{"title":"TVA与75岁的草根阶层:规划经典的遗产","authors":"M. Hibbard, Kathryn I. Frank","doi":"10.1177/08854122231187573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planning struggles with the tension between professional expertise and public voice. The approaching 75th anniversary of Philip Selznick's classic, TVA and the Grass Roots, is an apt time to revisit that tension. In Selznick's analysis, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was a modernist institution aligning with local agricultural elites at the expense of vulnerable Black and poor farmers. He coined the term ‘informal co-optation’ to characterize TVA's affiliation with the powerful. We bring renewed attention to informal co-optation and the institutional aspects of engagement by examining how Selznick's analysis was received contemporaneously, and then considering recent scholarship and the current implications of Selznick's work.","PeriodicalId":54207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Literature","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TVA and the Grass Roots at 75: The Legacy of a Planning Classic\",\"authors\":\"M. Hibbard, Kathryn I. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08854122231187573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Planning struggles with the tension between professional expertise and public voice. The approaching 75th anniversary of Philip Selznick's classic, TVA and the Grass Roots, is an apt time to revisit that tension. In Selznick's analysis, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was a modernist institution aligning with local agricultural elites at the expense of vulnerable Black and poor farmers. He coined the term ‘informal co-optation’ to characterize TVA's affiliation with the powerful. We bring renewed attention to informal co-optation and the institutional aspects of engagement by examining how Selznick's analysis was received contemporaneously, and then considering recent scholarship and the current implications of Selznick's work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Planning Literature\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Planning Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231187573\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Literature","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231187573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
规划与专业知识和公众声音之间的紧张关系作斗争。菲利普·塞尔兹尼克(Philip Selznick)的经典作品《TVA与草根》(TVA and The Grass Roots)75周年纪念日即将到来,这是一个重新审视这种紧张关系的恰当时机。在塞尔兹尼克的分析中,田纳西河谷管理局(TVA)是一个现代主义机构,与当地农业精英结盟,以牺牲弱势黑人和贫困农民为代价。他创造了“非正式合作”一词来描述TVA与权贵的关系。我们通过研究Selznick的分析在同一时期是如何被接受的,然后考虑最近的学术研究和Selznick工作的当前影响,重新关注非正式的选择和参与的制度方面。
TVA and the Grass Roots at 75: The Legacy of a Planning Classic
Planning struggles with the tension between professional expertise and public voice. The approaching 75th anniversary of Philip Selznick's classic, TVA and the Grass Roots, is an apt time to revisit that tension. In Selznick's analysis, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was a modernist institution aligning with local agricultural elites at the expense of vulnerable Black and poor farmers. He coined the term ‘informal co-optation’ to characterize TVA's affiliation with the powerful. We bring renewed attention to informal co-optation and the institutional aspects of engagement by examining how Selznick's analysis was received contemporaneously, and then considering recent scholarship and the current implications of Selznick's work.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE publishes review articles and abstracts of recent literature in city and regional planning and design. A typical issue contains one to three refereed literature reviews; a Council of Planning Librarians (CPL) Bibliography; several hundred abstracts of recent journal articles and dissertations; and several hundred bibliographic listings. JPL aims to give the reader an understanding of the state of knowledge of the field for use in research or professional practice.