体育、体育与新唯物主义

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Somatechnics Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.3366/soma.2021.0347
Joshua I. Newman, H. Thorpe
{"title":"体育、体育与新唯物主义","authors":"Joshua I. Newman, H. Thorpe","doi":"10.3366/soma.2021.0347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The physical, material body and its associations have taken primacy during these extraordinary times. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, legions of public health officials, pharma-entrepreneurs, and political intermediaries from around the world have fixed their complexes upon the living body and its varying scales of inter-relatedness. As the global pandemic has evolved, the body has been increasingly rendered visible, quantifiable, relational, traceable, transmissive, vulnerable, and abject. The pandemic body - rife with biological and onto-epistemological contingencies - has been thrust into a paradoxical state of fixity and uncertainty. It is the site of individuated fixation - made into object of (bio)political inquiry and control;at once a complex node of communitas and immunitas. It has been surveilled and technologized in increments of six-foot spacings, single-unit mask adornments, and 95% success rates. However, amidst such COVID-spawned 'body shocks', as Margrit Shildrick (2019) might suggest, the frames by which we as scientists and philosophers have come to know the body, and to embody that knowledge, have very much been unsettled (see Thorpe, Brice, & Clark 2021). The pandemic has forced us to rethink the relatedness of the body - to other bodies, to vulnerable bodies, to the population as a whole, to particulate matter, to the state and its medical-industrial-complexes. We have been forced to reimagine how bodies move, how movement is relative, how we breath, and where we can stand or walk or travel or live.","PeriodicalId":43420,"journal":{"name":"Somatechnics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sport, Physical Culture, and New Materialisms\",\"authors\":\"Joshua I. Newman, H. Thorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/soma.2021.0347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The physical, material body and its associations have taken primacy during these extraordinary times. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, legions of public health officials, pharma-entrepreneurs, and political intermediaries from around the world have fixed their complexes upon the living body and its varying scales of inter-relatedness. As the global pandemic has evolved, the body has been increasingly rendered visible, quantifiable, relational, traceable, transmissive, vulnerable, and abject. The pandemic body - rife with biological and onto-epistemological contingencies - has been thrust into a paradoxical state of fixity and uncertainty. It is the site of individuated fixation - made into object of (bio)political inquiry and control;at once a complex node of communitas and immunitas. It has been surveilled and technologized in increments of six-foot spacings, single-unit mask adornments, and 95% success rates. However, amidst such COVID-spawned 'body shocks', as Margrit Shildrick (2019) might suggest, the frames by which we as scientists and philosophers have come to know the body, and to embody that knowledge, have very much been unsettled (see Thorpe, Brice, & Clark 2021). The pandemic has forced us to rethink the relatedness of the body - to other bodies, to vulnerable bodies, to the population as a whole, to particulate matter, to the state and its medical-industrial-complexes. We have been forced to reimagine how bodies move, how movement is relative, how we breath, and where we can stand or walk or travel or live.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatechnics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2021.0347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2021.0347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

物质的身体和它的关联在这些非凡的时代占据了首要地位。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,来自世界各地的大批公共卫生官员、制药企业家和政治中介机构将他们的复合体固定在生命体及其不同规模的相互关联上。随着全球大流行的演变,该机构日益变得可见、可量化、相关、可追溯、具有传染性、脆弱和卑贱。流行病主体——充斥着生物学和本体认识论上的偶然性——被推入了一种固定和不确定的矛盾状态。它是个体化固定的场所——成为(生物)政治探究和控制的对象;同时也是社群和免疫的复杂节点。它已经被监控和技术以六英尺的间距递增,单个面罩装饰,成功率为95%。然而,正如玛格丽特·希尔德里克(Margrit Shildrick, 2019)可能指出的那样,在这种由新冠病毒引发的“身体冲击”中,我们作为科学家和哲学家认识身体并体现这种知识的框架在很大程度上是不稳定的(见Thorpe, Brice, & Clark, 2021)。这场大流行病迫使我们重新思考身体与其他身体、与脆弱身体、与整体人口、与微粒物质、与国家及其医疗工业联合体的关系。我们被迫重新想象身体是如何运动的,运动是如何相对的,我们如何呼吸,我们在哪里可以站立、行走、旅行或生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sport, Physical Culture, and New Materialisms
The physical, material body and its associations have taken primacy during these extraordinary times. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, legions of public health officials, pharma-entrepreneurs, and political intermediaries from around the world have fixed their complexes upon the living body and its varying scales of inter-relatedness. As the global pandemic has evolved, the body has been increasingly rendered visible, quantifiable, relational, traceable, transmissive, vulnerable, and abject. The pandemic body - rife with biological and onto-epistemological contingencies - has been thrust into a paradoxical state of fixity and uncertainty. It is the site of individuated fixation - made into object of (bio)political inquiry and control;at once a complex node of communitas and immunitas. It has been surveilled and technologized in increments of six-foot spacings, single-unit mask adornments, and 95% success rates. However, amidst such COVID-spawned 'body shocks', as Margrit Shildrick (2019) might suggest, the frames by which we as scientists and philosophers have come to know the body, and to embody that knowledge, have very much been unsettled (see Thorpe, Brice, & Clark 2021). The pandemic has forced us to rethink the relatedness of the body - to other bodies, to vulnerable bodies, to the population as a whole, to particulate matter, to the state and its medical-industrial-complexes. We have been forced to reimagine how bodies move, how movement is relative, how we breath, and where we can stand or walk or travel or live.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Somatechnics
Somatechnics SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Joshua St. Pierre, Cheap Talk: Disability and the Politics of Communication Critical Disability Studies, Corporeality and Child Maltreatment: Theorising the Somatechnics of Self and Other The Many Names and Shapes of Water: Emergent Narratives on a Non-existing Water Body in Latin America The Somatechnics of Water: Part 2 Permeable Housing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1