澄清保健工作的快乐和意义的概念

A. Lai, Bram P. I. Fleuren
{"title":"澄清保健工作的快乐和意义的概念","authors":"A. Lai, Bram P. I. Fleuren","doi":"10.21037/JHMHP-21-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy. All rights reserved. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-22 The wellbeing of health care workers is a prime concern in the functioning and performance of health care organizations. While the Triple Aim—enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing health care costs—has contributed to health system reforms worldwide, scholars have asserted the need for a fourth aim to improve the professional lives of health care workers (1). Such improvements promote work engagement, job satisfaction, and talent retention; protect against the increasingly prevalent phenomenon of burnout among clinicians; and are essential for the quality and safety of care (2). They prompt health care leaders and managers to pay more attention to issues such as physicians’ experiences of autonomy loss and stress related to malpractice liability, as well as nurses’ experiences of disrespectful behaviors at work for example. More specifically, the Quadruple Aim is a call to help health care workers restore and maintain “joy and meaning in work” (3). Similarly, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement has promoted joy in work as a goal for organizations to work towards (4). The concepts of joy and meaning can however be elusive when health care leaders and managers seek to implement and evaluate workplace interventions to increase workplace wellbeing. This is because both concepts are used and defined in everyday discourse in a myriad of ways, including as a state of being, as a process of self-transcendence, or in relation to spiritual beliefs (5). Not only do these definitions preclude a consistency in which health care leaders and managers approach joy and meaning at work, there is also a wide array of conceptual definitions for and instruments to measure joy and meaning in the scientific literature (6). To make the concepts of joy and meaning in work more relevant to the health care context, we highlight some key insights from psychological research via a concept analysis in this paper. We first discuss the definitions of both concepts and how they relate to wellbeing at work more broadly. We then distinguish the nuances between (I) joy and meaning in and at work, and (II) meaning and meaningfulness. Finally, we discuss how health care workers can achieve meaningfulness through having an impact on others, workplace relationships, and professional development. By elaborating these concepts as well as their antecedents, we aim to highlight some dimensions that health care leaders and managers should consider when improving the wellbeing of health care workers.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clarifying the concepts of joy and meaning for work in health care\",\"authors\":\"A. Lai, Bram P. I. Fleuren\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/JHMHP-21-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"© Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy. All rights reserved. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-22 The wellbeing of health care workers is a prime concern in the functioning and performance of health care organizations. While the Triple Aim—enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing health care costs—has contributed to health system reforms worldwide, scholars have asserted the need for a fourth aim to improve the professional lives of health care workers (1). Such improvements promote work engagement, job satisfaction, and talent retention; protect against the increasingly prevalent phenomenon of burnout among clinicians; and are essential for the quality and safety of care (2). They prompt health care leaders and managers to pay more attention to issues such as physicians’ experiences of autonomy loss and stress related to malpractice liability, as well as nurses’ experiences of disrespectful behaviors at work for example. More specifically, the Quadruple Aim is a call to help health care workers restore and maintain “joy and meaning in work” (3). Similarly, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement has promoted joy in work as a goal for organizations to work towards (4). The concepts of joy and meaning can however be elusive when health care leaders and managers seek to implement and evaluate workplace interventions to increase workplace wellbeing. This is because both concepts are used and defined in everyday discourse in a myriad of ways, including as a state of being, as a process of self-transcendence, or in relation to spiritual beliefs (5). Not only do these definitions preclude a consistency in which health care leaders and managers approach joy and meaning at work, there is also a wide array of conceptual definitions for and instruments to measure joy and meaning in the scientific literature (6). To make the concepts of joy and meaning in work more relevant to the health care context, we highlight some key insights from psychological research via a concept analysis in this paper. We first discuss the definitions of both concepts and how they relate to wellbeing at work more broadly. We then distinguish the nuances between (I) joy and meaning in and at work, and (II) meaning and meaningfulness. Finally, we discuss how health care workers can achieve meaningfulness through having an impact on others, workplace relationships, and professional development. By elaborating these concepts as well as their antecedents, we aim to highlight some dimensions that health care leaders and managers should consider when improving the wellbeing of health care workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-21-22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-21-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

©医院管理与卫生政策杂志。版权所有。J医院管理卫生政策2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-22卫生保健工作者的福祉是卫生保健组织运作和绩效的主要关注点。虽然“三重目标”——提高患者体验、改善人口健康和降低医疗成本——促进了世界范围内的医疗体系改革,但学者们主张需要第四个目标来改善医疗工作者的职业生活(1)。这种改善促进了工作投入、工作满意度和人才保留;防止临床医生中日益普遍的职业倦怠现象;并且对护理的质量和安全至关重要(2)。它们促使医疗保健领导者和管理者更多地关注诸如医生经历的自主性丧失和与医疗事故责任相关的压力,以及护士在工作中经历的不尊重行为等问题。更具体地说,“四重目标”是一种帮助医护人员恢复和保持“工作中的快乐和意义”的呼吁(3)。同样,医疗保健改善研究所也将工作中的快乐作为组织努力实现的目标(4)。然而,当医疗保健领导者和管理者寻求实施和评估工作场所干预措施以增加工作场所幸福感时,快乐和意义的概念可能是难以捉摸的。这是因为这两个概念在日常话语中以无数种方式被使用和定义,包括作为一种存在状态,作为一种自我超越的过程,或与精神信仰有关(5)。这些定义不仅排除了医疗保健领导者和管理者在工作中获得快乐和意义的一致性,在科学文献中,也有一系列广泛的概念定义和测量快乐和意义的工具(6)。为了使工作中的快乐和意义的概念与卫生保健背景更加相关,我们在本文中通过概念分析强调了心理学研究中的一些关键见解。我们首先讨论这两个概念的定义,以及它们如何与更广泛的工作幸福感联系起来。然后我们区分(1)工作中的快乐和意义,(2)意义和有意义。最后,我们讨论了医护人员如何通过对他人、职场关系和专业发展的影响来实现有意义。通过详细阐述这些概念以及它们的前身,我们的目标是强调医疗保健领导者和管理人员在改善医疗保健工作者的福祉时应该考虑的一些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clarifying the concepts of joy and meaning for work in health care
© Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy. All rights reserved. J Hosp Manag Health Policy 2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-22 The wellbeing of health care workers is a prime concern in the functioning and performance of health care organizations. While the Triple Aim—enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing health care costs—has contributed to health system reforms worldwide, scholars have asserted the need for a fourth aim to improve the professional lives of health care workers (1). Such improvements promote work engagement, job satisfaction, and talent retention; protect against the increasingly prevalent phenomenon of burnout among clinicians; and are essential for the quality and safety of care (2). They prompt health care leaders and managers to pay more attention to issues such as physicians’ experiences of autonomy loss and stress related to malpractice liability, as well as nurses’ experiences of disrespectful behaviors at work for example. More specifically, the Quadruple Aim is a call to help health care workers restore and maintain “joy and meaning in work” (3). Similarly, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement has promoted joy in work as a goal for organizations to work towards (4). The concepts of joy and meaning can however be elusive when health care leaders and managers seek to implement and evaluate workplace interventions to increase workplace wellbeing. This is because both concepts are used and defined in everyday discourse in a myriad of ways, including as a state of being, as a process of self-transcendence, or in relation to spiritual beliefs (5). Not only do these definitions preclude a consistency in which health care leaders and managers approach joy and meaning at work, there is also a wide array of conceptual definitions for and instruments to measure joy and meaning in the scientific literature (6). To make the concepts of joy and meaning in work more relevant to the health care context, we highlight some key insights from psychological research via a concept analysis in this paper. We first discuss the definitions of both concepts and how they relate to wellbeing at work more broadly. We then distinguish the nuances between (I) joy and meaning in and at work, and (II) meaning and meaningfulness. Finally, we discuss how health care workers can achieve meaningfulness through having an impact on others, workplace relationships, and professional development. By elaborating these concepts as well as their antecedents, we aim to highlight some dimensions that health care leaders and managers should consider when improving the wellbeing of health care workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1