), were conducted for the structural evaluation. Results indicate that the MS and ITS of the mixtures without rejuvenator are sufficiently high for use as a subsurface structural layer. However, dosing the mixture with ≥6% rejuvenator significantly decreases the MS and ITS. SCB tests for fracture resistance at an intermediate temperature indicate that mixtures without rejuvenators are more brittle than conventional hot mix asphalt (HMA). The flexibility index indicates that the mixtures with ≥6% rejuvenator have higher crack resistance than HMA and no-rejuvenator 100% RAP foamed asphalt mixtures. In conclusion, addition of rejuvenators significantly affects the structural integrity of 100% RAP foamed asphalt mixtures by increasing the cracking resistance but considerably decreasing the stability and indirect strength. Therefore, for practical purposes, the use of a rejuvenator in foamed asphalt mixtures is not recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"46 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2020.1794329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究在乔治亚州进行,分析了再生剂对含有100%再生沥青路面(RAP)的泡沫沥青混合料的影响,并评估了将混合料用作路面系统结构层的可行性。进行了三个实验室试验,即马歇尔稳定性(MS)、间接抗拉强度(ITS)和半圆弯曲(SCB),用于结构评估。结果表明,没有再生剂的混合物的MS和ITS足够高,可以用作地下结构层。然而,用≥6%的再生剂给药混合物可显著降低MS和ITS。SCB在中等温度下的抗裂性测试表明,没有再生剂的混合物比传统的热拌沥青(HMA)更脆。柔性指数表明,添加≥6%再生剂的混合料比HMA和不添加再生剂的100%RAP发泡沥青混合料具有更高的抗裂性。总之,再生剂的加入显著影响100%RAP发泡沥青混合料的结构完整性,增加了抗裂性,但显著降低了稳定性和间接强度。因此,出于实际目的,不建议在泡沫沥青混合料中使用再生剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laboratory evaluation of foamed asphalt mixtures with 100% RAP and rejuvenator
ABSTRACT This study, conducted in Georgia, analyzes the impact of rejuvenators on foamed asphalt mixtures containing 100% reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and assesses the feasibility of using the mixture as a structural layer in a pavement system. Three laboratory tests, the Marshall stability (MS), indirect tensile strength (ITS), and semi-circular bending (SCB), were conducted for the structural evaluation. Results indicate that the MS and ITS of the mixtures without rejuvenator are sufficiently high for use as a subsurface structural layer. However, dosing the mixture with ≥6% rejuvenator significantly decreases the MS and ITS. SCB tests for fracture resistance at an intermediate temperature indicate that mixtures without rejuvenators are more brittle than conventional hot mix asphalt (HMA). The flexibility index indicates that the mixtures with ≥6% rejuvenator have higher crack resistance than HMA and no-rejuvenator 100% RAP foamed asphalt mixtures. In conclusion, addition of rejuvenators significantly affects the structural integrity of 100% RAP foamed asphalt mixtures by increasing the cracking resistance but considerably decreasing the stability and indirect strength. Therefore, for practical purposes, the use of a rejuvenator in foamed asphalt mixtures is not recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Socio-environmental management of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) through a socio-ecological system approach: governance, adaptation, and long-term stability A parametric design framework for timber framing span tables Dynamic analysis of RC frame structure subjected to various damage severity in beams and columns Evaluation of the field survey procedure and three-dimensional modelling of a building using drone-captured images The impact of seismic waves to evaluate the behaviour of a real case of damaged earth dam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1