临床监督技术应用中的伦理问题

Q4 Psychology Psihoterapija Pub Date : 2019-02-05 DOI:10.24869/psihei.2018.233
Katja Belsak, A. Simonič
{"title":"临床监督技术应用中的伦理问题","authors":"Katja Belsak, A. Simonič","doi":"10.24869/psihei.2018.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores ethical issues raised by the use of technology in clinical work with clients and in the supervision of supervisees’ work with clients. In the first part, the new technologies are presented, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of their use in supervision. The literature reveals three fields in which ethical issues are raised: supervision process, legal and regulatory issues and technology. In more detail, major emphasis has been put on the supervisory working relationship and questions of process, informed consent (between a supervisor and a supervisee and between a supervisee and a client), evaluation of a supervisees’ efficacy and confidentiality.","PeriodicalId":34980,"journal":{"name":"Psihoterapija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN CLINICAL SUPERVISION\",\"authors\":\"Katja Belsak, A. Simonič\",\"doi\":\"10.24869/psihei.2018.233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article explores ethical issues raised by the use of technology in clinical work with clients and in the supervision of supervisees’ work with clients. In the first part, the new technologies are presented, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of their use in supervision. The literature reveals three fields in which ethical issues are raised: supervision process, legal and regulatory issues and technology. In more detail, major emphasis has been put on the supervisory working relationship and questions of process, informed consent (between a supervisor and a supervisee and between a supervisee and a client), evaluation of a supervisees’ efficacy and confidentiality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihoterapija\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihoterapija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24869/psihei.2018.233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihoterapija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24869/psihei.2018.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨了在与客户的临床工作和监督被监督人与客户的工作中使用技术所引发的伦理问题。在第一部分中,介绍了新技术,以及它们在监督中使用的优点和缺点。文献揭示了提出伦理问题的三个领域:监督过程、法律和监管问题以及技术。更详细地说,重点是监督工作关系和程序、知情同意(监督人和被监督人之间以及被监督人和客户之间)、被监督人效力评估和保密问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN CLINICAL SUPERVISION
The article explores ethical issues raised by the use of technology in clinical work with clients and in the supervision of supervisees’ work with clients. In the first part, the new technologies are presented, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of their use in supervision. The literature reveals three fields in which ethical issues are raised: supervision process, legal and regulatory issues and technology. In more detail, major emphasis has been put on the supervisory working relationship and questions of process, informed consent (between a supervisor and a supervisee and between a supervisee and a client), evaluation of a supervisees’ efficacy and confidentiality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psihoterapija
Psihoterapija Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROBLEM STVARANJA GRUPE KAO CJELINE U GRUPI KOJA SE ODVIJA U PSIHIJATRIJSKOJ INSTITUCIJI STAVOVI LIJEČNIKA OBITELJSKE MEDICINE PRIMORSKOGORANSKE ŽUPANIJE PREMA PSIHOLOŠKIM METODAMA U LIJEČENJU SOMATSKIH BOLESTI MKB-11 KLASIFIKACIJA DUŠEVNIH POREMEĆAJA – IZAZOV ZA INTEGRACIJU PSIHODINAMIČKOG PRISTUPA GRUPA NAKON ISKLJUČENJA SUICIDALNOG ČLANA ILI ŠTO JE SKRIVENO U TEPIHU ZLOČINAC ILI ZAŠTITNIK ILI PRORADA KROZ SNOVE U GRUPNOANALITIČKOJ PSIHOTERAPIJI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1