使用BSC和COBIT 4.1评估银行公司的信息技术治理

IF 0.5 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems Pub Date : 2021-05-24 DOI:10.29040/IJCIS.V2I2.27
Elvis Pawan
{"title":"使用BSC和COBIT 4.1评估银行公司的信息技术治理","authors":"Elvis Pawan","doi":"10.29040/IJCIS.V2I2.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract - The era of industrial revolution 4.0, the progress of companies to achieve their vision and mission goals, is largely determined by the role of information technology, especially banking companies such as BPR PMM, the problem is that BPR PPM has not fully realized the importance of managing a business change, in order to maintain the company's existence. To determine the maturity level of the application of information technology in a company, it is necessary to conduct a thorough evaluation. In this study, there are seventeen processes in Cobit 4.1 that are solved on an internal balanced scorecard perspective. Cobit is a framework that is very well used in measuring the effectiveness of the application of information technology, while the balanced scorecard (BSC) is a framework that is very suitable to be applied to measure or assess the performance of a company. The combination of the two frameworks can provide a clear picture of internal perspectives that can be used by company leaders in improving information technology governance. This study resulted in a conclusion that the company maturity level in terms of business change management based on Cobit 4.1 and the internal balanced scorecard perspective has an average value of 2.90 at level 3 with defined categories.","PeriodicalId":54966,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Information Technology Governance in Banking Companies Using BSC and COBIT 4.1\",\"authors\":\"Elvis Pawan\",\"doi\":\"10.29040/IJCIS.V2I2.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract - The era of industrial revolution 4.0, the progress of companies to achieve their vision and mission goals, is largely determined by the role of information technology, especially banking companies such as BPR PMM, the problem is that BPR PPM has not fully realized the importance of managing a business change, in order to maintain the company's existence. To determine the maturity level of the application of information technology in a company, it is necessary to conduct a thorough evaluation. In this study, there are seventeen processes in Cobit 4.1 that are solved on an internal balanced scorecard perspective. Cobit is a framework that is very well used in measuring the effectiveness of the application of information technology, while the balanced scorecard (BSC) is a framework that is very suitable to be applied to measure or assess the performance of a company. The combination of the two frameworks can provide a clear picture of internal perspectives that can be used by company leaders in improving information technology governance. This study resulted in a conclusion that the company maturity level in terms of business change management based on Cobit 4.1 and the internal balanced scorecard perspective has an average value of 2.90 at level 3 with defined categories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29040/IJCIS.V2I2.27\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29040/IJCIS.V2I2.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:工业革命4.0时代,企业能否实现自己的愿景和使命目标,很大程度上是由信息技术的作用决定的,尤其是银行公司的BPR PPM,问题在于BPR PPM没有充分认识到管理企业变革的重要性,以维持公司的存在。为了确定一个公司信息技术应用的成熟度,有必要进行全面的评估。在本研究中,Cobit 4.1中有17个过程是在内部平衡计分卡的角度上解决的。Cobit是一个非常适合用于衡量信息技术应用有效性的框架,而平衡计分卡(BSC)是一个非常适合用于衡量或评估公司绩效的框架。这两个框架的结合可以提供一个内部视角的清晰画面,公司领导者可以使用它来改进信息技术治理。本研究得出的结论是,基于Cobit 4.1和内部平衡计分卡视角的业务变更管理方面的公司成熟度水平在具有定义类别的第3级的平均值为2.90。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Information Technology Governance in Banking Companies Using BSC and COBIT 4.1
Abstract - The era of industrial revolution 4.0, the progress of companies to achieve their vision and mission goals, is largely determined by the role of information technology, especially banking companies such as BPR PMM, the problem is that BPR PPM has not fully realized the importance of managing a business change, in order to maintain the company's existence. To determine the maturity level of the application of information technology in a company, it is necessary to conduct a thorough evaluation. In this study, there are seventeen processes in Cobit 4.1 that are solved on an internal balanced scorecard perspective. Cobit is a framework that is very well used in measuring the effectiveness of the application of information technology, while the balanced scorecard (BSC) is a framework that is very suitable to be applied to measure or assess the performance of a company. The combination of the two frameworks can provide a clear picture of internal perspectives that can be used by company leaders in improving information technology governance. This study resulted in a conclusion that the company maturity level in terms of business change management based on Cobit 4.1 and the internal balanced scorecard perspective has an average value of 2.90 at level 3 with defined categories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The paradigm for the next generation of information systems (ISs) will involve large numbers of ISs distributed over large, complex computer/communication networks. Such ISs will manage or have access to large amounts of information and computing services and will interoperate as required. These support individual or collaborative human work. Communication among component systems will be done using protocols that range from conventional ones to those based on distributed AI. We call such next generation ISs Cooperative Information Systems (CIS). The International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS) addresses the intricacies of cooperative work in the framework of distributed interoperable information systems. It provides a forum for the presentation and dissemination of research covering all aspects of CIS design, requirements, functionality, implementation, deployment, and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Secured Framework with a Hash Function-Enabled Keyword Search in Cloud Storage Services Edge Computing Security of Mobile Communication System Based on Computer Algorithms CC2530-based wireless data long-distance communication simulation design and application ACSICS: Joint Distribution Mode Integrating Agricultural Industry Chain Logistics Under the Background of Artificial Intelligence IMRCDS: Study on Soft Sensing Model of Multi-component System Concentration Based on Linear Superposition of Single Molecule System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1