种族平等与缓刑——从前线的视角

IF 1.5 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY PROBATION JOURNAL Pub Date : 2022-05-02 DOI:10.1177/02645505221097517
N. Carr
{"title":"种族平等与缓刑——从前线的视角","authors":"N. Carr","doi":"10.1177/02645505221097517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of the journal includes an important piece by Mariam Rashid, a practitioner working in England. Mariam’s practice note reflects on what she describes as ‘complex complicity’ as a woman of colour working in a criminal justice system that disproportionately processes people from racial and ethnic minorities. Evidence of this disproportionality has been set out in a range of research and reports over many years, including most prominently in the Lammy Report published in 2017 which documented differential treatment and outcomes for Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic individuals at all stages of the criminal justice system (Lammy, 2017). The Lammy Report outlined that people from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic backgrounds are disproportionately targeted by police Stop and Search practices and are over-represented at all stages of the system and especially in the youth justice system and prison population. The data cited in the Lammy Report is from 2015/16, but a look at the most recent statistics shows that depressingly the dial has not shifted on this issue, despite a series of recommendations aimed at addressing the causes of disproportionality. In 2020 Black people comprised 3% of the population in England and Wales, but constituted 18% of all Stop and Searches, and 13% of the prison population (Ministry of Justice, 2021). In the interim of course, we have also seen the publication of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities Report (2021), which was widely criticized from a range of quarters for diluting the concept of ‘institutional racism’ and downplaying the structural factors impacting on people from racial and ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom (Runnymede Trust, 2021;Walker and Parveen, 2021). This has raised questions about this government’s commitment to meaningfully addressing the impacts of racial and ethnic disparities in all areas of society, including in the criminal justice system. In 2021 we also saw the publication of the Probation Inspectorate’s Thematic Review of Race Equality in probation (HMIP, 2021). Importantly this review looked at the experiences of both probation service users and staff. Several issues of concern are documented including gaps in service provision and a decline in probation services’ focus on racial equality following the implementation of Transforming Rehabilitation reforms. The thematic review also noted black, Asian and minority ethnic staff concerns’ regarding transparency of recruitment and selection practices and a lack of confidence in raising issues of racial discrimination. Editorial The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice","PeriodicalId":45814,"journal":{"name":"PROBATION JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race equality and probation – a view from the frontline\",\"authors\":\"N. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02645505221097517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This issue of the journal includes an important piece by Mariam Rashid, a practitioner working in England. Mariam’s practice note reflects on what she describes as ‘complex complicity’ as a woman of colour working in a criminal justice system that disproportionately processes people from racial and ethnic minorities. Evidence of this disproportionality has been set out in a range of research and reports over many years, including most prominently in the Lammy Report published in 2017 which documented differential treatment and outcomes for Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic individuals at all stages of the criminal justice system (Lammy, 2017). The Lammy Report outlined that people from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic backgrounds are disproportionately targeted by police Stop and Search practices and are over-represented at all stages of the system and especially in the youth justice system and prison population. The data cited in the Lammy Report is from 2015/16, but a look at the most recent statistics shows that depressingly the dial has not shifted on this issue, despite a series of recommendations aimed at addressing the causes of disproportionality. In 2020 Black people comprised 3% of the population in England and Wales, but constituted 18% of all Stop and Searches, and 13% of the prison population (Ministry of Justice, 2021). In the interim of course, we have also seen the publication of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities Report (2021), which was widely criticized from a range of quarters for diluting the concept of ‘institutional racism’ and downplaying the structural factors impacting on people from racial and ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom (Runnymede Trust, 2021;Walker and Parveen, 2021). This has raised questions about this government’s commitment to meaningfully addressing the impacts of racial and ethnic disparities in all areas of society, including in the criminal justice system. In 2021 we also saw the publication of the Probation Inspectorate’s Thematic Review of Race Equality in probation (HMIP, 2021). Importantly this review looked at the experiences of both probation service users and staff. Several issues of concern are documented including gaps in service provision and a decline in probation services’ focus on racial equality following the implementation of Transforming Rehabilitation reforms. The thematic review also noted black, Asian and minority ethnic staff concerns’ regarding transparency of recruitment and selection practices and a lack of confidence in raising issues of racial discrimination. Editorial The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice\",\"PeriodicalId\":45814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROBATION JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROBATION JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505221097517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROBATION JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505221097517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这期杂志包括玛丽亚姆·拉希德(Mariam Rashid)的一篇重要文章,她是一位在英国工作的从业者。玛丽安的练习笔记反映了她所描述的“复杂的共谋”,作为一名有色人种女性,她在刑事司法系统中工作,该系统不成比例地处理来自种族和少数民族的人。多年来,一系列研究和报告都提出了这种不均衡的证据,其中最突出的是2017年发表的拉米报告(Lammy Report),该报告记录了黑人、亚洲人和少数民族在刑事司法系统各个阶段的差别待遇和结果(Lammy, 2017)。拉米报告概述了黑人、亚裔和少数族裔背景的人不成比例地成为警察拦截和搜查的目标,并且在系统的各个阶段,特别是在青少年司法系统和监狱人口中都有过多的代表。拉米报告中引用的数据来自2015/16年,但看看最近的统计数据,令人沮丧的是,尽管有一系列旨在解决性别比例失调原因的建议,但在这个问题上的情况并没有改变。2020年,黑人占英格兰和威尔士人口的3%,但占所有拦截和搜查的18%,占监狱人口的13%(司法部,2021年)。当然,在此期间,我们也看到了《种族和民族差异委员会报告》(2021)的出版,该报告因淡化“制度性种族主义”的概念和淡化影响英国少数种族和少数民族的结构性因素而受到广泛批评(Runnymede Trust, 2021;Walker and Parveen, 2021)。这引发了人们对本届政府在社会各个领域(包括刑事司法系统)有意义地解决种族和民族差异影响的承诺的质疑。2021年,我们还看到了缓刑监察局关于缓刑中种族平等的专题审查(HMIP, 2021)的出版。重要的是,这项审查调查了缓刑服务使用者和工作人员的经历。记录了几个令人关切的问题,包括服务提供方面的差距,以及在实施改造康复改革后,缓刑服务对种族平等的关注有所下降。专题审查还注意到黑人、亚洲人和少数族裔工作人员对征聘和选择做法的透明度以及对提出种族歧视问题缺乏信心的关切。社论《社区与刑事司法杂志》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Race equality and probation – a view from the frontline
This issue of the journal includes an important piece by Mariam Rashid, a practitioner working in England. Mariam’s practice note reflects on what she describes as ‘complex complicity’ as a woman of colour working in a criminal justice system that disproportionately processes people from racial and ethnic minorities. Evidence of this disproportionality has been set out in a range of research and reports over many years, including most prominently in the Lammy Report published in 2017 which documented differential treatment and outcomes for Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic individuals at all stages of the criminal justice system (Lammy, 2017). The Lammy Report outlined that people from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic backgrounds are disproportionately targeted by police Stop and Search practices and are over-represented at all stages of the system and especially in the youth justice system and prison population. The data cited in the Lammy Report is from 2015/16, but a look at the most recent statistics shows that depressingly the dial has not shifted on this issue, despite a series of recommendations aimed at addressing the causes of disproportionality. In 2020 Black people comprised 3% of the population in England and Wales, but constituted 18% of all Stop and Searches, and 13% of the prison population (Ministry of Justice, 2021). In the interim of course, we have also seen the publication of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities Report (2021), which was widely criticized from a range of quarters for diluting the concept of ‘institutional racism’ and downplaying the structural factors impacting on people from racial and ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom (Runnymede Trust, 2021;Walker and Parveen, 2021). This has raised questions about this government’s commitment to meaningfully addressing the impacts of racial and ethnic disparities in all areas of society, including in the criminal justice system. In 2021 we also saw the publication of the Probation Inspectorate’s Thematic Review of Race Equality in probation (HMIP, 2021). Importantly this review looked at the experiences of both probation service users and staff. Several issues of concern are documented including gaps in service provision and a decline in probation services’ focus on racial equality following the implementation of Transforming Rehabilitation reforms. The thematic review also noted black, Asian and minority ethnic staff concerns’ regarding transparency of recruitment and selection practices and a lack of confidence in raising issues of racial discrimination. Editorial The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PROBATION JOURNAL
PROBATION JOURNAL CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
26.70%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Revise and reset A ‘weight’ on the shoulders of our youth: The pains of probation on young adult men with a sexual conviction. An exploratory study Double jeopardy for families of prisoners in Kashmir: A focus on prison visiting experiences People on probation as an inclusion health group: Exploring needs, barriers and service provision in Wales Probation as social work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1