CEE国家寻求可持续的养老金制度和国家对资助养老金的支持

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Business: Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.3846/btp.2022.16250
Virginija Poškutė, Tadas Gudaitis, T. Medaiskis, Jaroslav Mečkovski
{"title":"CEE国家寻求可持续的养老金制度和国家对资助养老金的支持","authors":"Virginija Poškutė, Tadas Gudaitis, T. Medaiskis, Jaroslav Mečkovski","doi":"10.3846/btp.2022.16250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pension systems around Europe are being reformed for several decades already. Main objectives of the reforms are to enable people to have adequate income at retirement and to ensure the system’s financial sustainability. Many European countries implemented policies aiming at diversification of financing sources of income at older age: risk-sharing between pay-as-you-go and funded pensions is expected to help in achieving social policy objectives towards pension systems. Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) face even more challenges in ensuring adequate income at retirement. First, CEE countries were required to transform radically their economies in 1990s towards market economy, including old age pension systems. Second, in order to ensure diversified future old age pension income and attract more financial means to the system, introduction of funded pensions from scratch and ensuring as wide as possible coverage with funded pension schemes was of primary importance also. The paper discusses latest developments of retirement pension systems in Europe and state involvement in private pension schemes. In doing so, the focus is on the introduction of funded private pension schemes in selected CEE countries. In spite of initially chosen different paths for the reforms, inconsistent state policies towards funded pensions in the CEE countries resulted in similar outcomes of the reforms. The paper starts with discussion on main objectives of pension systems – enabling people to have adequate income at retirement and ensuring financial sustainability of the systems. Further, possibilities to achieve the objectives of pension reforms are analysed – diversification of income at retirement. Third part of the paper discusses prevailing debates on future of welfare state as such and individualisation trends within different European welfare state models. These debates and perceptions of population about responsibilities of a state for individual welfare affect direction of reforms and future shape of old age pension systems. Fourth part of the paper deals with state policies and tools that are used for encouragement of participation in supplementary pensions. Final part of the paper presents more detailed outline of the pension reforms in selected CEE countries and summarises particular challenges of their pension systems. The paper ends with a discussion on policy implications in relation to latest developments of pension systems in CEE countries.","PeriodicalId":40066,"journal":{"name":"Business: Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE PENSION SYSTEM AND STATE SUPPORT FOR FUNDED PENSIONS IN CEE COUNTRIES\",\"authors\":\"Virginija Poškutė, Tadas Gudaitis, T. Medaiskis, Jaroslav Mečkovski\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/btp.2022.16250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pension systems around Europe are being reformed for several decades already. Main objectives of the reforms are to enable people to have adequate income at retirement and to ensure the system’s financial sustainability. Many European countries implemented policies aiming at diversification of financing sources of income at older age: risk-sharing between pay-as-you-go and funded pensions is expected to help in achieving social policy objectives towards pension systems. Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) face even more challenges in ensuring adequate income at retirement. First, CEE countries were required to transform radically their economies in 1990s towards market economy, including old age pension systems. Second, in order to ensure diversified future old age pension income and attract more financial means to the system, introduction of funded pensions from scratch and ensuring as wide as possible coverage with funded pension schemes was of primary importance also. The paper discusses latest developments of retirement pension systems in Europe and state involvement in private pension schemes. In doing so, the focus is on the introduction of funded private pension schemes in selected CEE countries. In spite of initially chosen different paths for the reforms, inconsistent state policies towards funded pensions in the CEE countries resulted in similar outcomes of the reforms. The paper starts with discussion on main objectives of pension systems – enabling people to have adequate income at retirement and ensuring financial sustainability of the systems. Further, possibilities to achieve the objectives of pension reforms are analysed – diversification of income at retirement. Third part of the paper discusses prevailing debates on future of welfare state as such and individualisation trends within different European welfare state models. These debates and perceptions of population about responsibilities of a state for individual welfare affect direction of reforms and future shape of old age pension systems. Fourth part of the paper deals with state policies and tools that are used for encouragement of participation in supplementary pensions. Final part of the paper presents more detailed outline of the pension reforms in selected CEE countries and summarises particular challenges of their pension systems. The paper ends with a discussion on policy implications in relation to latest developments of pension systems in CEE countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2022.16250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2022.16250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

欧洲各地的养老金制度已经进行了几十年的改革。改革的主要目标是使人们在退休时有足够的收入,并确保该系统的财务可持续性。许多欧洲国家实施了旨在使老年人收入融资来源多样化的政策:现收现付和资助养老金之间的风险分担有望有助于实现养老金制度的社会政策目标。中欧和东欧国家在确保退休时有足够收入方面面临更多挑战。首先,中东欧国家被要求在20世纪90年代从根本上转变其经济,转向市场经济,包括老年养老金制度。其次,为了确保未来养老金收入的多样化,并吸引更多的财政手段进入该系统,从零开始引入资助养老金,并确保资助养老金计划尽可能广泛地覆盖范围,也是至关重要的。本文讨论了欧洲退休养老金制度的最新发展以及国家参与私人养老金计划的情况。在这样做的过程中,重点是在选定的中东欧国家引入资助的私人养老金计划。尽管最初选择了不同的改革道路,但中东欧国家对资助养老金的国家政策不一致,导致了类似的改革结果。本文首先讨论了养老金制度的主要目标——使人们在退休时有足够的收入,并确保制度的财务可持续性。此外,还分析了实现养老金改革目标的可能性——退休时收入的多样化。论文的第三部分讨论了关于福利国家未来的主流争论以及欧洲不同福利国家模式下的个性化趋势。这些关于国家对个人福利责任的辩论和民众的看法影响了改革的方向和老年养老金制度的未来形态。论文的第四部分论述了用于鼓励参与补充养老金的国家政策和工具。论文的最后部分更详细地概述了选定的中东欧国家的养老金改革,并总结了其养老金制度面临的特殊挑战。本文最后讨论了与中东欧国家养老金制度最新发展相关的政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE PENSION SYSTEM AND STATE SUPPORT FOR FUNDED PENSIONS IN CEE COUNTRIES
Pension systems around Europe are being reformed for several decades already. Main objectives of the reforms are to enable people to have adequate income at retirement and to ensure the system’s financial sustainability. Many European countries implemented policies aiming at diversification of financing sources of income at older age: risk-sharing between pay-as-you-go and funded pensions is expected to help in achieving social policy objectives towards pension systems. Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) face even more challenges in ensuring adequate income at retirement. First, CEE countries were required to transform radically their economies in 1990s towards market economy, including old age pension systems. Second, in order to ensure diversified future old age pension income and attract more financial means to the system, introduction of funded pensions from scratch and ensuring as wide as possible coverage with funded pension schemes was of primary importance also. The paper discusses latest developments of retirement pension systems in Europe and state involvement in private pension schemes. In doing so, the focus is on the introduction of funded private pension schemes in selected CEE countries. In spite of initially chosen different paths for the reforms, inconsistent state policies towards funded pensions in the CEE countries resulted in similar outcomes of the reforms. The paper starts with discussion on main objectives of pension systems – enabling people to have adequate income at retirement and ensuring financial sustainability of the systems. Further, possibilities to achieve the objectives of pension reforms are analysed – diversification of income at retirement. Third part of the paper discusses prevailing debates on future of welfare state as such and individualisation trends within different European welfare state models. These debates and perceptions of population about responsibilities of a state for individual welfare affect direction of reforms and future shape of old age pension systems. Fourth part of the paper deals with state policies and tools that are used for encouragement of participation in supplementary pensions. Final part of the paper presents more detailed outline of the pension reforms in selected CEE countries and summarises particular challenges of their pension systems. The paper ends with a discussion on policy implications in relation to latest developments of pension systems in CEE countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business: Theory and Practice
Business: Theory and Practice Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Business: Theory and Practice" is published from 2000. 1 vol (4 issues) per year are published. Articles in Lithuanian, English, German, Russian. The Journal has been included into database "ICONDA" and "Business Source Complete".
期刊最新文献
BARRIERS IN ADOPTION OF FINTECH BY STREET VENDORS AND HAWKERS IN INDIA USING INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING ACTUALIZING THE VENTURING MODEL IN UKRAINE THE APPLICATION OF SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY IN PREDICTING THE ANTECEDENTS OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONAL BRAND COMMUNICATION ON CONSUMERS RESEARCH ON CONSUMERS’ INTENDED USAGE OF COLD CHAIN LOGISTICS SERVICE THROUGH FRESH-FOOD APPS BASED ON THE STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODEL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1