韩国新冠肺炎大流行期间的补充预算

H. Jung
{"title":"韩国新冠肺炎大流行期间的补充预算","authors":"H. Jung","doi":"10.1080/12294659.2022.2047331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores the South Korean government’s fiscal response to the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to supplementary budgeting. In particular, we empirically examine the formulation of supplementary budgets and discuss its policy implications. We focus on South Korea, which effectively mitigated pandemic concerns in the early stage through expansionary fiscal policies. Our findings indicate that, first, budgetary projects that undergo the supplementary budgeting process in previous years tend to be organized again as the supplementary budget in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Second, information regarding the unused budget in the past, which is a widely adopted indicator of budget inefficiency, does not influence the supplementary budgeting process to improve budget efficiency. These results suggest that, in the face of time and information constraints, budgetary agencies obtain relevant information from past experiences to formulate the supplementary budget during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the positive effects are limited because agencies do not adequately utilize efficiency-related information.","PeriodicalId":39993,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Public Administration","volume":"27 1","pages":"38 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supplementary budgeting during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea\",\"authors\":\"H. Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12294659.2022.2047331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explores the South Korean government’s fiscal response to the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to supplementary budgeting. In particular, we empirically examine the formulation of supplementary budgets and discuss its policy implications. We focus on South Korea, which effectively mitigated pandemic concerns in the early stage through expansionary fiscal policies. Our findings indicate that, first, budgetary projects that undergo the supplementary budgeting process in previous years tend to be organized again as the supplementary budget in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Second, information regarding the unused budget in the past, which is a widely adopted indicator of budget inefficiency, does not influence the supplementary budgeting process to improve budget efficiency. These results suggest that, in the face of time and information constraints, budgetary agencies obtain relevant information from past experiences to formulate the supplementary budget during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the positive effects are limited because agencies do not adequately utilize efficiency-related information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2047331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2047331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了韩国政府应对新冠肺炎疫情的财政对策与补充预算的关系。特别是,我们实证研究了补充预算的制定,并讨论了其政策含义。我们关注的是韩国,它在早期通过扩张性财政政策有效缓解了对疫情的担忧。我们的研究结果表明,首先,前几年经过补充预算编制过程的预算项目往往会再次作为应对新冠肺炎危机的补充预算进行组织。第二,关于过去未使用预算的信息是一个被广泛采用的预算效率低的指标,不会影响提高预算效率的补充预算编制过程。这些结果表明,面对时间和信息的限制,预算机构从过去的经验中获得相关信息,以制定新冠肺炎大流行期间的补充预算;然而,积极影响是有限的,因为各机构没有充分利用与效率有关的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supplementary budgeting during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea
ABSTRACT This study explores the South Korean government’s fiscal response to the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to supplementary budgeting. In particular, we empirically examine the formulation of supplementary budgets and discuss its policy implications. We focus on South Korea, which effectively mitigated pandemic concerns in the early stage through expansionary fiscal policies. Our findings indicate that, first, budgetary projects that undergo the supplementary budgeting process in previous years tend to be organized again as the supplementary budget in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Second, information regarding the unused budget in the past, which is a widely adopted indicator of budget inefficiency, does not influence the supplementary budgeting process to improve budget efficiency. These results suggest that, in the face of time and information constraints, budgetary agencies obtain relevant information from past experiences to formulate the supplementary budget during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the positive effects are limited because agencies do not adequately utilize efficiency-related information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Public Administration
International Review of Public Administration Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Review of Public Administration (ISSN 1229-4659) is published biannually by the Korean Association for Public Administration (KAPA) to provide a worldwide audience with the opportunity for communication and further understanding on issues of public administration and policy. There will be a triple-blind peer review process for all submissions of articles of general interest. There are no particular limitations on subject areas as long as they are related to the field of public administration and policy or deal with public employees. Articles should be analytic and demonstrate the highest standards of excellence in conceptualization, craftsmanship, and methodology.
期刊最新文献
Curvilinear dynamics of job demands, resources, and resilience: the impact of HR practices on public managers Outsourcing and backsourcing in a time of crisis – experiences of double opportunism A systematic literature review of budget participation: foundations, trends, and ways forward How does the stringency of state tax and expenditure limitations influence opportunistic taxation? Rural and regional development in the age of digital platforms: platformization of the Japanese Furusato Nozei Hometown Tax Donation System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1