{"title":"继续提问","authors":"C. Fowler","doi":"10.37718/CSA.2016.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I would like to start by congratulating Liv Nilsson Stutz on her impressive, wide-ranging review which weaves some important points into a cogent argument for an increasingly transdisciplinary archaeology of death and burial. I agree with most of her arguments and will take them as grounds for further exploration. I will sound a quiet note of caution about crystallizing (sub)disciplinary boundaries and favour asking questions rather than defining disciplinary territories.","PeriodicalId":38457,"journal":{"name":"Current Swedish Archaeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keep Asking Questions\",\"authors\":\"C. Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.37718/CSA.2016.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I would like to start by congratulating Liv Nilsson Stutz on her impressive, wide-ranging review which weaves some important points into a cogent argument for an increasingly transdisciplinary archaeology of death and burial. I agree with most of her arguments and will take them as grounds for further exploration. I will sound a quiet note of caution about crystallizing (sub)disciplinary boundaries and favour asking questions rather than defining disciplinary territories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Swedish Archaeology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Swedish Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2016.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Swedish Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2016.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
I would like to start by congratulating Liv Nilsson Stutz on her impressive, wide-ranging review which weaves some important points into a cogent argument for an increasingly transdisciplinary archaeology of death and burial. I agree with most of her arguments and will take them as grounds for further exploration. I will sound a quiet note of caution about crystallizing (sub)disciplinary boundaries and favour asking questions rather than defining disciplinary territories.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
