科技殖民主义:旧金山殖民时代的中产阶级化、抵抗和归属感

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1353/anq.2022.0045
M. Maharawal
{"title":"科技殖民主义:旧金山殖民时代的中产阶级化、抵抗和归属感","authors":"M. Maharawal","doi":"10.1353/anq.2022.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article theorizes tech-led gentrification in San Francisco as a form of what I call, \"tech-colonialism.\" Drawing on my ethnographic work with movements organizing against eviction and displacement, this article grapples with the critique from activists and protestors that gentrification and the tech-industry are \"colonizing\" the city. Taking this seriously, I argue that the analytic of \"colonialism\" provided San Francisco residents and activists with an important framework for political organizing, identity-making, solidarity-work, and forging belonging amidst the city's on-going \"eviction epidemic.\" Beyond the discursive deployment by activists of \"colonialism\" as a concept, I also trace the material continuities between historical forms of colonial dispossession and present-day tech-colonialism, in which technology companies enclose the \"commons,\" operate above laws, invest surplus capital in speculative urban racialized property regimes, and treat governments themselves as outdated and archaic institutions to be \"disrupted.\" Ultimately, I define tech-colonialism as the social and spatial strategies of the technology industry that operate through colonial logics of racialized dispossession and materially extend and reproduce the colonial present.","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"95 1","pages":"785 - 813"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tech-Colonialism: Gentrification, Resistance, and Belonging in San Francisco's Colonial Present\",\"authors\":\"M. Maharawal\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/anq.2022.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This article theorizes tech-led gentrification in San Francisco as a form of what I call, \\\"tech-colonialism.\\\" Drawing on my ethnographic work with movements organizing against eviction and displacement, this article grapples with the critique from activists and protestors that gentrification and the tech-industry are \\\"colonizing\\\" the city. Taking this seriously, I argue that the analytic of \\\"colonialism\\\" provided San Francisco residents and activists with an important framework for political organizing, identity-making, solidarity-work, and forging belonging amidst the city's on-going \\\"eviction epidemic.\\\" Beyond the discursive deployment by activists of \\\"colonialism\\\" as a concept, I also trace the material continuities between historical forms of colonial dispossession and present-day tech-colonialism, in which technology companies enclose the \\\"commons,\\\" operate above laws, invest surplus capital in speculative urban racialized property regimes, and treat governments themselves as outdated and archaic institutions to be \\\"disrupted.\\\" Ultimately, I define tech-colonialism as the social and spatial strategies of the technology industry that operate through colonial logics of racialized dispossession and materially extend and reproduce the colonial present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"785 - 813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文将科技主导的旧金山中产阶级化理论化为一种我称之为“科技殖民主义”的形式。根据我与反对驱逐和流离失所的运动组织的民族志工作,这篇文章努力应对来自活动家和抗议者的批评,即士绅化和科技产业正在“殖民”城市。认真对待这一点,我认为,对“殖民主义”的分析为旧金山居民和活动家提供了一个重要的框架,用于政治组织、身份塑造、团结工作,以及在城市持续的“驱逐流行病”中建立归属感。除了积极分子将“殖民主义”作为一个概念的话语展开之外,我还追溯了殖民剥夺的历史形式与当今技术殖民主义之间的物质连续性,其中技术公司将“公地”封闭起来,在法律之上运作,将剩余资本投资于投机性的城市种族化财产制度,并将政府本身视为过时和陈旧的机构,需要“破坏”。最后,我将技术殖民主义定义为技术产业的社会和空间策略,它通过种族化剥夺的殖民逻辑运作,并在物质上延伸和复制殖民的现在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tech-Colonialism: Gentrification, Resistance, and Belonging in San Francisco's Colonial Present
ABSTRACT:This article theorizes tech-led gentrification in San Francisco as a form of what I call, "tech-colonialism." Drawing on my ethnographic work with movements organizing against eviction and displacement, this article grapples with the critique from activists and protestors that gentrification and the tech-industry are "colonizing" the city. Taking this seriously, I argue that the analytic of "colonialism" provided San Francisco residents and activists with an important framework for political organizing, identity-making, solidarity-work, and forging belonging amidst the city's on-going "eviction epidemic." Beyond the discursive deployment by activists of "colonialism" as a concept, I also trace the material continuities between historical forms of colonial dispossession and present-day tech-colonialism, in which technology companies enclose the "commons," operate above laws, invest surplus capital in speculative urban racialized property regimes, and treat governments themselves as outdated and archaic institutions to be "disrupted." Ultimately, I define tech-colonialism as the social and spatial strategies of the technology industry that operate through colonial logics of racialized dispossession and materially extend and reproduce the colonial present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
期刊最新文献
The Copy Generic: How the Nonspecific Makes our Social Worlds by Scott MacLochlainn (review) Whetū Mārama/Bright Star dir Toby Mills and Aileen O’Sullivan (review) Screen Media, Technological Innovation and the State in Nigeria Language In Culture: Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language by Michael Silverstein (review) Crazy, Stupid, Lying, Traitors: Eritrean Politics and Extreme Speech Online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1