新冠肺炎对一级创伤中心手外科转移的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203
Stephen A. Stearns, Clay B. Beagles, Katherine Hegermiller, C. Harper
{"title":"新冠肺炎对一级创伤中心手外科转移的影响","authors":"Stephen A. Stearns, Clay B. Beagles, Katherine Hegermiller, C. Harper","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted elective surgical volume across the country; however, its effect on urgent transfers is unclear. This study sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on transfers for hand surgery evaluation at a single quaternary referral center during the initial 3 mo of state mandated restrictions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the rate and character of transfers for hand surgery evaluation from March to June of 2020 to a temporally matched cohort averaged across 2018 and 2019. The primary outcome of this study was transfer frequency, with secondary outcomes of treatment rendered and type of disposition. Results: The rate of transfer between emergency departments for hand surgery evaluation was not statistically different from before to during COVID (ED-to-ED transfer rate: 4.3% and 5.1% respectively, P=0.68). Patient demographics were similar, with no difference in age (pre-COVID-19 mean 48.6 yr vs. intra-COVID-19 mean 53.2 yr, P=0.31) or type of insurance (P=0.99). Regarding reason for transfer, both cohorts were similar in the number of transfers for trauma versus infection (pre-COVID-19 infection: 11 trauma: 20.5 vs. intra-COVID-19 infection: 4 trauma: 17 P=0.99). We observed similar rates of transfers requiring procedural intervention (pre-COVID-19 69.8% vs. intra-COVID-19 57.1% P=0.19). Lastly, there was no difference in admission patterns, with pre-COVID-19 rates (71.4%) similar to those during COVID-19 (52%) P=0.15. Conclusions: Despite the many changes to healthcare in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of transferring for evaluation to a Level 1 hand surgery center was similar to pre-pandemic years. Level VI Evidence: Presenting a single descriptive study.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"103 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery transfers at a level-1 trauma center\",\"authors\":\"Stephen A. Stearns, Clay B. Beagles, Katherine Hegermiller, C. Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted elective surgical volume across the country; however, its effect on urgent transfers is unclear. This study sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on transfers for hand surgery evaluation at a single quaternary referral center during the initial 3 mo of state mandated restrictions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the rate and character of transfers for hand surgery evaluation from March to June of 2020 to a temporally matched cohort averaged across 2018 and 2019. The primary outcome of this study was transfer frequency, with secondary outcomes of treatment rendered and type of disposition. Results: The rate of transfer between emergency departments for hand surgery evaluation was not statistically different from before to during COVID (ED-to-ED transfer rate: 4.3% and 5.1% respectively, P=0.68). Patient demographics were similar, with no difference in age (pre-COVID-19 mean 48.6 yr vs. intra-COVID-19 mean 53.2 yr, P=0.31) or type of insurance (P=0.99). Regarding reason for transfer, both cohorts were similar in the number of transfers for trauma versus infection (pre-COVID-19 infection: 11 trauma: 20.5 vs. intra-COVID-19 infection: 4 trauma: 17 P=0.99). We observed similar rates of transfers requiring procedural intervention (pre-COVID-19 69.8% vs. intra-COVID-19 57.1% P=0.19). Lastly, there was no difference in admission patterns, with pre-COVID-19 rates (71.4%) similar to those during COVID-19 (52%) P=0.15. Conclusions: Despite the many changes to healthcare in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of transferring for evaluation to a Level 1 hand surgery center was similar to pre-pandemic years. Level VI Evidence: Presenting a single descriptive study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"103 - 105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新冠肺炎大流行显著影响了全国择期手术量;然而,它对紧急转移的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在了解新冠肺炎在最初3个月的州强制限制期间对单一四级转诊中心手部手术评估转移的影响。方法:进行回顾性分析,将2020年3月至6月手部手术评估的转移率和特征与2018年和2019年的时间匹配队列平均值进行比较。这项研究的主要结果是转移频率,提供的治疗和处置类型的次要结果。结果:急诊科之间手部手术评估的转移率与COVID之前和期间相比没有统计学差异(ED到ED转移率分别为4.3%和5.1%,P=0.68)。患者人口统计学相似,年龄(COVID-19之前平均48.6岁,COVID-19-19内部平均53.2岁,P=0.31)或保险类型(P=0.99)没有差异。关于转移原因,两组患者的创伤转移次数与感染转移次数相似(COVID-19前感染:11例创伤:20.5例与COVID-19-19内感染:4例创伤:17例P=0.99)。我们观察到需要手术干预的转移率相似(COVID-19前69.8%与COVID内57.1%P=0.19)。最后,入院模式没有差异,新冠肺炎前发病率(71.4%)与新冠肺炎期间发病率(52%)相似,P=0.15。结论:尽管在新冠肺炎大流行期间,美国的医疗保健发生了许多变化,但转移到一级手外科中心进行评估的做法与大流行前类似。第六级证据:提出单一描述性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery transfers at a level-1 trauma center
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted elective surgical volume across the country; however, its effect on urgent transfers is unclear. This study sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on transfers for hand surgery evaluation at a single quaternary referral center during the initial 3 mo of state mandated restrictions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the rate and character of transfers for hand surgery evaluation from March to June of 2020 to a temporally matched cohort averaged across 2018 and 2019. The primary outcome of this study was transfer frequency, with secondary outcomes of treatment rendered and type of disposition. Results: The rate of transfer between emergency departments for hand surgery evaluation was not statistically different from before to during COVID (ED-to-ED transfer rate: 4.3% and 5.1% respectively, P=0.68). Patient demographics were similar, with no difference in age (pre-COVID-19 mean 48.6 yr vs. intra-COVID-19 mean 53.2 yr, P=0.31) or type of insurance (P=0.99). Regarding reason for transfer, both cohorts were similar in the number of transfers for trauma versus infection (pre-COVID-19 infection: 11 trauma: 20.5 vs. intra-COVID-19 infection: 4 trauma: 17 P=0.99). We observed similar rates of transfers requiring procedural intervention (pre-COVID-19 69.8% vs. intra-COVID-19 57.1% P=0.19). Lastly, there was no difference in admission patterns, with pre-COVID-19 rates (71.4%) similar to those during COVID-19 (52%) P=0.15. Conclusions: Despite the many changes to healthcare in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, the practice of transferring for evaluation to a Level 1 hand surgery center was similar to pre-pandemic years. Level VI Evidence: Presenting a single descriptive study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1