多样性问题化:国际律师(不)希望国际法庭发生的变化

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW London Review of International Law Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1093/lril/lrac020
Juliana Santos de Carvalho, J. Uriburu
{"title":"多样性问题化:国际律师(不)希望国际法庭发生的变化","authors":"Juliana Santos de Carvalho, J. Uriburu","doi":"10.1093/lril/lrac020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Scholars working on international courts and tribunals (ICTs) have recently seized the agenda of the diversity of the international judiciary and international institutions more broadly. Focusing, above all, on the lack of women in the different international benches around the world, they have criticised and proposed reforms to the composition of ICTs. This paper argues that the burgeoning literature on the diversity in ICTs expresses a particular politics of inclusion for the composition of the international judiciary. We begin by explaining the importance of looking into knowledge production in international legal scholarship as a site of (re)production of the field’s boundaries and situating the literature under study within the broader universe of the scholarship on ICTs. We then lay out this paper’s main contribution: a reconstruction and critical analysis of the normative commitments of the politics of inclusion underlying the literature on diversity in ICTs.","PeriodicalId":43782,"journal":{"name":"London Review of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematising diversity: The change that international lawyers (do not) want for international courts\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Santos de Carvalho, J. Uriburu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lril/lrac020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Scholars working on international courts and tribunals (ICTs) have recently seized the agenda of the diversity of the international judiciary and international institutions more broadly. Focusing, above all, on the lack of women in the different international benches around the world, they have criticised and proposed reforms to the composition of ICTs. This paper argues that the burgeoning literature on the diversity in ICTs expresses a particular politics of inclusion for the composition of the international judiciary. We begin by explaining the importance of looking into knowledge production in international legal scholarship as a site of (re)production of the field’s boundaries and situating the literature under study within the broader universe of the scholarship on ICTs. We then lay out this paper’s main contribution: a reconstruction and critical analysis of the normative commitments of the politics of inclusion underlying the literature on diversity in ICTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"London Review of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrac020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrac020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从事国际法院和法庭(ict)研究的学者最近抓住了国际司法机构和国际机构更广泛多样性的议程。最重要的是,她们关注的是全球不同国际机构中缺乏女性,她们批评并提议对信息通信技术的构成进行改革。本文认为,关于信息通信技术多样性的新兴文献表达了国际司法机构组成的特殊包容政治。首先,我们将解释将国际法律学术中的知识生产作为该领域边界(再)生产的场所的重要性,并将所研究的文献置于更广阔的信息通信技术学术领域中。然后,我们列出了本文的主要贡献:对信息通信技术多样性文献基础上的包容政治的规范性承诺进行了重建和批判性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Problematising diversity: The change that international lawyers (do not) want for international courts
Scholars working on international courts and tribunals (ICTs) have recently seized the agenda of the diversity of the international judiciary and international institutions more broadly. Focusing, above all, on the lack of women in the different international benches around the world, they have criticised and proposed reforms to the composition of ICTs. This paper argues that the burgeoning literature on the diversity in ICTs expresses a particular politics of inclusion for the composition of the international judiciary. We begin by explaining the importance of looking into knowledge production in international legal scholarship as a site of (re)production of the field’s boundaries and situating the literature under study within the broader universe of the scholarship on ICTs. We then lay out this paper’s main contribution: a reconstruction and critical analysis of the normative commitments of the politics of inclusion underlying the literature on diversity in ICTs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Tracking the civilising mission’s continuities in externalised migration controls: a critical analysis of EU cooperation with third countries ‘Nowhere home’ Is critique part of the practice of international law? Ethical challenges of using trial transcripts for research purposes: A case study of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia International law as shibboleth: the continued appeal of heroic narratives in support of military intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1