不确定性越大,波动性越大

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2019-11-29 DOI:10.3905/jii.2019.1.077
Inna Zorina, Jamie Khatri, Carol Zhu, James J. Rowley
{"title":"不确定性越大,波动性越大","authors":"Inna Zorina, Jamie Khatri, Carol Zhu, James J. Rowley","doi":"10.3905/jii.2019.1.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some academics and market participants argue that the growth of indexing causes market volatility. However, while the percentage of assets in indexed strategies has grown over the past twenty-five years, market volatility has risen and fallen in a somewhat random pattern, peaking around economic and financial crises. In this article, we test two measures of market volatility for their potential relationship with growth in indexing assets and selected macroeconomic factors. Our analysis demonstrates that macroeconomic factors have a strong correlation with and are useful predictors of market volatility; on the other hand, growth in indexing assets does not exhibit any causal relationship with market volatility. TOPIC: Volatility measures Key Findings • Macroeconomic factors and market volatility have a strong positive correlation while correlation between market volatility and growth of indexing is negative and relatively small in absolute terms. • Granger causality tests suggest that macroeconomic factors do have a causal relationship with and are useful predictors of market volatility. Growth of indexing, however, does not have such a relationship and is not a useful predictor of market volatility. • Macroeconomic factors such as economic policy uncertainty—not the growth of indexing assets—are responsible for elevated market volatility.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"With Greater Uncertainty Comes Greater Volatility\",\"authors\":\"Inna Zorina, Jamie Khatri, Carol Zhu, James J. Rowley\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jii.2019.1.077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some academics and market participants argue that the growth of indexing causes market volatility. However, while the percentage of assets in indexed strategies has grown over the past twenty-five years, market volatility has risen and fallen in a somewhat random pattern, peaking around economic and financial crises. In this article, we test two measures of market volatility for their potential relationship with growth in indexing assets and selected macroeconomic factors. Our analysis demonstrates that macroeconomic factors have a strong correlation with and are useful predictors of market volatility; on the other hand, growth in indexing assets does not exhibit any causal relationship with market volatility. TOPIC: Volatility measures Key Findings • Macroeconomic factors and market volatility have a strong positive correlation while correlation between market volatility and growth of indexing is negative and relatively small in absolute terms. • Granger causality tests suggest that macroeconomic factors do have a causal relationship with and are useful predictors of market volatility. Growth of indexing, however, does not have such a relationship and is not a useful predictor of market volatility. • Macroeconomic factors such as economic policy uncertainty—not the growth of indexing assets—are responsible for elevated market volatility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.1.077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.1.077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些学者和市场参与者辩称,指数化指数的增长导致了市场波动。然而,尽管指数化策略的资产比例在过去25年里有所增长,但市场波动性的上升和下降在某种程度上是随机的,在经济和金融危机期间达到顶峰。在本文中,我们测试了市场波动的两种衡量标准,以确定它们与指数资产增长和选定的宏观经济因素之间的潜在关系。我们的分析表明,宏观经济因素与市场波动有很强的相关性,并且是有用的预测因素;另一方面,指数资产的增长与市场波动没有任何因果关系。宏观经济因素与市场波动具有很强的正相关关系,而市场波动与指数增长之间的相关性为负且绝对值相对较小。•格兰杰因果检验表明,宏观经济因素确实与市场波动存在因果关系,并且是市场波动的有用预测因素。然而,指数的增长没有这种关系,也不是市场波动的有用预测指标。•宏观经济因素,如经济政策的不确定性,而不是指数资产的增长,是市场波动加剧的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
With Greater Uncertainty Comes Greater Volatility
Some academics and market participants argue that the growth of indexing causes market volatility. However, while the percentage of assets in indexed strategies has grown over the past twenty-five years, market volatility has risen and fallen in a somewhat random pattern, peaking around economic and financial crises. In this article, we test two measures of market volatility for their potential relationship with growth in indexing assets and selected macroeconomic factors. Our analysis demonstrates that macroeconomic factors have a strong correlation with and are useful predictors of market volatility; on the other hand, growth in indexing assets does not exhibit any causal relationship with market volatility. TOPIC: Volatility measures Key Findings • Macroeconomic factors and market volatility have a strong positive correlation while correlation between market volatility and growth of indexing is negative and relatively small in absolute terms. • Granger causality tests suggest that macroeconomic factors do have a causal relationship with and are useful predictors of market volatility. Growth of indexing, however, does not have such a relationship and is not a useful predictor of market volatility. • Macroeconomic factors such as economic policy uncertainty—not the growth of indexing assets—are responsible for elevated market volatility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1