斯洛伐克议会新冠肺炎疫情期间的快速立法程序

Q3 Social Sciences Comparative Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.12775/clr.2022.010
Miroslav Čellár
{"title":"斯洛伐克议会新冠肺炎疫情期间的快速立法程序","authors":"Miroslav Čellár","doi":"10.12775/clr.2022.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid–19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the way we live and work. Even today, although the pandemic seems to be over, our lives are not the same as before. This has also had an impact on the functioning of constitutional bodies. We are of the opinion that adherence to the principles of democracy and the rule of law is particularly important to ensure the stability of the system in exceptional situations, such as in the case of the Covid–19 pandemic. The institution of fast-track legislative procedure (FTP) is an exceptional instrument for dealing with exceptional situations. Its purpose is to enable the Government and Parliament to take quick decisions. However, it must not be abused as this may lead to the violation of a considerable number of constitutional rules and principles. A number of tools can be used to defend against such action, such as Parliament’s rejection of the Government’s FTP proposal, the President’s intervention through his relative veto power, but above all, the Constitutional Court’s decision that a law is incompatible with the Constitution because of a breach of the rules of the legislative process.","PeriodicalId":36604,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast-Track Legislative Procedure During the COVID–19 Pandemic in Slovak Parliamentarism\",\"authors\":\"Miroslav Čellár\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/clr.2022.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Covid–19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the way we live and work. Even today, although the pandemic seems to be over, our lives are not the same as before. This has also had an impact on the functioning of constitutional bodies. We are of the opinion that adherence to the principles of democracy and the rule of law is particularly important to ensure the stability of the system in exceptional situations, such as in the case of the Covid–19 pandemic. The institution of fast-track legislative procedure (FTP) is an exceptional instrument for dealing with exceptional situations. Its purpose is to enable the Government and Parliament to take quick decisions. However, it must not be abused as this may lead to the violation of a considerable number of constitutional rules and principles. A number of tools can be used to defend against such action, such as Parliament’s rejection of the Government’s FTP proposal, the President’s intervention through his relative veto power, but above all, the Constitutional Court’s decision that a law is incompatible with the Constitution because of a breach of the rules of the legislative process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2022.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2022.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎-19大流行从根本上改变了我们的生活和工作方式。即使在今天,尽管疫情似乎已经结束,但我们的生活与以前不同了。这也对宪法机构的运作产生了影响。我们认为,在特殊情况下,如在新冠肺炎-19大流行的情况下,坚持民主和法治原则对于确保该系统的稳定尤为重要。快速立法程序制度是处理特殊情况的一个特殊工具。其目的是使政府和议会能够迅速作出决定。然而,它决不能被滥用,因为这可能导致违反相当多的宪法规则和原则。可以使用一些工具来防范这种行动,例如议会拒绝政府的FTP提案,总统通过其相对否决权进行干预,但最重要的是,宪法法院裁定一项法律因违反立法程序规则而与宪法不符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fast-Track Legislative Procedure During the COVID–19 Pandemic in Slovak Parliamentarism
The Covid–19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the way we live and work. Even today, although the pandemic seems to be over, our lives are not the same as before. This has also had an impact on the functioning of constitutional bodies. We are of the opinion that adherence to the principles of democracy and the rule of law is particularly important to ensure the stability of the system in exceptional situations, such as in the case of the Covid–19 pandemic. The institution of fast-track legislative procedure (FTP) is an exceptional instrument for dealing with exceptional situations. Its purpose is to enable the Government and Parliament to take quick decisions. However, it must not be abused as this may lead to the violation of a considerable number of constitutional rules and principles. A number of tools can be used to defend against such action, such as Parliament’s rejection of the Government’s FTP proposal, the President’s intervention through his relative veto power, but above all, the Constitutional Court’s decision that a law is incompatible with the Constitution because of a breach of the rules of the legislative process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Law Review
Comparative Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Balancing Business Objectives and Shareholders’ Rights in Voluntary Delisting: a Comparative Analysis of Selected Legal Jurisdictions A Comparative Study of Child Pornography Laws in the Republic of Korea and in Thailand against the Background of International Legal Frameworks International Arbitration as an Alternative Method for Settling Administrative Disputes in the Kuwaiti Law Validity of the Arbitration Clause in the International Employment Contract: the Viewpoint of the GCC Countries Protection of the Rights of Workers of Industrial Enterprises by International Humanitarian Law (on the Example of the War in Ukraine)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1