教学重点和任务类型对职前学习者英语口语互动能力的影响

IF 2.1 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium) Pub Date : 2019-06-25 DOI:10.1075/ITL.18027.VAN
Eline van Batenburg, R. Oostdam, Amos J. S. van Gelderen, R. Fukkink, Nivja H. de Jong
{"title":"教学重点和任务类型对职前学习者英语口语互动能力的影响","authors":"Eline van Batenburg, R. Oostdam, Amos J. S. van Gelderen, R. Fukkink, Nivja H. de Jong","doi":"10.1075/ITL.18027.VAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nLittle is known about the effect of diverging pedagogies on the development of interactional oral skills in a foreign language. In a controlled study, we evaluated three newly developed instructional programmes that were situated in the same training context, but that differed in instructional focus and type of task. These were compared to the effects of business-as-usual instruction. Multilevel analysis revealed that all experimental groups outperformed the ‘business-as-usual’ control group on oral interaction skills (N = 199), with similar results for the programmes. Positive effects were found on interaction skills for trained contexts of use only. No transfer was found to tasks in other contexts of use. We conclude that receiving contextualised oral interaction instruction is beneficial to the development of pre-vocational learners’ interaction skills.","PeriodicalId":53175,"journal":{"name":"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of instructional focus and task type on pre-vocational learners’ ability in EFL oral interaction\",\"authors\":\"Eline van Batenburg, R. Oostdam, Amos J. S. van Gelderen, R. Fukkink, Nivja H. de Jong\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ITL.18027.VAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nLittle is known about the effect of diverging pedagogies on the development of interactional oral skills in a foreign language. In a controlled study, we evaluated three newly developed instructional programmes that were situated in the same training context, but that differed in instructional focus and type of task. These were compared to the effects of business-as-usual instruction. Multilevel analysis revealed that all experimental groups outperformed the ‘business-as-usual’ control group on oral interaction skills (N = 199), with similar results for the programmes. Positive effects were found on interaction skills for trained contexts of use only. No transfer was found to tasks in other contexts of use. We conclude that receiving contextualised oral interaction instruction is beneficial to the development of pre-vocational learners’ interaction skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ITL.18027.VAN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ITL.18027.VAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于不同的教学方法对外语口语互动技能发展的影响,我们知之甚少。在一项对照研究中,我们评估了三个新开发的教学计划,它们位于相同的培训环境中,但在教学重点和任务类型上有所不同。这些结果与“一切照旧”教学的效果进行了比较。多层次分析显示,所有实验组在口头交流技能上的表现都优于“一切照旧”的对照组(N = 199),各项目的结果也相似。仅在经过训练的使用情境中,对互动技能发现了积极的影响。没有发现转移到其他使用上下文中的任务。我们得出结论,接受情境化的口语互动教学有利于职业前学习者互动技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of instructional focus and task type on pre-vocational learners’ ability in EFL oral interaction
Little is known about the effect of diverging pedagogies on the development of interactional oral skills in a foreign language. In a controlled study, we evaluated three newly developed instructional programmes that were situated in the same training context, but that differed in instructional focus and type of task. These were compared to the effects of business-as-usual instruction. Multilevel analysis revealed that all experimental groups outperformed the ‘business-as-usual’ control group on oral interaction skills (N = 199), with similar results for the programmes. Positive effects were found on interaction skills for trained contexts of use only. No transfer was found to tasks in other contexts of use. We conclude that receiving contextualised oral interaction instruction is beneficial to the development of pre-vocational learners’ interaction skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium) Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Review of Mohamed (2022): Reading the Arab World: A Content-Based Textbook for Intermediate to Advanced Learners of Arabic Review of Karlsson (2023): Advanced Students’ Knowledge of Vocabulary in a First and Second Language Review of Lightfoot (2020): Born to Parse: How Children Select Their Languages Preface Extensive viewing and L2 vocabulary learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1