瑞士Hansson Pins®内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的回顾性研究

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001175
Tiziano Conti, M. Majewski
{"title":"瑞士Hansson Pins®内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的回顾性研究","authors":"Tiziano Conti, M. Majewski","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hansson Pins® (The Swemac Group, Linköping, Sweden) are devices for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures that are widely used in Scandinavia. The authors hypothesized that the pins could be used with satisfactory results outside of Scandinavia, that they were a valid alternative to cancellous screws and the dynamic hip screw, and that they also could be used in elderly patients. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients with femoral neck fractures who received internal fixation with Hansson Pins between January 2007 and December 2016 at the Oberengadin Hospital in Switzerland were included in this retrospective study. The hospital’s electronic database was searched for information, and questionnaires were sent to the patients. Results: After internal fixation with Hansson Pins, 22% of the patients needed a hip prosthesis. For patients 70 yr and older, this rate was 33%. For 60% of the patients who needed a hip prosthesis, the reason for arthroplasty was nonunion. For 20%, the reason was avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and for another 20% of the patients symptomatic coxarthrosis was the cause. Conclusions: The rate of salvage arthroplasties in this study was similar to the rates in the literature of Hansson Pins (mostly from studies performed in Scandinavia), cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws. The findings suggested that Hansson pins could be used with good results outside of Scandinavia and that they were a reasonable alternative to cancellous screws and the dynamic hip screw. The pins also could be used with satisfactory outcomes in elderly patients, but the rate of salvage arthroplasties would be higher. Level of Evidence: Level IV.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"525 - 529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective study on internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with Hansson Pins® in Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Tiziano Conti, M. Majewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hansson Pins® (The Swemac Group, Linköping, Sweden) are devices for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures that are widely used in Scandinavia. The authors hypothesized that the pins could be used with satisfactory results outside of Scandinavia, that they were a valid alternative to cancellous screws and the dynamic hip screw, and that they also could be used in elderly patients. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients with femoral neck fractures who received internal fixation with Hansson Pins between January 2007 and December 2016 at the Oberengadin Hospital in Switzerland were included in this retrospective study. The hospital’s electronic database was searched for information, and questionnaires were sent to the patients. Results: After internal fixation with Hansson Pins, 22% of the patients needed a hip prosthesis. For patients 70 yr and older, this rate was 33%. For 60% of the patients who needed a hip prosthesis, the reason for arthroplasty was nonunion. For 20%, the reason was avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and for another 20% of the patients symptomatic coxarthrosis was the cause. Conclusions: The rate of salvage arthroplasties in this study was similar to the rates in the literature of Hansson Pins (mostly from studies performed in Scandinavia), cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws. The findings suggested that Hansson pins could be used with good results outside of Scandinavia and that they were a reasonable alternative to cancellous screws and the dynamic hip screw. The pins also could be used with satisfactory outcomes in elderly patients, but the rate of salvage arthroplasties would be higher. Level of Evidence: Level IV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"525 - 529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Hansson Pins®(瑞典林雪平Swemac集团)是一种在斯堪的纳维亚广泛使用的股骨颈骨折内固定装置。作者假设,在斯堪的纳维亚半岛以外的地区,这些钉可以获得令人满意的效果,它们是松质螺钉和动态髋关节螺钉的有效替代品,也可以用于老年患者。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2007年1月至2016年12月在瑞士Oberengadin医院接受Hansson Pins内固定的65名连续股骨颈骨折患者。在医院的电子数据库中搜索信息,并向患者发送问卷。结果:Hansson钉内固定后,22%的患者需要髋关节假体。对于70岁及以上的患者,这一比率为33%。对于60%需要髋关节假体的患者,关节成形术的原因是骨不连。20%的患者的原因是股骨头缺血性坏死,另有20%的患者是有症状的髋关节病。结论:本研究中挽救性关节置换术的发生率与Hansson Pins(主要来自斯堪的纳维亚半岛的研究)、松质螺钉和动力髋螺钉的文献中的发生率相似。研究结果表明,Hansson钉在斯堪的纳维亚半岛以外的地区使用效果良好,是松质螺钉和动态髋关节螺钉的合理替代品。针也可以在老年患者中使用,结果令人满意,但挽救关节置换术的比率会更高。证据级别:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A retrospective study on internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with Hansson Pins® in Switzerland
Background: Hansson Pins® (The Swemac Group, Linköping, Sweden) are devices for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures that are widely used in Scandinavia. The authors hypothesized that the pins could be used with satisfactory results outside of Scandinavia, that they were a valid alternative to cancellous screws and the dynamic hip screw, and that they also could be used in elderly patients. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients with femoral neck fractures who received internal fixation with Hansson Pins between January 2007 and December 2016 at the Oberengadin Hospital in Switzerland were included in this retrospective study. The hospital’s electronic database was searched for information, and questionnaires were sent to the patients. Results: After internal fixation with Hansson Pins, 22% of the patients needed a hip prosthesis. For patients 70 yr and older, this rate was 33%. For 60% of the patients who needed a hip prosthesis, the reason for arthroplasty was nonunion. For 20%, the reason was avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and for another 20% of the patients symptomatic coxarthrosis was the cause. Conclusions: The rate of salvage arthroplasties in this study was similar to the rates in the literature of Hansson Pins (mostly from studies performed in Scandinavia), cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws. The findings suggested that Hansson pins could be used with good results outside of Scandinavia and that they were a reasonable alternative to cancellous screws and the dynamic hip screw. The pins also could be used with satisfactory outcomes in elderly patients, but the rate of salvage arthroplasties would be higher. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1