多少工作量是人类在截止日期前完成的“好”工作量:人的能力区域和工作量平衡

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Design Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1080/09544828.2023.2249216
Mengting Zhao, D. Qiu, Yong Zeng
{"title":"多少工作量是人类在截止日期前完成的“好”工作量:人的能力区域和工作量平衡","authors":"Mengting Zhao, D. Qiu, Yong Zeng","doi":"10.1080/09544828.2023.2249216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When given a ‘good’ workload, human participants can efficiently complete the assigned task within the time limit, while they may fail to complete it due to low efficiency when given a ‘bad’ workload. The objective of this research is to investigate how much workload is considered ‘good’ for individuals to meet a deadline and successfully complete the assigned task. High work efficiency can be achieved by manipulating workload assignments and assigning them to different individuals at the appropriate time. We have defined the range of this ‘good’ workload as the capacity zone, which should be supported by necessary interventions from computers or human instructors. The capacity zone represents the area between the two workload equilibrium points, whose position and shape are influenced by factors such as mental capacity, maximum efficiency, and stress limit. Our analysis and simulation results indicate that humans are only capable of effectively completing a large amount of workload assignment by the deadline when working within their capacity zone. Therefore, this research aims to enhance overall work efficiency by customising workload allocation strategies based on different individuals' capacity zone and providing timely intervention when they are working beyond their capacity zone.","PeriodicalId":50207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design","volume":"34 1","pages":"644 - 673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How much workload is a ‘good’ workload for human beings to meet the deadline: human capacity zone and workload equilibrium\",\"authors\":\"Mengting Zhao, D. Qiu, Yong Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09544828.2023.2249216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When given a ‘good’ workload, human participants can efficiently complete the assigned task within the time limit, while they may fail to complete it due to low efficiency when given a ‘bad’ workload. The objective of this research is to investigate how much workload is considered ‘good’ for individuals to meet a deadline and successfully complete the assigned task. High work efficiency can be achieved by manipulating workload assignments and assigning them to different individuals at the appropriate time. We have defined the range of this ‘good’ workload as the capacity zone, which should be supported by necessary interventions from computers or human instructors. The capacity zone represents the area between the two workload equilibrium points, whose position and shape are influenced by factors such as mental capacity, maximum efficiency, and stress limit. Our analysis and simulation results indicate that humans are only capable of effectively completing a large amount of workload assignment by the deadline when working within their capacity zone. Therefore, this research aims to enhance overall work efficiency by customising workload allocation strategies based on different individuals' capacity zone and providing timely intervention when they are working beyond their capacity zone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Design\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"644 - 673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2249216\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2249216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当给出“好”的工作量时,人类参与者可以在时限内高效地完成分配的任务,而当给出“坏”的工作量后,他们可能会因为效率低而无法完成任务。这项研究的目的是调查有多少工作量被认为对个人在截止日期前成功完成指定任务是“好的”。通过操纵工作量分配并在适当的时间将其分配给不同的个人,可以实现高工作效率。我们已经将这种“良好”工作量的范围定义为能力区,这应该得到计算机或人工讲师的必要干预的支持。能力区代表两个工作量平衡点之间的区域,其位置和形状受心理能力、最大效率和压力极限等因素的影响。我们的分析和模拟结果表明,当人类在其能力范围内工作时,只有在截止日期前才能有效完成大量的工作量分配。因此,本研究旨在通过根据不同个人的能力区域定制工作量分配策略,并在他们超出能力区域工作时提供及时干预,来提高整体工作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How much workload is a ‘good’ workload for human beings to meet the deadline: human capacity zone and workload equilibrium
When given a ‘good’ workload, human participants can efficiently complete the assigned task within the time limit, while they may fail to complete it due to low efficiency when given a ‘bad’ workload. The objective of this research is to investigate how much workload is considered ‘good’ for individuals to meet a deadline and successfully complete the assigned task. High work efficiency can be achieved by manipulating workload assignments and assigning them to different individuals at the appropriate time. We have defined the range of this ‘good’ workload as the capacity zone, which should be supported by necessary interventions from computers or human instructors. The capacity zone represents the area between the two workload equilibrium points, whose position and shape are influenced by factors such as mental capacity, maximum efficiency, and stress limit. Our analysis and simulation results indicate that humans are only capable of effectively completing a large amount of workload assignment by the deadline when working within their capacity zone. Therefore, this research aims to enhance overall work efficiency by customising workload allocation strategies based on different individuals' capacity zone and providing timely intervention when they are working beyond their capacity zone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Design
Journal of Engineering Design 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Design is a leading international publication that provides an essential forum for dialogue on important issues across all disciplines and aspects of the design of engineered products and systems. The Journal publishes pioneering, contemporary, best industrial practice as well as authoritative research, studies and review papers on the underlying principles of design, its management, practice, techniques and methodologies, rather than specific domain applications. We welcome papers that examine the following topics: Engineering design aesthetics, style and form- Big data analytics in engineering design- Collaborative design in engineering- Engineering concept design- Creativity and innovation in engineering- Engineering design architectures- Design costing in engineering Design education and pedagogy in engineering- Engineering design for X, e.g. manufacturability, assembly, environment, sustainability- Engineering design management- Design risk and uncertainty in engineering- Engineering design theory and methodology- Designing product platforms, modularity and reuse in engineering- Emotive design, e.g. Kansei engineering- Ergonomics, styling and the design process- Evolutionary design activity in engineering (product improvement & refinement)- Global and distributed engineering design- Inclusive design and assistive engineering technology- Engineering industrial design and total design- Integrated engineering design development- Knowledge and information management in engineering- Engineering maintainability, sustainability, safety and standards- Multi, inter and trans disciplinary engineering design- New engineering product design and development- Engineering product introduction process[...]
期刊最新文献
Integrating GRA with intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR model to explore attractive design solution of wickerwork cultural and creative products Modularity and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and task uncertainty Reconciling platform vs. product optimisation by value-based margins on solutions and parameters Smart industrial information integration: a lightweight privacy protection model in an intelligent manufacturing architecture Lumos: AI-driven prompt optimisation tool for assisting conceptual design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1