如何登上顶峰——理性和不文明的用户评论对他们在Facebook政治在线讨论中的可见度的影响

IF 1.9 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Research Reports Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/08824096.2022.2120861
Pablo Jost, Marc Ziegele
{"title":"如何登上顶峰——理性和不文明的用户评论对他们在Facebook政治在线讨论中的可见度的影响","authors":"Pablo Jost, Marc Ziegele","doi":"10.1080/08824096.2022.2120861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research on user comments has found that incivility in online discussions affect readers’ attitudes, feelings, and their willingness to participate in discussions. Yet the extent to which users encounter these comments in their daily routine is largely unknown. On social network sites, the number of interactions with comments, particularly the Likes and replies they receive, determines their visibility and, therefore, their potential impact on users. The study argues that the presence of rationality, personal incivility, and anti-democratic incivility in comments is related to the number of interactions that comments receive. The results of a content analysis of 2,241 comments below 499 news posts on Facebook largely support this assumption, revealing a positive association between comment rationality and the number of interactions, but also between personal incivility and interactions. Anti-democratic incivility is positively associated only with the number of replies to a comment but not with the number of Likes.","PeriodicalId":47084,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research Reports","volume":"39 1","pages":"224 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to get on top – the effect of rationality and incivility of user comments on their visibility in political online discussions on Facebook\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Jost, Marc Ziegele\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08824096.2022.2120861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Research on user comments has found that incivility in online discussions affect readers’ attitudes, feelings, and their willingness to participate in discussions. Yet the extent to which users encounter these comments in their daily routine is largely unknown. On social network sites, the number of interactions with comments, particularly the Likes and replies they receive, determines their visibility and, therefore, their potential impact on users. The study argues that the presence of rationality, personal incivility, and anti-democratic incivility in comments is related to the number of interactions that comments receive. The results of a content analysis of 2,241 comments below 499 news posts on Facebook largely support this assumption, revealing a positive association between comment rationality and the number of interactions, but also between personal incivility and interactions. Anti-democratic incivility is positively associated only with the number of replies to a comment but not with the number of Likes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"224 - 235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2022.2120861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2022.2120861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对用户评论的研究发现,网络讨论中的不文明行为会影响读者的态度、感受和参与讨论的意愿。然而,用户在日常生活中遇到这些评论的程度在很大程度上是未知的。在社交网站上,评论的互动数量,特别是他们收到的喜欢和回复,决定了他们的可见性,因此,他们对用户的潜在影响。该研究认为,评论中理性、个人不文明和反民主不文明的存在与评论收到的互动次数有关。对Facebook上499条新闻帖子下的2241条评论的内容分析结果在很大程度上支持了这一假设,揭示了评论合理性与互动次数之间的正相关关系,以及个人不文明与互动之间的正相关关系。反民主的不文明行为只与一条评论的回复数量呈正相关,而与点赞数量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to get on top – the effect of rationality and incivility of user comments on their visibility in political online discussions on Facebook
ABSTRACT Research on user comments has found that incivility in online discussions affect readers’ attitudes, feelings, and their willingness to participate in discussions. Yet the extent to which users encounter these comments in their daily routine is largely unknown. On social network sites, the number of interactions with comments, particularly the Likes and replies they receive, determines their visibility and, therefore, their potential impact on users. The study argues that the presence of rationality, personal incivility, and anti-democratic incivility in comments is related to the number of interactions that comments receive. The results of a content analysis of 2,241 comments below 499 news posts on Facebook largely support this assumption, revealing a positive association between comment rationality and the number of interactions, but also between personal incivility and interactions. Anti-democratic incivility is positively associated only with the number of replies to a comment but not with the number of Likes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Extending the communication during sexual activity model: what role does sexual communication self-efficacy play? Conflict styles within individualistic, low power distance, and low context nations: a four nation comparison Science terms elicit ideological differences in message processing Development and validation of the commitment to social activism scale using the Thurstone scaling procedure Patient perceptions of healthcare provider (un)helpful approaches to explaining health information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1