债券共同基金和交易所交易基金在压力市场中的流动——不稳定假说的实证研究

Stephen Laipply, Ananth Madhavan
{"title":"债券共同基金和交易所交易基金在压力市场中的流动——不稳定假说的实证研究","authors":"Stephen Laipply, Ananth Madhavan","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proposed mechanism for what we term the destabilization hypothesis is that an exogenous shock triggers large redemptions by fund investors, requiring fund managers to sell securities to raise cash, leading to further drops in security prices and increased systemic risk. Although a large body literature finds little evidence of fund-driven fire-sales in bond markets, the destabilization hypothesis has seen renewed interest among academics and policymakers in the context of bond funds. We examine the impact of shocks on US bond fund flows by sub-asset class and by type of investment vehicle. The time-series analysis we conducted shows that a risk-off shock to markets does not necessarily result in large bond fund outflows. Accordingly, we conclude that there is little evidence that bond funds are a source of systemic risk, particularly bond exchange-traded funds. We also find no evidence of a non-linear response of flows to large shocks.","PeriodicalId":53711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fixed Income","volume":" ","pages":"6 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond Mutual Fund and Exchange-Traded Fund Flows in Stressed Markets: Empirical Evidence on the Destabilization Hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Laipply, Ananth Madhavan\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The proposed mechanism for what we term the destabilization hypothesis is that an exogenous shock triggers large redemptions by fund investors, requiring fund managers to sell securities to raise cash, leading to further drops in security prices and increased systemic risk. Although a large body literature finds little evidence of fund-driven fire-sales in bond markets, the destabilization hypothesis has seen renewed interest among academics and policymakers in the context of bond funds. We examine the impact of shocks on US bond fund flows by sub-asset class and by type of investment vehicle. The time-series analysis we conducted shows that a risk-off shock to markets does not necessarily result in large bond fund outflows. Accordingly, we conclude that there is little evidence that bond funds are a source of systemic risk, particularly bond exchange-traded funds. We also find no evidence of a non-linear response of flows to large shocks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fixed Income\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fixed Income\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fixed Income","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们所说的不稳定假说的拟议机制是,外生冲击会引发基金投资者的大规模赎回,要求基金经理出售证券以筹集现金,导致证券价格进一步下跌,系统性风险增加。尽管大量文献几乎没有发现债券市场中基金驱动的抛售的证据,但学术界和政策制定者对债券基金的不稳定假说重新产生了兴趣。我们按子资产类别和投资工具类型研究了冲击对美国债券基金流动的影响。我们进行的时间序列分析表明,对市场的避险冲击并不一定会导致大量债券资金外流。因此,我们得出的结论是,几乎没有证据表明债券基金是系统性风险的来源,尤其是债券交易所交易基金。我们也没有发现流动对大的冲击有非线性反应的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond Mutual Fund and Exchange-Traded Fund Flows in Stressed Markets: Empirical Evidence on the Destabilization Hypothesis
The proposed mechanism for what we term the destabilization hypothesis is that an exogenous shock triggers large redemptions by fund investors, requiring fund managers to sell securities to raise cash, leading to further drops in security prices and increased systemic risk. Although a large body literature finds little evidence of fund-driven fire-sales in bond markets, the destabilization hypothesis has seen renewed interest among academics and policymakers in the context of bond funds. We examine the impact of shocks on US bond fund flows by sub-asset class and by type of investment vehicle. The time-series analysis we conducted shows that a risk-off shock to markets does not necessarily result in large bond fund outflows. Accordingly, we conclude that there is little evidence that bond funds are a source of systemic risk, particularly bond exchange-traded funds. We also find no evidence of a non-linear response of flows to large shocks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fixed Income
Journal of Fixed Income Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fixed Income (JFI) provides sophisticated analytical research and case studies on bond instruments of all types – investment grade, high-yield, municipals, ABSs and MBSs, and structured products like CDOs and credit derivatives. Industry experts offer detailed models and analysis on fixed income structuring, performance tracking, and risk management. JFI keeps you on the front line of fixed income practices by: •Staying current on the cutting edge of fixed income markets •Managing your bond portfolios more efficiently •Evaluating interest rate strategies and manage interest rate risk •Gaining insights into the risk profile of structured products.
期刊最新文献
How Making Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities Portable May Impact Housing and Mortgage-Backed Securities Investors Gradient Boosting Model for Corporate Default Integrating Multiple Signals in Systematic Corporate Bond Selection Strategies Bond Duration and Convexity under Stochastic Interest Rates and Credit Spreads Is Bloomberg’s Credit Default Swaps Model Superior in Predicting Defaults?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1