外语学生的词典编纂能力

Q3 Arts and Humanities Komunikacija i Kultura Online Pub Date : 2018-12-08 DOI:10.18485/KKONLINE.2018.9.9.15
Nenad Tomović, Sofija A. Bilandžija, Jelena Kostić-Tomović
{"title":"外语学生的词典编纂能力","authors":"Nenad Tomović, Sofija A. Bilandžija, Jelena Kostić-Tomović","doi":"10.18485/KKONLINE.2018.9.9.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it is often considered that successful use of a dictionary does not require any special knowledge or skills, research has shown that most users do not consult dictionaries efficiently or frequently enough. Users often avoid consulting dictionaries as much as they can, because they consider it to be a tedious and uninteresting task. Even when they consult a dictionary, most of them are not familiar with types of dictionaries, what type of dictionary would be the most useful one or how to assess the quality of a dictionary. A lot of information in a dictionary remains unnoticed and/or users fail to interpret it. These statements hold true for most users and for students of humanities or linguistics. Just like other users, students of linguistics fail to notice their own lack of user competence and are often unwilling to invest some time and effort to improve it. They may be willing to change this attitude only after being persuaded through a series of obvious examples that they fail to notice a lot of useful information that would allow them to avoid certain mistakes or to solve a problem. \nIn this paper the authors will analyze responses to a questionnaire completed by students of English, Scandinavian languages and German at the Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade, which show their attitude to using dictionaries, their habits and what they know about the dictionaries that are crucial for their studies and future careers. The authors will use this analysis to point to the necessary improvements in user competence these students are supposed to achieve and possible ways of achieving it.","PeriodicalId":37164,"journal":{"name":"Komunikacija i Kultura Online","volume":"9 1","pages":"277-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEXICOGRAPHIC COMPETENCE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDENTS\",\"authors\":\"Nenad Tomović, Sofija A. Bilandžija, Jelena Kostić-Tomović\",\"doi\":\"10.18485/KKONLINE.2018.9.9.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although it is often considered that successful use of a dictionary does not require any special knowledge or skills, research has shown that most users do not consult dictionaries efficiently or frequently enough. Users often avoid consulting dictionaries as much as they can, because they consider it to be a tedious and uninteresting task. Even when they consult a dictionary, most of them are not familiar with types of dictionaries, what type of dictionary would be the most useful one or how to assess the quality of a dictionary. A lot of information in a dictionary remains unnoticed and/or users fail to interpret it. These statements hold true for most users and for students of humanities or linguistics. Just like other users, students of linguistics fail to notice their own lack of user competence and are often unwilling to invest some time and effort to improve it. They may be willing to change this attitude only after being persuaded through a series of obvious examples that they fail to notice a lot of useful information that would allow them to avoid certain mistakes or to solve a problem. \\nIn this paper the authors will analyze responses to a questionnaire completed by students of English, Scandinavian languages and German at the Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade, which show their attitude to using dictionaries, their habits and what they know about the dictionaries that are crucial for their studies and future careers. The authors will use this analysis to point to the necessary improvements in user competence these students are supposed to achieve and possible ways of achieving it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Komunikacija i Kultura Online\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"277-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Komunikacija i Kultura Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18485/KKONLINE.2018.9.9.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Komunikacija i Kultura Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/KKONLINE.2018.9.9.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们通常认为成功地使用字典不需要任何特殊的知识或技能,但研究表明,大多数用户查阅字典的效率和频率都不够。用户通常会尽量避免查阅字典,因为他们认为这是一项乏味而无趣的任务。即使他们查字典,他们中的大多数人也不熟悉字典的类型,什么类型的字典最有用,或者如何评估字典的质量。字典中的许多信息都没有被注意到,或者用户无法解释它们。这些说法适用于大多数用户以及人文或语言学专业的学生。和其他用户一样,语言学专业的学生没有意识到自己的用户能力不足,也不愿意花时间和精力去提高自己的用户能力。他们可能只有在通过一系列明显的例子被说服后才愿意改变这种态度,因为他们没有注意到许多有用的信息,这些信息可以让他们避免某些错误或解决问题。在本文中,作者将分析对贝尔格莱德大学文学系英语,斯堪的纳维亚语言和德语学生完成的问卷调查的反应,这些问卷显示了他们对使用字典的态度,他们的习惯以及他们对字典的了解,这对他们的学习和未来的职业至关重要。作者将使用这种分析来指出这些学生应该实现的用户能力的必要改进以及实现它的可能方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LEXICOGRAPHIC COMPETENCE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDENTS
Although it is often considered that successful use of a dictionary does not require any special knowledge or skills, research has shown that most users do not consult dictionaries efficiently or frequently enough. Users often avoid consulting dictionaries as much as they can, because they consider it to be a tedious and uninteresting task. Even when they consult a dictionary, most of them are not familiar with types of dictionaries, what type of dictionary would be the most useful one or how to assess the quality of a dictionary. A lot of information in a dictionary remains unnoticed and/or users fail to interpret it. These statements hold true for most users and for students of humanities or linguistics. Just like other users, students of linguistics fail to notice their own lack of user competence and are often unwilling to invest some time and effort to improve it. They may be willing to change this attitude only after being persuaded through a series of obvious examples that they fail to notice a lot of useful information that would allow them to avoid certain mistakes or to solve a problem. In this paper the authors will analyze responses to a questionnaire completed by students of English, Scandinavian languages and German at the Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade, which show their attitude to using dictionaries, their habits and what they know about the dictionaries that are crucial for their studies and future careers. The authors will use this analysis to point to the necessary improvements in user competence these students are supposed to achieve and possible ways of achieving it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Komunikacija i Kultura Online
Komunikacija i Kultura Online Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Place of American English in European Education Virna Karlić i Petra Bago, (Računalna) pragmatika. Temeljni pojmovi i korpusnopragmatičke analize. Zagreb: Sveučilište u Zagrebu „Ff-Press”, 2021, 275 str. Mark Twain and the United Kingdom: A Peculiar Relationship? It’s Like Being Hit by a Tsunami: The use of the natural force Metaphor for Conceptualising the COVID-19 Pandemic in English and Serbian Online Mode of Autobiographical Reminiscing: Discourse Practices in Digital Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1