阅读自己与他人:罗斯的《为什么写作?》以及萨特的《为什么写作?》

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philip Roth Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1353/prs.2023.0003
James Duban
{"title":"阅读自己与他人:罗斯的《为什么写作?》以及萨特的《为什么写作?》","authors":"James Duban","doi":"10.1353/prs.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's \"Pourquoi écrire?\" (\"Why Write?\") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of \"bisociative\" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to \"insensate readers\" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Himself and Others: Roth's Why Write? and Sartre's \\\"Why Write?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"James Duban\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/prs.2023.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's \\\"Pourquoi écrire?\\\" (\\\"Why Write?\\\") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of \\\"bisociative\\\" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to \\\"insensate readers\\\" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2023.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:读者可以从萨特的《Pourquoi samcrire》的相同标题和相关关注点中推断出什么?(《为什么写作?》)和罗斯的《为什么写作?》他的非虚构类文集(1960-2013)?该卷的一些关注似乎将萨特的《存在与虚无》(1943)中更普遍的虚无和可能性的综合与阿瑟·凯斯特勒在《洞察与展望》(1949)中倡导的“分离”认知联系起来。对于罗斯来说,在阅读自己和他人的作品时,他对“麻木的读者”进行了尖锐的反驳,这些读者忽视了个人身份和想象漫游之间的区别,放弃了个人责任,同时贬低了艺术才能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading Himself and Others: Roth's Why Write? and Sartre's "Why Write?"
Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's "Pourquoi écrire?" ("Why Write?") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of "bisociative" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to "insensate readers" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors' Note: Traveling with Roth Philip Roth and "My American Gang" In Medias Res Roth and Reputation versus Sex and Empowerment in The Dying Animal Hauntologies of Fiction: Reading Roth at the End of History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1