{"title":"节肢蟋蟀(Kieffer 1906)和异肢蟋蟀(Boesel 1983)幼虫的描述及其幼虫、蛹和成虫阶段的关键鉴别(双翅目:手蛾科)","authors":"H.P.J.J. Cuppen, S. Gresens, D. Tempelman","doi":"10.5324/cjcr.v0i33.2985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The larva of two very similar Cricotopus species are described for the first time: Cricotopus diversus (Nearctic) and C. festivellus, new description (West Palaearctic). Confusion can arise depending on the source used for identification of Nearctic Cricotopus. The key of LeSage and Harrison (1980) treated adults and exuviae of C. diversus as variants of C. festivellus. Subsequently Boesel (1983) formally described C. diversus and included it in keys to adult Cricotopus of the eastern United States. Adults of these species have been distinguished by consistent differences in the pigmentation on the fourth and fifth abdominal tergites; we also confirmed differences in the structure of the male hypopygium. Keys to larvae, pupal exuviae and adult males are presented. Publicly available DNA barcode records document C. diversus populations in the Mid-Atlantic US and Ontario, Canada, whereas barcode records of C. festivellus were available only for Scandinavia, although this species is widely distributed in Western Europe. These two species are genetically distinct, with 13% mean difference in barcode sequence between species. Both species are reported from rivers and lakes of relatively good water quality.","PeriodicalId":30852,"journal":{"name":"CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"4-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Description of the larvae of Cricotopus festivellus (Kieffer 1906) and Cricotopus diversus (Boesel 1983) with keys to discrimination of larval, pupal and adult stages (Diptera: Chironomidae)\",\"authors\":\"H.P.J.J. Cuppen, S. Gresens, D. Tempelman\",\"doi\":\"10.5324/cjcr.v0i33.2985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The larva of two very similar Cricotopus species are described for the first time: Cricotopus diversus (Nearctic) and C. festivellus, new description (West Palaearctic). Confusion can arise depending on the source used for identification of Nearctic Cricotopus. The key of LeSage and Harrison (1980) treated adults and exuviae of C. diversus as variants of C. festivellus. Subsequently Boesel (1983) formally described C. diversus and included it in keys to adult Cricotopus of the eastern United States. Adults of these species have been distinguished by consistent differences in the pigmentation on the fourth and fifth abdominal tergites; we also confirmed differences in the structure of the male hypopygium. Keys to larvae, pupal exuviae and adult males are presented. Publicly available DNA barcode records document C. diversus populations in the Mid-Atlantic US and Ontario, Canada, whereas barcode records of C. festivellus were available only for Scandinavia, although this species is widely distributed in Western Europe. These two species are genetically distinct, with 13% mean difference in barcode sequence between species. Both species are reported from rivers and lakes of relatively good water quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"4-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5324/cjcr.v0i33.2985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/cjcr.v0i33.2985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文首次报道了两种非常相似的Cricotopus diversus (Nearctic)和C. festivellus, new description (West palenorth)的幼虫。根据用于鉴定新北极Cricotopus的来源,可能会产生混淆。LeSage和Harrison(1980)将C. diversus的成虫和蜕皮虫视为C. festivellus的变种。随后Boesel(1983)正式描述了C. diversus,并将其纳入美国东部成年Cricotopus的关键。这些物种的成虫在第4和第5腹肌上的色素沉着一致差异;我们也证实了男性性功能减退在结构上的差异。给出了幼虫、蛹蜕皮和成年雄虫的钥匙。公开的DNA条形码记录记录了C. diversus在美国大西洋中部和加拿大安大略省的种群,而C. festivellus的条形码记录仅在斯堪的纳维亚地区可用,尽管该物种广泛分布于西欧。这两个物种在遗传上是不同的,物种之间的条形码序列平均差异为13%。据报道,这两种物种都来自水质相对较好的河流和湖泊。
Description of the larvae of Cricotopus festivellus (Kieffer 1906) and Cricotopus diversus (Boesel 1983) with keys to discrimination of larval, pupal and adult stages (Diptera: Chironomidae)
The larva of two very similar Cricotopus species are described for the first time: Cricotopus diversus (Nearctic) and C. festivellus, new description (West Palaearctic). Confusion can arise depending on the source used for identification of Nearctic Cricotopus. The key of LeSage and Harrison (1980) treated adults and exuviae of C. diversus as variants of C. festivellus. Subsequently Boesel (1983) formally described C. diversus and included it in keys to adult Cricotopus of the eastern United States. Adults of these species have been distinguished by consistent differences in the pigmentation on the fourth and fifth abdominal tergites; we also confirmed differences in the structure of the male hypopygium. Keys to larvae, pupal exuviae and adult males are presented. Publicly available DNA barcode records document C. diversus populations in the Mid-Atlantic US and Ontario, Canada, whereas barcode records of C. festivellus were available only for Scandinavia, although this species is widely distributed in Western Europe. These two species are genetically distinct, with 13% mean difference in barcode sequence between species. Both species are reported from rivers and lakes of relatively good water quality.