普通外科医生头皮重建技术——一例报告

Vignesh Varma, Rashmi Sreedhar, Chetan Gowda, Bhoomika R
{"title":"普通外科医生头皮重建技术——一例报告","authors":"Vignesh Varma, Rashmi Sreedhar, Chetan Gowda, Bhoomika R","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v12i3.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scalp injuries are extremely common and although most scalp lacerations/ injuries can be primarily repaired, few require flap coverage. This article discusses the various ways in which we have reconstructed the scalp. This article is a case series of six different cases that required flap reconstruction where six different techniques were used to obtain wound cover with good outcomes. Patients who presented to various smaller hospitals/nursing homes with availability of only a general surgeon and no super specialists in Rural Bangalore with the need for scalp reconstruction were considered for the study. The operative outcome of six different methods of scalp reconstruction/ repair that include four different  local flaps, a split skin graft with a wig and a pericranium burr hole drilling followed by split skin graft coverage have been studied. \nAll six cases were followed up for a period of one month post intervention and all of them had good functional and cosmetic outcomes with no complications. There was no incidence of surgical site infection, seroma, or flap/graft failure in the 6 cases included in our study. Both grafts and flaps are equally good modalities in scalp reconstruction, but the choice for which to use should be based on the need of the patient and the type of wound. Grafts can be considered in conditions where there is adequate soft tissue cover over the scalp and in wounds with larger surface area. Grafts have the advantage of being technically simpler and are associated with fewer complications/failure but cannot be used in injuries where the bone is exposed. Flaps have better cosmetic outcome but are technically more challenging.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scalp Reconstruction Techniques for the General Surgeon – A Case Report\",\"authors\":\"Vignesh Varma, Rashmi Sreedhar, Chetan Gowda, Bhoomika R\",\"doi\":\"10.14260/jemds.v12i3.368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scalp injuries are extremely common and although most scalp lacerations/ injuries can be primarily repaired, few require flap coverage. This article discusses the various ways in which we have reconstructed the scalp. This article is a case series of six different cases that required flap reconstruction where six different techniques were used to obtain wound cover with good outcomes. Patients who presented to various smaller hospitals/nursing homes with availability of only a general surgeon and no super specialists in Rural Bangalore with the need for scalp reconstruction were considered for the study. The operative outcome of six different methods of scalp reconstruction/ repair that include four different  local flaps, a split skin graft with a wig and a pericranium burr hole drilling followed by split skin graft coverage have been studied. \\nAll six cases were followed up for a period of one month post intervention and all of them had good functional and cosmetic outcomes with no complications. There was no incidence of surgical site infection, seroma, or flap/graft failure in the 6 cases included in our study. Both grafts and flaps are equally good modalities in scalp reconstruction, but the choice for which to use should be based on the need of the patient and the type of wound. Grafts can be considered in conditions where there is adequate soft tissue cover over the scalp and in wounds with larger surface area. Grafts have the advantage of being technically simpler and are associated with fewer complications/failure but cannot be used in injuries where the bone is exposed. Flaps have better cosmetic outcome but are technically more challenging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i3.368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i3.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头皮损伤是非常常见的,虽然大多数头皮撕裂/损伤可以主要修复,很少需要皮瓣覆盖。这篇文章讨论了我们重建头皮的各种方法。这篇文章是六个不同的病例,需要皮瓣重建,其中六种不同的技术,以获得良好的结果创面覆盖。本研究考虑了在班加罗尔农村只有普通外科医生而没有高级专家的各种小型医院/疗养院就诊的需要头皮重建的患者。本文研究了六种不同的头皮重建/修复方法的手术效果,包括四种不同的局部皮瓣,一种带假发的分裂皮移植和一种颅周钻孔,然后是分裂皮移植覆盖。6例患者术后随访1个月,功能及美观均良好,无并发症发生。在我们研究的6例病例中,没有发生手术部位感染、血清肿或皮瓣/移植物失败。在头皮重建中,移植物和皮瓣都是同样好的方式,但选择使用哪一种应根据患者的需要和伤口的类型而定。在头皮上有足够的软组织覆盖和伤口表面积较大的情况下,可以考虑移植。移植物的优点是技术简单,并发症/失败较少,但不能用于骨暴露的损伤。皮瓣有更好的美容效果,但在技术上更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scalp Reconstruction Techniques for the General Surgeon – A Case Report
Scalp injuries are extremely common and although most scalp lacerations/ injuries can be primarily repaired, few require flap coverage. This article discusses the various ways in which we have reconstructed the scalp. This article is a case series of six different cases that required flap reconstruction where six different techniques were used to obtain wound cover with good outcomes. Patients who presented to various smaller hospitals/nursing homes with availability of only a general surgeon and no super specialists in Rural Bangalore with the need for scalp reconstruction were considered for the study. The operative outcome of six different methods of scalp reconstruction/ repair that include four different  local flaps, a split skin graft with a wig and a pericranium burr hole drilling followed by split skin graft coverage have been studied. All six cases were followed up for a period of one month post intervention and all of them had good functional and cosmetic outcomes with no complications. There was no incidence of surgical site infection, seroma, or flap/graft failure in the 6 cases included in our study. Both grafts and flaps are equally good modalities in scalp reconstruction, but the choice for which to use should be based on the need of the patient and the type of wound. Grafts can be considered in conditions where there is adequate soft tissue cover over the scalp and in wounds with larger surface area. Grafts have the advantage of being technically simpler and are associated with fewer complications/failure but cannot be used in injuries where the bone is exposed. Flaps have better cosmetic outcome but are technically more challenging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1