近断层土工合成筋桩支撑路堤的抗震性能

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1680/jgein.21.00105
W. Guo, X. Wang, C. He, L. Jiang, Y. Long, Z. Guo, Q. Yan, L. Zhao, Y. Lin
{"title":"近断层土工合成筋桩支撑路堤的抗震性能","authors":"W. Guo, X. Wang, C. He, L. Jiang, Y. Long, Z. Guo, Q. Yan, L. Zhao, Y. Lin","doi":"10.1680/jgein.21.00105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seismic performance of embankments is an important consideration for the design and construction of high-speed railways (HSRs) in near-fault areas. Incorporating geosynthetics into embankment soil can improve seismic resistance. However, the effect of different reinforcement methods on the seismic performance of embankments is not well understood. In this study, two 1:20 scaled embankment models (full-length-geosynthetics reinforced pile-supported embankment (FRPE) and turn-back-geosynthetics reinforced pile-supported embankment (TRPE)) were tested on a shaking table to compare their seismic performance and failure characteristics. The results show that, under near-fault bidirectional seismic excitation, the pile foundations of both embankments exhibited bending deformation, with the largest bending moment was the largest in the middle of the pile body. The TRPE reduced the vertical dynamic response of the embankment slope but exhibited a more remarkable horizontal dynamic response than the FRPE. Furthermore, the embankment deformation and excess pore water pressure of the TRPE were generally larger than those of the FRPE. Nonetheless, the TRPE has potential application in practical engineering as it ensures earthquake resistance, with higher economic benefits.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic performance of near-fault geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment\",\"authors\":\"W. Guo, X. Wang, C. He, L. Jiang, Y. Long, Z. Guo, Q. Yan, L. Zhao, Y. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgein.21.00105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The seismic performance of embankments is an important consideration for the design and construction of high-speed railways (HSRs) in near-fault areas. Incorporating geosynthetics into embankment soil can improve seismic resistance. However, the effect of different reinforcement methods on the seismic performance of embankments is not well understood. In this study, two 1:20 scaled embankment models (full-length-geosynthetics reinforced pile-supported embankment (FRPE) and turn-back-geosynthetics reinforced pile-supported embankment (TRPE)) were tested on a shaking table to compare their seismic performance and failure characteristics. The results show that, under near-fault bidirectional seismic excitation, the pile foundations of both embankments exhibited bending deformation, with the largest bending moment was the largest in the middle of the pile body. The TRPE reduced the vertical dynamic response of the embankment slope but exhibited a more remarkable horizontal dynamic response than the FRPE. Furthermore, the embankment deformation and excess pore water pressure of the TRPE were generally larger than those of the FRPE. Nonetheless, the TRPE has potential application in practical engineering as it ensures earthquake resistance, with higher economic benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosynthetics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

路堤的抗震性能是近断层地区高速铁路设计和施工的重要考虑因素。在路堤土壤中加入土工合成材料可以提高抗震性能。然而,不同加固方法对路堤抗震性能的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,在振动台上测试了两个1:20比例的路堤模型(全长土工合成材料加筋桩支撑路堤(FRPE)和折返土工合成纤维加筋桩支持路堤(TRPE)),以比较它们的抗震性能和破坏特征。研究结果表明,在近故障双向地震激励下,两个路堤的桩基均表现出弯曲变形,最大弯矩出现在桩身中部。TRPE降低了路堤边坡的垂直动力响应,但表现出比FRPE更显著的水平动力响应。此外,TRPE的路堤变形和超孔隙水压力通常大于FRPE。尽管如此,TRPE在实际工程中具有潜在的应用前景,因为它可以确保抗震性,并具有更高的经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seismic performance of near-fault geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment
The seismic performance of embankments is an important consideration for the design and construction of high-speed railways (HSRs) in near-fault areas. Incorporating geosynthetics into embankment soil can improve seismic resistance. However, the effect of different reinforcement methods on the seismic performance of embankments is not well understood. In this study, two 1:20 scaled embankment models (full-length-geosynthetics reinforced pile-supported embankment (FRPE) and turn-back-geosynthetics reinforced pile-supported embankment (TRPE)) were tested on a shaking table to compare their seismic performance and failure characteristics. The results show that, under near-fault bidirectional seismic excitation, the pile foundations of both embankments exhibited bending deformation, with the largest bending moment was the largest in the middle of the pile body. The TRPE reduced the vertical dynamic response of the embankment slope but exhibited a more remarkable horizontal dynamic response than the FRPE. Furthermore, the embankment deformation and excess pore water pressure of the TRPE were generally larger than those of the FRPE. Nonetheless, the TRPE has potential application in practical engineering as it ensures earthquake resistance, with higher economic benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Na-CMC-amended clay: effect of mixing method on hydraulic conductivity and polymer elution A nonlinear analytical model for consolidated geotextile-encased sand columns Geotextile filters: from idealization to real behaviour (Giroud Lecture 2023) Mechanical characteristics of geogrids produced from recycled polyester Natural weathering effects of nonwoven geotextile exposed to different climate conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1