中风患者在地上行走时膝麻痹的生物力学:系统综述

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2022.2090088
C. Waller, B. Sangelaji, Claire Hargest, S. Woodley, P. Lamb, S. Kuys, Allyson Calder, L. Hale
{"title":"中风患者在地上行走时膝麻痹的生物力学:系统综述","authors":"C. Waller, B. Sangelaji, Claire Hargest, S. Woodley, P. Lamb, S. Kuys, Allyson Calder, L. Hale","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2022.2090088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Biomechanics of the paretic knee during gait are well documented, yet these data have yet to be systematically summarised and analysed. Objective To analyse three-dimensional optic-based biomechanical data of the paretic knee post-stroke, compared to non-paretic or control participants’ knees, during overground gait. Methods Database searches were completed, with observational studies and baseline data from randomised controlled trials considered. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and determined risk of bias using the Downs and Black Quality Index. Quantitative and descriptive analyses were undertaken, with level of evidence considered. Results 31 studies were included, with 719 participants with stroke and 274 controls. Pooled data were heterogenous. Descriptive analyses demonstrated: reduced peak knee flexion at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic knee; reduced knee flexion during swing at the paretic knee compared to control knee; reduced sagittal range of motion at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic, and control knee; and reduced peak (internal) extension moments at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic knee. Most studies were at high risk of bias, demonstrating limited quality evidence in the current evidence base. Conclusion The paretic knee demonstrated reduced peak knee flexion, knee flexion during swing, range of motion, and knee extension moments compared to the non-paretic and/or control knee. Considerable heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. The current evidence base reflects limited quality, with further research required to better explore biomechanical differences occurring in well documented post-stroke gait patterns.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanics of the paretic knee during overground gait in people with stroke: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"C. Waller, B. Sangelaji, Claire Hargest, S. Woodley, P. Lamb, S. Kuys, Allyson Calder, L. Hale\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10833196.2022.2090088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Biomechanics of the paretic knee during gait are well documented, yet these data have yet to be systematically summarised and analysed. Objective To analyse three-dimensional optic-based biomechanical data of the paretic knee post-stroke, compared to non-paretic or control participants’ knees, during overground gait. Methods Database searches were completed, with observational studies and baseline data from randomised controlled trials considered. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and determined risk of bias using the Downs and Black Quality Index. Quantitative and descriptive analyses were undertaken, with level of evidence considered. Results 31 studies were included, with 719 participants with stroke and 274 controls. Pooled data were heterogenous. Descriptive analyses demonstrated: reduced peak knee flexion at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic knee; reduced knee flexion during swing at the paretic knee compared to control knee; reduced sagittal range of motion at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic, and control knee; and reduced peak (internal) extension moments at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic knee. Most studies were at high risk of bias, demonstrating limited quality evidence in the current evidence base. Conclusion The paretic knee demonstrated reduced peak knee flexion, knee flexion during swing, range of motion, and knee extension moments compared to the non-paretic and/or control knee. Considerable heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. The current evidence base reflects limited quality, with further research required to better explore biomechanical differences occurring in well documented post-stroke gait patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2090088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2090088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要背景步态中偏瘫膝关节的生物力学有很好的记录,但这些数据尚未得到系统的总结和分析。目的分析卒中后偏瘫膝关节在地上步态中与非偏瘫或对照组膝关节的三维光学生物力学数据。方法完成数据库搜索,考虑观察性研究和随机对照试验的基线数据。两名评审员独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用Downs和Black质量指数确定偏倚风险。进行了定量和描述性分析,并考虑了证据水平。结果纳入了31项研究,其中719名参与者患有中风,274名为对照组。汇集的数据是异构的。描述性分析表明:与非偏瘫膝关节相比,瘫痪膝关节的峰值屈曲减少;与对照膝关节相比,在偏瘫膝关节处摆动期间膝关节屈曲减少;与非偏瘫和对照膝相比,偏瘫膝的矢状运动范围减小;与非瘫痪性膝盖相比,瘫痪性膝盖的峰值(内部)伸展力矩减少。大多数研究都有很高的偏倚风险,表明在目前的证据基础上,证据质量有限。结论与非偏瘫和/或对照膝相比,偏瘫膝关节的峰值屈曲、摆动时的屈曲、活动范围和伸膝力矩降低。相当大的异质性阻碍了荟萃分析。目前的证据基础反映了有限的质量,需要进一步的研究来更好地探索中风后步态模式中出现的生物力学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biomechanics of the paretic knee during overground gait in people with stroke: a systematic review
Abstract Background Biomechanics of the paretic knee during gait are well documented, yet these data have yet to be systematically summarised and analysed. Objective To analyse three-dimensional optic-based biomechanical data of the paretic knee post-stroke, compared to non-paretic or control participants’ knees, during overground gait. Methods Database searches were completed, with observational studies and baseline data from randomised controlled trials considered. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and determined risk of bias using the Downs and Black Quality Index. Quantitative and descriptive analyses were undertaken, with level of evidence considered. Results 31 studies were included, with 719 participants with stroke and 274 controls. Pooled data were heterogenous. Descriptive analyses demonstrated: reduced peak knee flexion at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic knee; reduced knee flexion during swing at the paretic knee compared to control knee; reduced sagittal range of motion at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic, and control knee; and reduced peak (internal) extension moments at the paretic knee compared to non-paretic knee. Most studies were at high risk of bias, demonstrating limited quality evidence in the current evidence base. Conclusion The paretic knee demonstrated reduced peak knee flexion, knee flexion during swing, range of motion, and knee extension moments compared to the non-paretic and/or control knee. Considerable heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. The current evidence base reflects limited quality, with further research required to better explore biomechanical differences occurring in well documented post-stroke gait patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1