权力的恢复性实践:一个社会工作的镜头

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Children & Schools Pub Date : 2020-05-08 DOI:10.1093/cs/cdaa006
Hilary Lustick, C. Norton, Sonia Rey Lopez, Jennifer Greene-Rooks
{"title":"权力的恢复性实践:一个社会工作的镜头","authors":"Hilary Lustick, C. Norton, Sonia Rey Lopez, Jennifer Greene-Rooks","doi":"10.1093/cs/cdaa006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies demonstrate that preventive practices, including restorative practices and social and emotional learning, reduce the need for suspension. However, emerging findings suggest that preventive practices perpetuate the same rates of racial disproportionality in suspension as traditional disciplinary codes; evidence of persistent racial disproportionality appears in research on restorative practices. The purpose of this study was to examine, through interviews with teachers and students, the successes and challenges of implementing community-building circles with attention to equity and inclusion. Authors found that both teachers and students experience these practices as transformative when enough trust is established to share openly; however, more training is necessary for this to be consistent across schools and classrooms. Considering the lack of discussion of implicit bias and cultural responsiveness embedded in the restorative practice trainings these teachers received, authors argue that social work professionals and concepts—namely,empowerment theory— can support teacher training and implementation of community-building circles.","PeriodicalId":35453,"journal":{"name":"Children & Schools","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cs/cdaa006","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorative Practices for Empowerment: A Social Work Lens\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Lustick, C. Norton, Sonia Rey Lopez, Jennifer Greene-Rooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cs/cdaa006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies demonstrate that preventive practices, including restorative practices and social and emotional learning, reduce the need for suspension. However, emerging findings suggest that preventive practices perpetuate the same rates of racial disproportionality in suspension as traditional disciplinary codes; evidence of persistent racial disproportionality appears in research on restorative practices. The purpose of this study was to examine, through interviews with teachers and students, the successes and challenges of implementing community-building circles with attention to equity and inclusion. Authors found that both teachers and students experience these practices as transformative when enough trust is established to share openly; however, more training is necessary for this to be consistent across schools and classrooms. Considering the lack of discussion of implicit bias and cultural responsiveness embedded in the restorative practice trainings these teachers received, authors argue that social work professionals and concepts—namely,empowerment theory— can support teacher training and implementation of community-building circles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children & Schools\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cs/cdaa006\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children & Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdaa006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children & Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdaa006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

研究表明,预防性做法,包括恢复性做法以及社会和情感学习,减少了停课的必要性。然而,新出现的调查结果表明,预防性做法使停职期间种族比例失调的比率与传统纪律守则相同;关于恢复性做法的研究中出现了持续存在的种族不均衡现象的证据。本研究的目的是通过对教师和学生的采访,检验实施注重公平和包容的社区建设圈的成功和挑战。作者发现,当建立了足够的信任来公开分享时,教师和学生都会将这些做法视为变革;然而,为了在学校和课堂上保持一致,需要更多的培训。考虑到这些教师接受的恢复性实践培训中缺乏对隐性偏见和文化反应性的讨论,作者认为社会工作专业人员和概念——即赋权理论——可以支持教师培训和社区建设圈的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restorative Practices for Empowerment: A Social Work Lens
Studies demonstrate that preventive practices, including restorative practices and social and emotional learning, reduce the need for suspension. However, emerging findings suggest that preventive practices perpetuate the same rates of racial disproportionality in suspension as traditional disciplinary codes; evidence of persistent racial disproportionality appears in research on restorative practices. The purpose of this study was to examine, through interviews with teachers and students, the successes and challenges of implementing community-building circles with attention to equity and inclusion. Authors found that both teachers and students experience these practices as transformative when enough trust is established to share openly; however, more training is necessary for this to be consistent across schools and classrooms. Considering the lack of discussion of implicit bias and cultural responsiveness embedded in the restorative practice trainings these teachers received, authors argue that social work professionals and concepts—namely,empowerment theory— can support teacher training and implementation of community-building circles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children & Schools
Children & Schools SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Children & Schools publishes professional materials relevant to social work services for children. The journal publishes articles on innovations in practice, interdisciplinary efforts, research, program evaluation, policy, and planning. Topics include student-authority relationships, multiculturalism, early intervention, needs assessment, violence, and ADHD. Children & Schools is a practitioner-to-practitioner resource.
期刊最新文献
Children & Schools From Intent to Impact: Building University-Assisted Community Schools in New Mexico School-Based Postvention Services: Exploring the Perspectives of Students Role of School Quality and Neighborhood Disadvantage in Educational Attainment: Do They Vary by Race? Schools and Juvenile Treatment Drug Courts: A Case Study on Treatment Access through Collaboration and Advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1