糖尿病定制鞋垫的材料选择:鞋垫材料及其性能的系统综述

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000403
Fredrik A Nilsen, Marius Molund, Eva Marie Lium, K. Hvaal
{"title":"糖尿病定制鞋垫的材料选择:鞋垫材料及其性能的系统综述","authors":"Fredrik A Nilsen, Marius Molund, Eva Marie Lium, K. Hvaal","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Diabetic foot ulceration is one of the most significant causes of infection and amputation in neuropathic patients. Most often, the plantar surface of the foot is affected. Offloading the foot by custom-molded insoles is considered a crucial step in prevention of diabetic foot ulcers, although the most beneficial choice of materials is not well documented. This review focuses on identifying the most suitable materials and material compositions for offloading the diabetic foot. Materials and Methods A systematic review was performed with the aid of a clinical librarian on September 9, 2020. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included based on the following eligibility criteria: interventions in terms of material selection/properties with outcomes reported as either pressure reduction and/or ulcer prevention. Bench studies were also included. At each level of selection, records were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Clinical studies were appraised using the ROBINS-1 tool. Results Through database search, 1131 records were identified and an additional eight records were identified through references and other sources. After removal of duplicates, 927 records were screened, which resulted in 74 full-text records assessed for eligibility. Thirty-seven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Twelve studies examined material properties by bench testing. Five studies were based on finite element analysis. Nineteen clinical studies on material parameters were identified. Six studies supported the use of moderately deformable materials for insole production. Six studies showed better performance of combination material insoles in offloading and under sustained loading. Five studies concluded that increasing the thickness of insoles increased the offloading capabilities. Conclusions The diversity of studies and study designs to date precludes the ability to recommend one type of material over the other. Still some general considerations can be made. For solo-material insoles, moderately deformable materials are preferable, balancing the need for offloading with the need for durability. Increasing the thickness may increase the longevity of the insoles. Combining materials of different properties seems to enhance both the offloading capability and durability of insoles. Clinical Relevance When using a single-material design, moderately deformable materials are preferable. Combining materials of different properties enhances both the offloading capability and durability of insoles.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"e131 - e143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material Selection for Diabetic Custom Insoles: A Systematic Review of Insole Materials and Their Properties\",\"authors\":\"Fredrik A Nilsen, Marius Molund, Eva Marie Lium, K. Hvaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Diabetic foot ulceration is one of the most significant causes of infection and amputation in neuropathic patients. Most often, the plantar surface of the foot is affected. Offloading the foot by custom-molded insoles is considered a crucial step in prevention of diabetic foot ulcers, although the most beneficial choice of materials is not well documented. This review focuses on identifying the most suitable materials and material compositions for offloading the diabetic foot. Materials and Methods A systematic review was performed with the aid of a clinical librarian on September 9, 2020. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included based on the following eligibility criteria: interventions in terms of material selection/properties with outcomes reported as either pressure reduction and/or ulcer prevention. Bench studies were also included. At each level of selection, records were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Clinical studies were appraised using the ROBINS-1 tool. Results Through database search, 1131 records were identified and an additional eight records were identified through references and other sources. After removal of duplicates, 927 records were screened, which resulted in 74 full-text records assessed for eligibility. Thirty-seven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Twelve studies examined material properties by bench testing. Five studies were based on finite element analysis. Nineteen clinical studies on material parameters were identified. Six studies supported the use of moderately deformable materials for insole production. Six studies showed better performance of combination material insoles in offloading and under sustained loading. Five studies concluded that increasing the thickness of insoles increased the offloading capabilities. Conclusions The diversity of studies and study designs to date precludes the ability to recommend one type of material over the other. Still some general considerations can be made. For solo-material insoles, moderately deformable materials are preferable, balancing the need for offloading with the need for durability. Increasing the thickness may increase the longevity of the insoles. Combining materials of different properties seems to enhance both the offloading capability and durability of insoles. Clinical Relevance When using a single-material design, moderately deformable materials are preferable. Combining materials of different properties enhances both the offloading capability and durability of insoles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"e131 - e143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介糖尿病足溃疡是神经病变患者感染和截肢的最重要原因之一。最常见的情况是,足部的足底表面受到影响。用定制的模压鞋垫减轻足部负担被认为是预防糖尿病足溃疡的关键一步,尽管最有益的材料选择并没有很好的记录。这篇综述的重点是确定最合适的材料和材料成分来减轻糖尿病足。材料和方法2020年9月9日,在临床图书管理员的帮助下进行了系统回顾。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行审查。研究基于以下资格标准:材料选择/特性方面的干预措施,结果报告为降压和/或预防溃疡。还包括了台架研究。在每一级筛选中,记录都由两名独立审查员进行审查。使用ROBINS-1工具对临床研究进行评估。结果通过数据库检索,确定了1131条记录,并通过参考文献和其他来源确定了另外8条记录。删除重复项后,对927份记录进行了筛选,结果有74份全文记录被评估为合格。定性综合包括37项研究。12项研究通过台架试验检验了材料性能。五项研究基于有限元分析。确定了19项关于材料参数的临床研究。六项研究支持在鞋垫生产中使用适度变形的材料。六项研究表明,组合材料鞋垫在卸载和持续负载下具有更好的性能。五项研究得出结论,增加鞋垫的厚度可以提高卸载能力。结论迄今为止,研究和研究设计的多样性排除了推荐一种材料而非另一种材料的能力。仍然可以进行一些一般性考虑。对于单人材料鞋垫,适度变形的材料是优选的,以平衡卸载需求和耐用性需求。增加厚度可以增加鞋垫的寿命。将不同性能的材料相结合,似乎可以增强鞋垫的卸载能力和耐用性。临床相关性当使用单一材料设计时,最好使用可适度变形的材料。将不同性能的材料结合在一起,可以增强鞋垫的卸载能力和耐用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Material Selection for Diabetic Custom Insoles: A Systematic Review of Insole Materials and Their Properties
ABSTRACT Introduction Diabetic foot ulceration is one of the most significant causes of infection and amputation in neuropathic patients. Most often, the plantar surface of the foot is affected. Offloading the foot by custom-molded insoles is considered a crucial step in prevention of diabetic foot ulcers, although the most beneficial choice of materials is not well documented. This review focuses on identifying the most suitable materials and material compositions for offloading the diabetic foot. Materials and Methods A systematic review was performed with the aid of a clinical librarian on September 9, 2020. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included based on the following eligibility criteria: interventions in terms of material selection/properties with outcomes reported as either pressure reduction and/or ulcer prevention. Bench studies were also included. At each level of selection, records were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Clinical studies were appraised using the ROBINS-1 tool. Results Through database search, 1131 records were identified and an additional eight records were identified through references and other sources. After removal of duplicates, 927 records were screened, which resulted in 74 full-text records assessed for eligibility. Thirty-seven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Twelve studies examined material properties by bench testing. Five studies were based on finite element analysis. Nineteen clinical studies on material parameters were identified. Six studies supported the use of moderately deformable materials for insole production. Six studies showed better performance of combination material insoles in offloading and under sustained loading. Five studies concluded that increasing the thickness of insoles increased the offloading capabilities. Conclusions The diversity of studies and study designs to date precludes the ability to recommend one type of material over the other. Still some general considerations can be made. For solo-material insoles, moderately deformable materials are preferable, balancing the need for offloading with the need for durability. Increasing the thickness may increase the longevity of the insoles. Combining materials of different properties seems to enhance both the offloading capability and durability of insoles. Clinical Relevance When using a single-material design, moderately deformable materials are preferable. Combining materials of different properties enhances both the offloading capability and durability of insoles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Physical Therapy and Orthosis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Blood Pressure Regulation in Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation: Effects of Wearing a Prosthesis Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot Immediate Effect of Soft Lumbosacral Orthosis on Trunk Stability and Upper-Limb Functionality in Children with Cerebral Palsy Importance of Health Policy and Systems Research for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems: A Call to Action to Accelerate Progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1